TANF Financial Data

TANF FINANCIAL DATA

Table A1 - FY 2000 FEDERAL FUNDS SPENT IN FY 2000
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ON ASSISTANCE IN FY 2000 THROUGH THE FOURTH QUARTER

**Data reported by States in Column A on Form ACF-196 Line Items**

STATE	Line 5 TOTAL EXPENDITURES ON ASSISTANCE	Line 5a BASIC ASSISTANCE	Line 5b CHILD CARE	Line 5c TRANSPORTATION	Line 5d ASSISTANCE UNDER PRIOR LAW	% OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES SPENT ON ASSISTANCE
ALABAMA	2,267,226	2,267,226	0	0	0	12%
ALASKA	19,211,557	10,862,599	7,525,582	823,376	0	53%
ARIZONA	19,314,345	18,556,537	0	757,808	0	18%
ARKANSAS	5,160,055	5,160,055	0	0	0	16%
CALIFORNIA	1,613,593,108	839,706,071	182,237,993	166,701,643	424,947,401	58%
COLORADO	0	0	0	0	0	0%
CONNECTICUT	113,485,653	113,485,653	0	0	0	46%
DELAWARE	21,598,827	15,167,921	0	6,430,906	0	77%
DIST.OF COLUMBIA	5,028,181	5,028,181	0	0	0	10%
FLORIDA	27,255,889	0	25,676,726	1,579,163	0	10%
GEORGIA	75,398,670	54,253,195	1,000,000	20,145,475	0	43%
HAWAII	67,011,773	67,011,773	0	0	0	86%
IDAHO	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ILLINOIS	225,106,223	216,748,883	0	8,357,340	0	51%
INDIANA	39,282,274	39,258,070	24,204	0	0	56%
IOWA	13,655,608	13,655,608	0	0	0	18%
KANSAS	54,384,116	1,367,008	0	666,875	52,350,233	71%
KENTUCKY	45,134,452	40,446,203	933,901	3,754,348	0	37%
LOUISIANA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MAINE	45,080,888	32,706,209	3,442,976	8,931,703	0	81%
MARYLAND	5,302,511	5,302,511	0	0	0	8%
MASSACHUSETTS	158,605,007	150,003,478	8,082,495	519,034	0	48%
MICHIGAN	61,278,688	11,835,535	0	0	49,443,153	10%
MINNESOTA	33,267,219	33,267,219	0	0	0	45%
MISSISSIPPI	696,894	0	0	696,894	0	10%
MISSOURI	122,218,876	72,667,816	0	0	49,551,060	70%
MONTANA	2,354,540	444,236	0	0	1,910,304	21%
NEBRASKA	22,536,765	22,536,765	0	0	0	51%
NEVADA	8,042,058	4,778,966	334,047	649,638	2,279,407	31%
NEW HAMPSHIRE	20,156,371	12,393,995	0	0	7,762,376	66%
NEW JERSEY	14,450,951	14,209,961	0	240,990	0	70%
NEW MEXICO	32,624,600	32,568,229	0	56,371	0	59%
NEW YORK	593,028,693	425,076,888	0	0	167,951,805	55%
NORTH CAROLINA	101,576,519	101,566,229	0	10,290	0	66%
NORTH DAKOTA	10,179,457	15,966	0	381,241	9,782,250	63%
OHIO	107,989,444	82,043,393	0	25,946,051	0	24%
OKLAHOMA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
OREGON	68,691,496	49,792,540	8,428,169	6,431,347	4,039,440	47%
PENNSYLVANIA	36,952,717	28,542,981	0	8,409,736	0	20%
RHODE ISLAND	67,665,488	67,368,177	0	297,311	0	75%
SOUTH CAROLINA	19,330,491	17,786,262	0	1,544,229	0	25%
SOUTH DAKOTA	3,809,124	0	0	0	3,809,124	59%
TENNESSEE	51,506,456	43,906,223	6,110,660	1,489,573	0	74%
TEXAS	111,191,145	59,638,846	0	3,420,457	48,131,842	35%
UTAH	20,273,026	19,031,586	1,224,498	16,942	0	43%
VERMONT	25,055,100	20,947,914	907,709	3,199,477	0	79%
VIRGINIA	22,562,284	22,562,284	0	0	0	29%
WASHINGTON	4,138,148	4,138,148	0	0	0	5%
WEST VIRGINIA	2,664,042	0	0	2,664,042	0	5%
WISCONSIN	12,261,802	12,220,774	0	41,028	0	7%
WYOMING	1,333,267	1,133,061	0	200,206	0	41%
TOTAL	4,133,712,024	2,791,461,175	245,928,960	274,363,494	821,958,395	-
Percentages 1/	100%	68%	6%	7%	20%	-
Percentages 2/	45%	30%	3%	3%	9%	-

1/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures on assistance.

2/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures (Line 7). An abnormal negative
percentage is the result of the total expenditures on assistance being a negative value. An abnormal positive percentage
is the result of total expenditures being less than that of expenditures on assistance.