<!--
function MM_swapImgRestore() { //v2.0
if (document.MM_swapImgData != null)
for (var i=0; i<(document.MM_swapImgData.length-1); i+=2)
document.MM_swapImgData[i].src = document.MM_swapImgData[i+1];
}
function MM_preloadImages() { //v2.0
if (document.images) {
var imgFiles = MM_preloadImages.arguments;
if (document.preloadArray==null) document.preloadArray = new Array();
var i = document.preloadArray.length;
with (document) for (var j=0; j<imgFiles.length; j++) if (imgFiles[j].charAt(0)!="#"){
preloadArray[i] = new Image;
preloadArray[i++].src = imgFiles[j];
} }
}
function MM_displayStatusMsg(msgStr) { //v2.0
status=msgStr;
document.MM_returnValue = true;
}
//-->
Document
last modified Friday, Jan 05 2007
Welfare
Reform:
Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) Program
Federal
Awards, Transfers and Expenditures FY-1999
Reflects
data reported by States as of 1st Quarter, FY 1999
|
Part 1 | Part
2 | Part 3 | Financial
Data main page |
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
TOTAL
AWARDED \1 |
TRANSFERRED
TO CCDF |
TRANSFERRED
TO SSBG |
AVAILABLE
FOR TANF |
| Alabama |
50,262,345 |
|
|
50,262,345 |
| Alaska |
14,712,691 |
|
|
14,712,691 |
| Arizona |
58,677,541 |
|
|
58,677,541 |
| Arkansas |
28,199,429 |
|
|
28,199,429 |
| California |
931,489,178 |
|
|
931,489,178 |
| Colorado
|
30,089,270 |
|
|
30,089,270 |
| Connecticut |
56,655,477 |
|
5,996,258 |
50,659,219 |
| Delaware |
8,072,745 |
|
|
8,072,745 |
| District of Columbia |
23,152,454 |
4,630,490 |
2,315,245 |
16,206,719 |
| Florida |
151,586,021 |
30,317,204 |
15,158,602 |
106,110,215 |
| Georgia |
88,353,093 |
11,000,000 |
9,207,051 |
68,146,042 |
| Hawaii |
24,726,197 |
|
|
24,726,197 |
| Idaho |
13,474,179 |
|
1,347,417 |
12,126,762 |
| Illinois |
146,264,240 |
32,545,385 |
|
113,718,855 |
| Indiana |
51,699,777 |
|
|
51,699,777 |
| Iowa |
31,215,564 |
|
|
31,215,564 |
| Kansas |
101,931,061 |
152,765 |
|
101,778,296 |
| Kentucky |
40,000,000 |
|
|
40,000,000 |
| Louisiana |
16,642,585 |
|
|
16,642,585 |
| Maine |
14,419,954 |
1,666,231 |
625,000 |
12,128,723 |
| Maryland |
57,274,508 |
|
|
57,274,508 |
| Massachusetts |
114,842,779 |
12,166,794 |
|
102,675,985 |
| Michigan |
193,838,215 |
|
|
193,838,215 |
| Minnesota |
66,996,221 |
|
|
66,996,221 |
| Mississippi |
23,364,658 |
|
2,169,189 |
21,195,469 |
| Missouri |
54,262,935 |
|
21,705,174 |
32,557,761 |
| Montana |
11,949,852 |
|
|
11,949,852 |
| Nebraska |
14,507,145 |
- |
- |
14,507,145 |
| Nevada |
11,449,357 |
- |
- |
11,449,357 |
| New Hampshire |
9,650,000 |
- |
- |
9,650,000 |
| New
Jersey |
53,453,016 |
16,349,984 |
10,100,871 |
27,002,161 |
| New Mexico |
34,134,895 |
- |
- |
34,134,895 |
| New York |
610,732,650 |
- |
- |
610,732,650 |
| North Carolina |
79,962,210 |
- |
- |
79,962,210 |
| North Dakota |
5,573,300 |
- |
- |
5,573,300 |
| Ohio |
110,554,611 |
- |
- |
110,554,611 |
| Oklahoma |
36,543,052 |
5,355,519 |
- |
31,187,533 |
| Oregon |
167,808,448 |
- |
- |
167,808,448 |
| Pennsylvania |
179,875,000 |
- |
- |
179,875,000 |
| Rhode Island |
22,500,000 |
- |
- |
22,500,000 |
| South
Carolina |
24,991,956 |
- |
- |
24,991,956 |
| South Dakota |
5,719,894 |
- |
- |
5,719,894 |
| Tennessee |
102,311,404 |
- |
- |
102,311,404 |
| Texas |
216,402,639 |
- |
5,026,380 |
211,376,259 |
| Utah |
20,791,188 |
- |
- |
20,791,188 |
| Vermont |
11,838,295 |
1,636,643 |
1,183,830 |
9,017,822 |
| Virginia |
23,054,849 |
- |
- |
23,054,849 |
| Washington |
100,182,077 |
- |
- |
100,182,077 |
| West Virginia |
27,544,077 |
10,000,000 |
8,200,000 |
9,344,077 |
| Wisconsin |
157,386,130 |
- |
- |
157,386,130 |
| Wyoming
|
800,000 |
- |
- |
800,000 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Total |
$4,431,919,162 |
$125,821,015
|
$83,035,017
|
$4,223,063,130
|
GENERAL NOTES:
This table shows information exactly as reported by States in column
A on the quarterly TANF report (Form no. ACF-196). States were required
to submit this TANF financial data by 2/14/99.
Table A shows how States used Federal funds. Tables B and C show how
States used their own funds in the TANF program.
Financial
Data main page
  |
