TANF FINANACIAL DATA

TANF FINANCIAL DATA

Table A4 - FY 2002 FEDERAL FUNDS SPENT IN FY 2005
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ON ASSISTANCE IN FY 2005 THROUGH THE FOURTH QUARTER

**Data reported by States in Column A on Form ACF-196 Line Items**

STATE	Line 5 TOTAL EXPENDITURES ON ASSISTANCE	Line 5a BASIC ASSISTANCE	Line 5b CHILD CARE	Line 5c TRANSPORTATION	Line 5d ASSISTANCE UNDER PRIOR LAW	% OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES SPENT ON ASSISTANCE
ALABAMA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ALASKA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ARIZONA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ARKANSAS	6,962,550	6,962,550	0	0	0	90%
CALIFORNIA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
COLORADO	0	0	0	0	0	0%
CONNECTICUT	0	0	0	0	0	0%
DELAWARE	0	<49,686>	49,686	0	0	0%
DIST.OF COLUMBIA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
FLORIDA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
GEORGIA	9,068,733	9,068,733	0	0	0	100%
HAWAII	1,984,351	1,984,351	0	0	0	100%
IDAHO	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ILLINOIS	0	0	0	0	0	0%
INDIANA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
IOWA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
KANSAS	0	0	0	0	0	0%
KENTUCKY	0	0	0	0	0	0%
LOUISIANA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MAINE	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MARYLAND	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MASSACHUSETTS	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MICHIGAN	201,963	201,963	0	0	0	0%
MINNESOTA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MISSISSIPPI	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MISSOURI	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MONTANA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEBRASKA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEVADA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEW HAMPSHIRE	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEW JERSEY	76,312,354	75,362,563	0	949,791	0	93%
NEW MEXICO	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEW YORK	11,983,446	11,838,363	0	0	145,083	176%
NORTH CAROLINA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NORTH DAKOTA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
OHIO	23,175,810	23,175,810	0	0	0	100%
OKLAHOMA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
OREGON	0	0	0	0	0	0%
PENNSYLVANIA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
RHODE ISLAND	0	0	0	0	0	0%
SOUTH CAROLINA	23,940,884	21,109,916	0	2,830,968	0	27%
SOUTH DAKOTA	6,326,575	6,326,575	0	0	0	100%
TENNESSEE	0	0	0	0	0	0%
TEXAS	0	0	0	0	0	0%
UTAH	0	0	0	0	0	0%
VERMONT	0	0	0	0	0	0%
VIRGINIA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
WASHINGTON	0	0	0	0	0	0%
WEST VIRGINIA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
WISCONSIN	21,859,923	21,859,923	0	0	0	100%
WYOMING	0	0	0	0	0	0%
TOTAL	181,816,589	177,841,061	49,686	3,780,759	145,083	-
Percentages 1/	100%	98%	0%	2%	0%	-
Percentages 2/	73%	72%	0%	2%	0%	-

1/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures on assistance.

2/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures (Line 7). An abnormal negative
percentage is the result of the total expenditures on assistance being a negative value. An abnormal positive percentage
is the result of total expenditures being less than that of expenditures on assistance.