Skip Navigation  
acfbanner  
blueline
Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      

TANF Financial Data > FY 2003 TANF Financial Data


TANF FINANCIAL DATA


Table A3 - FY 2001 FEDERAL FUNDS SPENT IN FY 2003
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ON ASSISTANCE IN FY 2003 THROUGH THE FOURTH QUARTER

Data reported by States in Column A on Form ACF-196 Line Items

STATE Line 5
TOTAL
EXPENDITURES
ON
ASSISTANCE		 Line 5a
BASIC ASSISTANCE		 Line 5b
CHILD CARE		 Line 5c
TRANSPORTATION		 Line 5d
ASSISTANCE
UNDER PRIOR
LAW		 % OF TOTAL
EXPENDITURES
SPENT ON
ASSISTANCE
ALABAMA 47,082,159 44,921,372 36,332 2,124,455 0 89%
ALASKA 0 0 0 0 0 0%
ARIZONA 26,380,207 26,380,207 0 0 0 89%
ARKANSAS 1,706,822 1,706,822 0 0 0 100%
CALIFORNIA <7,014,014> <3,855,785> <545,267> 0 <2,612,962> 0%
COLORADO 0 0 0 0 0 0%
CONNECTICUT 0 0 0 0 0 0%
DELAWARE 352 0 0 352 0 100%
DIST.OF COLUMBIA 4,379,748 4,379,748 0 0 0 82%
FLORIDA 16,435,864 16,434,762 1,102 0 0 91%
GEORGIA 68,645,513 68,671,010 0 <25,497> 0 100%
HAWAII 2,779,176 2,779,176 0 0 0 100%
IDAHO 0 0 0 0 0 0%
ILLINOIS 0 0 0 0 0 0%
INDIANA <1,265,481> 11,273 0 <1,276,754> 0 -192%
IOWA 78,927 78,927 0 0 0 0%
KANSAS 0 0 0 0 0 0%
KENTUCKY 0 0 0 0 0 0%
LOUISIANA 10,921,379 10,750,194 0 171,185 0 104%
MAINE <1,747,029> <1,747,029> 0 0 0 100%
MARYLAND 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MASSACHUSETTS <3,965,617> <3,965,617> 0 0 0 0%
MICHIGAN 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MINNESOTA 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MISSISSIPPI <1,531,429> 0 0 <1,531,429> 0 868%
MISSOURI 0 0 0 0 0 0%
MONTANA 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEBRASKA 2,031,552 2,031,552 0 0 0 100%
NEVADA 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEW HAMPSHIRE 1,662,880 2,728,143 0 0 <1,065,263> 100%
NEW JERSEY <3,328,313> <3,446,401> 0 118,088 0 -31%
NEW MEXICO 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NEW YORK 14,696,990 <17,666,713> 0 0 32,363,703 113%
NORTH CAROLINA 0 0 0 0 0 0%
NORTH DAKOTA 6,239,294 3,843,480 0 0 2,395,814 96%
OHIO 50,107,464 50,107,464 0 0 0 100%
OKLAHOMA 74,152,246 26,600,324 26,705,035 15,671,866 5,175,021 100%
OREGON 0 0 0 0 0 0%
PENNSYLVANIA 42,341,699 42,341,699 0 0 0 101%
RHODE ISLAND 0 0 0 0 0 0%
SOUTH CAROLINA 0 0 0 0 0 0%
SOUTH DAKOTA 85,556 85,556 0 0 0 100%
TENNESSEE 2,678,942 2,678,942 0 0 0 100%
TEXAS 65,708,173 65,691,310 0 52,508 <35,645> 81%
UTAH 6,021,580 5,941,326 57,755 22,499 0 98%
VERMONT 0 0 0 0 0 0%
VIRGINIA 0 0 0 0 0 0%
WASHINGTON 0 0 0 0 0 0%
WEST VIRGINIA 0 0 0 0 0 0%
WISCONSIN 1,127,190 1,127,190 0 0 0 112719000%
WYOMING 2,337,198 2,337,198 0 0 0 23%
TOTAL 428,749,028 350,946,130 26,254,957 15,327,273 36,220,668 -
Percentages 1/ 100% 82% 6% 4% 8% -
Percentages 2/ 88% 72% 5% 3% 7% -
1/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures on assistance.
2/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures (Line 7). An abnormal negative
percentage is the result of the total expenditures on assistance being a negative value. An abnormal positive percentage
is the result of total expenditures being less than that of expenditures on assistance.


Last Updated: July 13, 2004