TANF 4th Quarter, FY 1998
Table D
State Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Analysis Through 4th Qtr. FY 1998
(data as of 2/5/99)
| STATE |
TOTAL STATE MOE EXPENDITURES
IN THE TANF PROGRAM |
TOTAL STATE MOE EXPENDITURES
IN SEPARATE STATE PROGRAMS (SSP) |
COMBINED STATE EXPENDITURES
(both TANF and SSP) |
STATE MOE REQUIREMENT
AT 80 PERCENT |
COMBINED STATE EXPENDITURES
AS % OF MOE LEVEL |
| Alabama |
39,214,118 |
- |
39,214,118 |
41,828,393 |
75% |
| Alaska |
52,205,229 |
- |
52,205,229 |
52,205,229 |
80% |
| Arizona |
91,342,799 |
10,032,936 |
101,375,735 |
100,550,132 |
81% |
| Arkansas |
23,231,611 |
- |
23,231,611 |
22,228,215 |
84% |
| California |
2,786,606,326 |
121,185,078 |
2,907,791,404 |
2,907,791,308 |
80% |
| Colorado |
105,503,229 |
- |
105,503,229 |
88,395,622 |
95% |
| Connecticut |
184,752,199 |
- |
184,752,199 |
195,649,127 |
76% |
| Delaware |
25,691,053 |
- |
25,691,053 |
23,222,474 |
89% |
| District of Columbia |
75,145,547 |
- |
75,145,547 |
75,145,547 |
80% |
| Florida |
368,448,952 |
29,927,198 |
398,376,150 |
392,921,042 |
81% |
| Georgia |
115,226,354 |
71,913,685 |
187,140,039 |
184,926,429 |
81% |
| Hawaii |
39,052,057 |
46,194,948 |
85,247,005 |
75,893,167 |
90% |
| Idaho |
14,590,646 |
- |
14,590,646 |
14,590,646 |
80% |
| Illinois |
438,560,057 |
38,498,191 |
477,058,248 |
458,760,739 |
83% |
| Indiana |
109,362,348 |
11,730,962 |
121,093,310 |
121,093,891 |
80% |
| Iowa |
57,892,046 |
8,202,110 |
66,094,156 |
66,094,156 |
80% |
| Kansas |
62,925,691 |
- |
62,925,691 |
65,866,230 |
76% |
| Kentucky |
67,613,590 |
- |
67,613,590 |
71,913,000 |
75% |
| Louisiana |
59,109,470 |
- |
59,109,470 |
59,109,470 |
80% |
| Maine |
24,739,217 |
16,084,649 |
40,823,866 |
40,025,539 |
82% |
| Maryland |
172,477,120 |
4,488,324 |
176,965,444 |
188,763,140 |
75% |
| Massachusetts |
358,947,523 |
- |
358,947,523 |
382,877,358 |
75% |
| Michigan |
502,198,724 |
- |
502,198,724 |
499,752,934 |
80% |
| Minnesota |
191,728,278 |
- |
191,728,278 |
191,728,278 |
80% |
| Mississippi |
23,172,595 |
- |
23,172,595 |
23,172,595 |
80% |
| Missouri |
128,128,826 |
- |
128,128,826 |
128,128,826 |
80% |
| Montana |
16,763,669 |
- |
16,763,669 |
16,763,670 |
80% |
| Nebraska 1/ |
28,096,240 |
- |
28,096,240 |
30,538,068 |
74% |
| Nevada |
27,188,122 |
- |
27,188,122 |
27,188,122 |
80% |
| New Hampshire |
32,115,649 |
- |
32,115,649 |
34,256,003 |
75% |
| New Jersey |
300,160,007 |
- |
300,160,007 |
320,170,674 |
75% |
| New Mexico |
39,947,126 |
- |
39,947,126 |
39,835,873 |
80% |
| New York |
1,718,578,445 |
- |
1,718,578,445 |
1,833,150,341 |
75% |
| North Carolina |
170,146,891 |
- |
170,146,891 |
164,454,147 |
83% |
| North Dakota |
9,673,984 |
- |
9,673,984 |
9,673,905 |
80% |
| Ohio |
419,102,642 |
- |
419,102,642 |
416,886,662 |
80% |
| Oklahoma |
65,333,660 |
- |
65,333,660 |
65,257,935 |
80% |
| Oregon |
91,636,300 |
- |
91,636,300 |
97,745,386 |
75% |
| Pennsylvania |
434,267,306 |
- |
434,267,306 |
434,267,306 |
80% |
| Rhode Island |
69,992,531 |
5,161,011 |
75,153,542 |
64,391,515 |
93% |
| South Carolina |
38,228,678 |
- |
38,228,678 |
38,321,856 |
80% |
| South Dakota |
9,200,000 |
- |
9,200,000 |
9,111,256 |
81% |
| Tennessee |
88,330,540 |
187,810 |
88,518,350 |
88,330,537 |
80% |
| Texas |
251,440,804 |
- |
251,440,804 |
251,440,804 |
80% |
| Utah |
25,290,550 |
- |
25,290,550 |
26,976,586 |
75% |
| Vermont |
27,363,633 |
- |
27,363,633 |
27,253,226 |
80% |
| Virginia |
136,718,048 |
- |
136,718,048 |
136,718,048 |
80% |
| Washington |
305,878,135 |
4,048,140 |
309,926,275 |
290,198,212 |
85% |
| West Virginia |
43,526,202 |
- |
43,526,202 |
34,446,442 |
101% |
| Wisconsin |
147,476,934 |
21,387,956 |
168,864,890 |
180,122,550 |
75% |
| Wyoming |
9,011,429 |
2,264,099 |
11,275,528 |
11,249,244 |
80% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
10,623,333,130 |
391,307,097 |
11,014,640,227 |
11,129,266,020 |
79% |
GENERAL NOTES:
This table shows total State TANF MOE expenditures through the fourth
quarter of FY 1998, and the comparison of State MOE expenditures to
meet the 80 percent annual MOE level. The MOE level at 80 percent has
been adjusted for States with Tribes operating TANF.
FOOTNOTE:
1/ Nebraska has identified their underreporting of MOE expenditures
as a reporting error, and have indicated that they will be submitting
a revised report.
Last Updated on 3/3/99 By ACF
|