TANF Financial Data

TANF FINANCIAL DATA

Table A1 - FY 2002 FEDERAL FUNDS SPENT IN FY 2002
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ON ASSISTANCE IN FY 2002 THROUGH THE FOURTH QUARTER

**Data reported by States in Column A on Form ACF-196 Line Items**

STATE	Line 5 TOTAL EXPENDITURES ON ASSISTANCE	Line 5a BASIC ASSISTANCE	Line 5b CHILD CARE	Line 5c TRANSPORTATION	Line 5d ASSISTANCE UNDER PRIOR LAW	% OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES SPENT ON ASSISTANCE
ALABAMA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ALASKA	16,573,244	8,307,183	5,977,744	2,288,317	0	48%
ARIZONA	71,200,930	70,621,525	0	579,405	0	47%
ARKANSAS	13,158,662	13,158,662	0	0	0	34%
CALIFORNIA	1,075,212,814	498,831,425	51,363,840	54,104,103	470,913,446	45%
COLORADO	6,909,041	6,340,389	0	568,652	0	12%
CONNECTICUT	82,958,938	77,275,930	0	2,765,213	2,917,795	33%
DELAWARE	24,219,447	16,175,915	0	8,043,532	0	87%
DIST.OF COLUMBIA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
FLORIDA	3,093,445	0	2,438,058	655,387	0	1%
GEORGIA	9,389,971	2,111,785	0	7,278,186	0	5%
HAWAII	10,000,000	10,000,000	0	0	0	48%
IDAHO	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ILLINOIS	85,871,831	81,912,743	0	3,959,088	0	16%
INDIANA	100,520,587	90,569,534	0	9,951,053	0	60%
IOWA	16,764,955	16,764,955	0	0	0	23%
KANSAS	42,550,680	14,110,563	0	1,645,629	26,794,488	62%
KENTUCKY	45,850,693	33,361,270	7,791,760	4,697,663	0	35%
LOUISIANA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MAINE	47,228,477	31,089,338	9,357,709	6,781,430	0	81%
MARYLAND	15,014,455	15,014,455	0	0	0	10%
MASSACHUSETTS	97,688,541	88,767,756	8,657,653	263,132	0	31%
MICHIGAN	69,671,432	23,828,727	18,440,338	0	27,402,367	10%
MINNESOTA	26,436,524	26,425,717	0	10,807	0	22%
MISSISSIPPI	11,808,598	455,687	0	11,352,911	0	28%
MISSOURI	147,998,015	91,090,097	0	0	56,907,918	77%
MONTANA	6,536,928	3,914,841	0	28,240	2,593,847	35%
NEBRASKA	21,583,685	21,583,685	0	0	0	61%
NEVADA	8,474,374	4,856,535	0	643,333	2,974,506	30%
NEW HAMPSHIRE	8,310,753	0	0	0	8,310,753	32%
NEW JERSEY	26,700,630	17,514,750	0	5,556,238	3,629,642	23%
NEW MEXICO	26,111,558	25,681,039	0	430,519	0	58%
NEW YORK	619,377,605	302,674,714	0	0	316,702,891	47%
NORTH CAROLINA	116,073,304	116,073,304	0	0	0	56%
NORTH DAKOTA	4,364,912	1,935,455	294,929	939,483	1,195,045	23%
OHIO	7,240,368	2,072,372	0	5,167,996	0	2%
OKLAHOMA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
OREGON	72,775,996	51,649,543	4,182,827	10,336,981	6,606,645	47%
PENNSYLVANIA	3,050,360	2,058,127	0	992,233	0	2%
RHODE ISLAND	72,551,639	72,335,697	0	215,942	0	73%
SOUTH CAROLINA	23,874,832	21,043,864	0	2,830,968	0	29%
SOUTH DAKOTA	3,436,739	0	0	0	3,436,739	49%
TENNESSEE	70,359,601	60,815,659	7,439,475	2,104,467	0	51%
TEXAS	63,605,518	0	62,614	2,389,204	61,153,700	18%
UTAH	6,987,158	0	4,504,454	2,482,704	0	17%
VERMONT	27,282,020	22,699,791	0	4,582,229	0	73%
VIRGINIA	13,655,909	13,655,909	0	0	0	13%
WASHINGTON	40,339,886	40,339,886	0	0	0	17%
WEST VIRGINIA	2,826,910	2,826,910	0	0	0	4%
WISCONSIN	20,789,000	20,601,041	0	187,959	0	10%
WYOMING	2,997,170	1,497,170	1,500,000	0	0	40%
TOTAL	3,289,428,135	2,022,043,948	122,011,401	153,833,004	991,539,782	-
Percentages 1/	100%	61%	4%	5%	30%	-
Percentages 2/	33%	20%	1%	2%	10%	-

1/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures on assistance.

2/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures (Line 7). An abnormal negative
percentage is the result of the total expenditures on assistance being a negative value. An abnormal positive percentage
is the result of total expenditures being less than that of expenditures on assistance.