Skip ACF banner and navigation
Department of Health and Human Services logo
Questions?  
Privacy  
Site Index  
Contact Us  
  Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News Search  
Administration for Children and Families US Department of Health and Human Services TANF Financial Data > FY 2000 TANF Financial Data


TANF FINANCIAL DATA


Table A2 - FY 1999 FEDERAL FUNDS SPENT IN FY 2000
EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE IN FY 2000 THROUGH THE FOURTH QUARTER

Data reported by States in Column A on Form ACF-196 Line Items

STATE LINE 6
TOTAL EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE		 Line 6a
WORK RELATED ACTIVITIES		 Line 6b
CHILD CARE		 Line 6c
TRANSPORTATION		 Line 6d
IDA		 Line 6e
REFUNDABLE EITC		 Line 6f
OTHER REFUNDABLE TAX CREDIT		 Line 6g
NON-RECUR
SHORT-TERM
BENEFITS		 Line 6i
NON-ASSIST SOLELY UNDER PRIOR LAW		 Total of Other Categories of Non-Assistance Lines 6h - 6m % OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES SPENT ON NON ASSISTANCE 2/
ALABAMA 4,920,472 436,881 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,483,591 14%
ALASKA 1,339,737 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,339,737 19%
ARIZONA 19,256,282 8,307,907 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,948,375 42%
ARKANSAS 35,755,405 18,854,408 864,334 2,329,308 77,146 0 0 0 0 13,630,209 64%
CALIFORNIA 29,118,523 7,374,882 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21,743,641 3%
COLORADO 31,010,737 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31,010,737 46%
CONNECTICUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
DELAWARE 578,135 192,745 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 385,390 22%
DIST.OF COLUMBIA 12,550,931 4,165,256 5,075,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,310,675 99%
FLORIDA 116,540,919 99,988,072 186,399 0 0 0 0 1,764,411 0 14,602,037 97%
GEORGIA 64,554 17,939,125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <17,874,571> 0%
HAWAII 838,094 <481,719> 0 901,328 0 0 0 0 0 418,485 15%
IDAHO 11,904,373 6,087,886 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,816,487 100%
ILLINOIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
INDIANA 75,374,740 980,669 52,444,040 196,479 0 0 0 0 0 21,753,552 95%
IOWA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
KANSAS <34,674,481> <483,998> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <34,190,483> 0%
KENTUCKY 11,262,210 0 6,410,322 3,760,236 0 0 0 0 0 1,091,652 111%
LOUISIANA <8,851,197> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <8,851,197> -51%
MAINE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MARYLAND 26,121,122 <12,430,384> 28,904,677 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,646,829 36%
MASSACHUSETTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MICHIGAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MINNESOTA 49,683,845 32,434,382 0 2,287,518 0 0 0 0 0 14,961,945 43%
MISSISSIPPI 5,754,783 1,949,954 0 2,390,102 0 0 0 0 0 1,414,727 39%
MISSOURI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MONTANA <125,616> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,293 <126,909> -2%
NEBRASKA 1,588,895 476,134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,112,761 38%
NEVADA 3,949,339 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,949,339 25%
NEW HAMPSHIRE 2,572,174 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,572,174 24%
NEW JERSEY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEW MEXICO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEW YORK 120,177,992 7,660,195 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 112,517,797 33%
NORTH CAROLINA 70,572,528 4,269,366 303,138 899,790 0 0 0 549,176 53,106,339 11,444,719 69%
NORTH DAKOTA 1,764,021 1,195,662 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 568,359 24%
OHIO 75,776,000 <7,662> 73,762,807 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,020,855 100%
OKLAHOMA <14,310,249> <6,339,733> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <7,970,516> -24%
OREGON <6,016,724> 9,683,568 6,491,615 0 0 0 0 0 0 <22,191,907> -32%
PENNSYLVANIA 94,757,526 21,419,565 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73,337,961 72%
RHODE ISLAND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
SOUTH CAROLINA 5,108,618 5,108,618 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100%
SOUTH DAKOTA <1,212,926> 1,751,058 0 75,933 0 0 0 0 0 <3,039,917> -55%
TENNESSEE 24,498,878 20,504,040 246,855 119,814 0 0 0 0 0 3,628,169 54%
TEXAS 99,049,390 21,960,701 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77,088,689 56%
UTAH 4,618,752 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,618,752 26%
VERMONT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
VIRGINIA 3,951,044 <3,476,413> 0 3,704,956 0 0 0 2,278,125 0 1,444,376 25%
WASHINGTON 61,870,160 52,770,295 0 2,326,803 0 0 0 3,100 19,855,228 <13,085,266> 33%
WEST VIRGINIA 7,960,532 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,960,532 100%
WISCONSIN 2,129,340 432,447 0 966,068 0 48,000,000 0 164,736 0 <47,433,911> 12%
WYOMING 573,414 <370,928> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 944,342 73%
Total 947,802,272 322,352,979 174,689,187 19,958,335 77,146 48,000,000 0 4,759,548 72,962,860 305,002,217 -
Percentages 1/ 100% 34% 18% 2% 0% 5% 0% 1% 8% 32% -
Percentages 2/ 28% 10% 5% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 9% -
1/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total expenditures on non-assistance (Line 6).
2/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures (Line 7).An abnormal negative percentage is the result of the total expenditures on non-assistance being a negative value. An abnormal positive percentage is the result of total expenditures being less than that of expenditures on non-assistance.


Department of Health and Human Services Logo Department of Health and Human Services
Administration for Children and Families