TANF Financial Data

TANF FINANCIAL DATA

Table A4 - FY 1999 FEDERAL FUNDS SPENT IN FY 2002
EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE IN FY 2002 THROUGH THE FOURTH QUARTER

**Data reported by States in Column A on Form ACF-196 Line Items**

STATE	LINE 6 TOTAL EXPENDITURES ON NON-ASSISTANCE	Line 6a WORK RELATED ACTIVITIES	Line 6b CHILD CARE	Line 6c TRANSPORTATION	Line 6d IDA	Line 6e REFUNDABLE EITC	Line 6f OTHER REFUNDABLE TAX CREDIT	Line 6g NON-RECUR SHORT-TERM BENEFITS	Line 6i NON-ASSIST SOLELY UNDER PRIOR LAW	Total of Other Categories of Non-Assistance Lines 6h - 6m	% OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES SPENT ON NON ASSISTANCE 2/
ALABAMA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ALASKA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ARIZONA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ARKANSAS	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
CALIFORNIA	5,673	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5,673	1%
COLORADO	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
CONNECTICUT	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
DELAWARE	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
DIST.OF COLUMBIA	10,698,516	5,198,516	5,500,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	100%
FLORIDA	103,287,525	79,151,512	234,253	6,220,061	0	0	0	0	0	17,681,699	98%
GEORGIA	27,364,387	4,363,679	0	211,526	0	0	0	0	22,554,397	234,785	70%
HAWAII	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
IDAHO	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ILLINOIS	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
INDIANA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
IOWA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
KANSAS	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
KENTUCKY	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
LOUISIANA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MAINE	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MARYLAND	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MASSACHUSETTS	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MICHIGAN	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MINNESOTA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MISSISSIPPI	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MISSOURI	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MONTANA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEBRASKA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEVADA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEW HAMPSHIRE	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEW JERSEY	<12,435,869>	<12,890,431>	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	454,562	116%
NEW MEXICO	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEW YORK	65,154,243	56,755,226	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	8,399,017	92%
NORTH CAROLINA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NORTH DAKOTA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
OHIO	3,325,425	10,308	6,701,014	4,401	0	0	0	143,391	0	<3,533,689>	100%
OKLAHOMA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
OREGON	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
PENNSYLVANIA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
RHODE ISLAND	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
SOUTH CAROLINA	4,395,785	4,395,785	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	100%
SOUTH DAKOTA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
TENNESSEE	1,521,576	0	0	1,521,576	0	0	0	0	0	0	22%
TEXAS	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
UTAH	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
VERMONT	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
VIRGINIA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
WASHINGTON	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0%
WEST VIRGINIA	2,896,041	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2,896,041	11%
WISCONSIN	11,994,516	1,872,001	0	2,554,748	0	0	0	597,008	0	6,970,759	12%
WYOMING	<25,298>	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	<25,298>	100%
Total	218,182,520	138,856,596	12,435,267	10,512,312	0	0	0	740,399	22,554,397	33,083,549	-
Percentages 1/	100%	64%	6%	5%	0%	0%	0%	0%	10%	15%	-
Percentages 2/	56%	36%	3%	3%	0%	0%	0%	0%	6%	8%	-

1/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total expenditures on non-assistance (Line 6).

2/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures (Line 7).An abnormal negative percentage is the result of the total expenditures on non-assistance being a negative value. An abnormal positive percentage is the result of total expenditures being less than that of expenditures on non-assistance.