TANF Financial Data

TANF FINANCIAL DATA

Table A3 - FY 2000 FEDERAL FUNDS SPENT IN FY 2002
EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE IN FY 2002 THROUGH THE FOURTH QUARTER

**Data reported by States in Column A on Form ACF-196 Line Items**

STATE	LINE 6 TOTAL EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE	Line 6a WORK RELATED ACTIVITIES	Line 6b CHILD CARE	Line 6c TRANSPORTATION	Line 6d IDA	Line 6e REFUNDABLE EITC	Line 6f OTHER REFUNDABLE TAX CREDIT	Line 6g NON-RECUR SHORT-TERM BENEFITS	Line 6i NON-ASSIST SOLELY UNDER PRIOR LAW	Total of Other Categories of Non-Assistance Lines 6h - 6m	% OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES SPENT ON NON ASSISTANCE 2/
ALABAMA	4,208,825	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	4,208,825	15%
ALASKA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ARIZONA	212,915	<355>	0	0	0	0	0	0	<22,552>	235,822	2%
ARKANSAS	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
CALIFORNIA	<428,060,290>	<737,730>	<707,479>	444,990	0	0	0	0	0	<427,060,071>	-3978%
COLORADO	1,340,554	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1,340,554	26%
CONNECTICUT	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
DELAWARE	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
DIST.OF COLUMBIA	24,465,927	3,166,160	1,881,041	0	0	0	0	0	0	19,418,726	100%
FLORIDA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
GEORGIA	18,590,941	7,342,341	0	0	0	0	0	0	6,279,807	4,968,793	106%
HAWAII	1,924,436	202,576	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1,721,860	70%
IDAHO	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ILLINOIS	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
INDIANA	7,168,988	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	7,168,988	31%
IOWA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
KANSAS	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
KENTUCKY	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
LOUISIANA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MAINE	1,344,238	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1,344,238	100%
MARYLAND	76,471	75,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1,471	0%
MASSACHUSETTS	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MICHIGAN	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MINNESOTA	5,655,809	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5,655,809	21%
MISSISSIPPI	<30,798>	<42,884>	<174,403>	0	0	0	0	0	0	186,489	0%
MISSOURI	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MONTANA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEBRASKA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEVADA	113,611	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	113,611	1%
NEW HAMPSHIRE	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEW JERSEY	9,230,086	8,252,615	0	576	0	0	0	102,764	0	874,131	10%
NEW MEXICO	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEW YORK	14,622,852	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	<3,522>	14,626,374	53%
NORTH CAROLINA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NORTH DAKOTA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
OHIO	<25,808,489>	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	<25,808,489>	-31%
OKLAHOMA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
OREGON	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
PENNSYLVANIA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
RHODE ISLAND	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
SOUTH CAROLINA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
SOUTH DAKOTA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
TENNESSEE	6,817,265	0	6,817,265	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	37%
TEXAS	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
UTAH	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
VERMONT	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
VIRGINIA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
WASHINGTON	<24,476>	0	<25,984>	0	0	0	0	<2>	15,675,557	<15,674,047>	0%
WEST VIRGINIA	6,117,072	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6,117,072	17%
WISCONSIN	267,671	2,807,744	<7,184,409>	1,867,814	0	0	0	0	0	2,776,522	15%
WYOMING	<133,857>	728,153	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	<862,010>	100%
Total	<351,900,249>	21,793,620	606,031	2,313,380	0	0	0	102,762	21,929,290	<398,645,332>	-
Percentages 1/	100%	-6%	0%	-1%	0%	0%	0%	0%	-6%	113%	-
Percentages 2/	-59%	4%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	4%	-67%	-

1/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total expenditures on non-assistance (Line 6).

2/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures (Line 7).An abnormal negative percentage is the result of the total expenditures on non-assistance being a negative value. An abnormal positive percentage is the result of total expenditures being less than that of expenditures on non-assistance.