Skip ACF banner and navigation
Department of Health and Human Services logo
Questions?  
Privacy  
Site Index  
Contact Us  
   Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News Search  
Administration for Children and Families US Department of Health and Human Services
TANF Financial Data > FY 1999 TANF Financial Data


TANF FINANCIAL DATA


Table A2 - FY 1998 FEDERAL FUNDS SPENT IN FY 1999
EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE IN FY 1999 THROUGH THE FOURTH QUARTER

Data reported by States in Column A on Form ACF-196 Line Items

STATE LINE 6
TOTAL EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE
Line 6a
WORK RELATED ACTIVITIES
Line 6b
CHILD CARE
Line 6c
TRANSPORTATION
Line 6d
IDA
Line 6e
REFUNDABLE EITC
Line 6f
OTHER REFUNDABLE TAX CREDIT
Line 6g
NON-RECUR
SHORT-TERM
BENEFITS
Line 6i
NON-ASSIST SOLELY UNDER PRIOR LAW
Total of Other Categories of Non-Assistance Lines 6h - 6m % OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES SPENT ON NON ASSISTANCE 2/
ALABAMA 6,314,284 643,542 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,670,742 63%
ALASKA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
ARIZONA 4,299,713 1,004,329 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,295,384 40%
ARKANSAS 13,596,621 8,691,474 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,905,147 46%
CALIFORNIA <120,840,430> <68,516,888> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <52,323,542> -31%
COLORADO 17,985,408 2,753,264 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,232,144 45%
CONNECTICUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
DELAWARE 848,185 265,462 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 582,723 111%
DIST.OF COLUMBIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
FLORIDA 161,305,039 84,552,772 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76,752,267 53%
GEORGIA 14,137,885 9,988,521 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,149,364 23%
HAWAII 68,120 <464,236> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 532,356 100%
IDAHO 15,715,576 10,661 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,704,915 90%
ILLINOIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
INDIANA 3,590,164 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,590,164 7%
IOWA 14,737,378 4,132,957 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,604,421 41%
KANSAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
KENTUCKY 17,329,245 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,329,245 104%
LOUISIANA 18,519,037 18,497,263 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21,774 46%
MAINE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MARYLAND 11,729,893 10,678,488 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,051,405 43%
MASSACHUSETTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MICHIGAN 29,715,914 23,690,507 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,025,407 33%
MINNESOTA 28,399,960 13,872,764 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,527,196 26%
MISSISSIPPI 2,675,828 1,964,043 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 711,785 110%
MISSOURI 14,886,639 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,886,639 24%
MONTANA 482,001 79,496 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 402,505 19%
NEBRASKA 8,257,846 3,740,937 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,516,909 34%
NEVADA 4,337,156 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,337,156 54%
NEW HAMPSHIRE 1,850,860 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,850,860 31%
NEW JERSEY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEW MEXICO 7,539,833 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,539,833 23%
NEW YORK 77,347,959 35,286,246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42,061,713 36%
NORTH CAROLINA 11,148,089 191,532 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,956,557 12%
NORTH DAKOTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
OHIO 153,652,445 501,663 29,416,442 0 0 0 0 0 0 123,734,340 59%
OKLAHOMA 33,284,751 11,242,034 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22,042,717 40%
OREGON 43,837,443 26,806,946 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,030,497 26%
PENNSYLVANIA 37,939,543 7,205,377 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,734,166 33%
RHODE ISLAND 57,746 57,746 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1%
SOUTH CAROLINA <1,088,604> <1,088,604> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
SOUTH DAKOTA 0 359,915 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <359,915> 0%
TENNESSEE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
TEXAS 88,642,217 50,393,970 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38,248,247 98%
UTAH 5,684,389 4,335,420 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,348,969 42%
VERMONT 241,303 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 241,303 4%
VIRGINIA 6,918,325 4,235,489 568,903 2,062,630 0 0 0 0 0 51,303 21%
WASHINGTON 71,501,002 26,272,813 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,228,189 50%
WEST VIRGINIA 11,304,994 129,428 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,175,566 53%
WISCONSIN 39,929,185 <5,407,615> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,336,800 51%
WYOMING 9,490 9,490 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10%
Total 857,892,432 281,117,206 29,985,345 2,062,630 0 0 0 0 0 544,727,251 -
Percentages 1/ 100% 33% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 63% -
Percentages 2/ 32% 10% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20% -
1/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total expenditures on non-assistance (Line 6).
2/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures (Line 7).An abnormal negative percentage is the result of the total expenditures on non-assistance being a negative value. An abnormal positive percentage is the result of total expenditures being less than that of expenditures on non-assistance.


Department of Health and Human Services Logo Department of Health and Human Services
Administration for Children and Families