TANF Financial Data

TANF FINANCIAL DATA

Table A2 - FY 2001 FEDERAL FUNDS SPENT IN FY 2002
EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE IN FY 2002 THROUGH THE FOURTH QUARTER

**Data reported by States in Column A on Form ACF-196 Line Items**

STATE	LINE 6 TOTAL EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE	Line 6a WORK RELATED ACTIVITIES	Line 6b CHILD CARE	Line 6c TRANSPORTATION	Line 6d IDA	Line 6e REFUNDABLE EITC	Line 6f OTHER REFUNDABLE TAX CREDIT	Line 6g NON-RECUR SHORT-TERM BENEFITS	Line 6i NON-ASSIST SOLELY UNDER PRIOR LAW	Total of Other Categories of Non-Assistance Lines 6h - 6m	% OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES SPENT ON NON ASSISTANCE 2/
ALABAMA	8,335,703	1,273,576	93,315	34,382	0	0	0	0	<16,876,298>	23,810,728	52%
ALASKA	1,554,721	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1,554,721	11%
ARIZONA	59,148,835	5,986,390	27,609,600	1,974,161	0	0	0	0	8,169,413	15,409,271	101%
ARKANSAS	2,297,016	1,057,210	96,594	54,822	32,059	0	0	0	0	1,056,331	26%
CALIFORNIA	57,618,900	6,854,939	<5,877,309>	5,470,632	0	0	0	0	0	51,170,638	16%
COLORADO	36,290,069	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	36,290,069	48%
CONNECTICUT	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
DELAWARE	<1,218>	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	<1,218>	-1%
DIST.OF COLUMBIA	16,370,371	8,918,330	6,023,349	0	0	0	0	0	0	1,428,692	44%
FLORIDA	141,948,317	0	95,414,929	0	0	0	0	0	0	46,533,388	71%
GEORGIA	96,839,749	39,824,312	0	0	0	0	0	2,684,392	27,791,890	26,539,155	114%
HAWAII	<2,550,620>	886,228	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	<3,436,848>	-12%
IDAHO	6,630,196	1,523,465	593,381	0	0	0	0	94,724	0	4,418,626	100%
ILLINOIS	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
INDIANA	10,130,637	0	110,690	0	0	0	0	0	0	10,019,947	42%
IOWA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
KANSAS	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
KENTUCKY	3,649,326	249,119	<47,300>	0	0	0	0	0	0	3,447,507	99%
LOUISIANA	106,576,144	13,272,699	3,089,151	3,545,338	0	0	0	20,935,798	0	65,733,158	99%
MAINE	2,780,404	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2,780,404	100%
MARYLAND	9,017,124	21,460,509	20,000	<15,026,293>	0	0	0	0	0	2,562,908	13%
MASSACHUSETTS	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MICHIGAN	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MINNESOTA	71,239,784	43,570,690	13,827	2,992,309	0	0	0	<193,314>	0	24,856,272	51%
MISSISSIPPI	30,417,521	3,339,059	4,008,904	1,241,571	0	0	0	0	0	21,827,987	71%
MISSOURI	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MONTANA	991,869	974,963	62,819	17,813	<2,282>	0	0	0	5,325	<66,769>	4%
NEBRASKA	3,668,384	2,425,424	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1,242,960	29%
NEVADA	7,157,001	711,479	0	0	0	0	0	0	1,206,958	5,238,564	27%
NEW HAMPSHIRE	<468>	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	<416>	<52>	0%
NEW JERSEY	126,467,363	58,724,157	0	837,906	0	10,350,000	0	2,455,611	0	54,099,689	37%
NEW MEXICO	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEW YORK	259,296,447	90,310,873	0	9,004,080	0	0	0	0	728,428	159,253,066	51%
NORTH CAROLINA	71,658,706	2,129,206	243,229	139,357	0	0	0	799,485	56,272,346	12,075,083	100%
NORTH DAKOTA	1,381,290	197,615	417,498	171,329	0	0	0	0	3,621	591,227	28%
OHIO	11,926,721	4,905,186	0	708,942	0	0	0	4,100,909	0	2,211,684	80%
OKLAHOMA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
OREGON	16,101,819	315,530	0	71,205	0	0	0	0	0	15,715,084	82%
PENNSYLVANIA	336,607,449	60,607,266	106,106	3,050,975	0	0	0	2,368,236	250,718,771	19,756,095	68%
RHODE ISLAND	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
SOUTH CAROLINA	11,039,760	8,128,078	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2,911,682	100%
SOUTH DAKOTA	2,391,402	1,478,133	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	913,269	100%
TENNESSEE	11,195,829	6,095,567	166,435	1,615,105	18,994	0	0	0	0	3,299,728	19%
TEXAS	55,577,390	19,882,322	0	6,836,272	3,602,240	0	0	136,000	<2,969>	25,123,525	37%
UTAH	3,410,155	329,402	0	27,330	0	0	0	0	0	3,053,423	8%
VERMONT	857,154	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	857,154	15%
VIRGINIA	<2,235,670>	<1,294,369>	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	<941,301>	-7%
WASHINGTON	49,046,629	37,334,580	<21,663>	2,527,686	241,884	0	0	0	0	8,964,142	47%
WEST VIRGINIA	19,496,903	4,706,132	0	176,402	0	0	0	0	0	14,614,369	48%
WISCONSIN	3,812,321	857,189	<2,151>	<91,172>	142,190	0	0	183,872	0	2,722,393	-381232100%
WYOMING	4,412,881	904	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	4,411,977	97%
Total	1,652,554,314	447,036,163	132,121,404	25,380,152	4,035,085	10,350,000	0	33,565,713	328,017,069	672,048,728	-
Percentages 1/	100%	27%	8%	2%	0%	1%	0%	2%	20%	41%	-
Percentages 2/	48%	13%	4%	1%	0%	0%	0%	1%	10%	20%	-

1/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total expenditures on non-assistance (Line 6).

2/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures (Line 7).An abnormal negative percentage is the result of the total expenditures on non-assistance being a negative value. An abnormal positive percentage is the result of total expenditures being less than that of expenditures on non-assistance.