TANF Financial Data

TANF FINANCIAL DATA

Table A6 - FY 1997 FEDERAL FUNDS SPENT IN FY 2002
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ON ASSISTANCE IN FY 2002 THROUGH THE FOURTH QUARTER

**Data reported by States in Column A on Form ACF-196 Line Items**

STATE	Line 5 TOTAL EXPENDITURES ON ASSISTANCE	Line 5a BASIC ASSISTANCE	Line 5b CHILD CARE	Line 5c TRANSPORTATION	Line 5d ASSISTANCE UNDER PRIOR LAW	% OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES SPENT ON ASSISTANCE
ALABAMA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ALASKA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ARIZONA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ARKANSAS	0	0	0	0	0	0%
CALIFORNIA	29,486	29,486	0	0	0	0%
COLORADO	0	0	0	0	0	0%
CONNECTICUT	0	0	0	0	0	0%
DELAWARE	0	0	0	0	0	0%
DIST.OF COLUMBIA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
FLORIDA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
GEORGIA	<9,685,689>	<4,378,815>	0	<5,306,874>	0	-8122%
HAWAII	0	0	0	0	0	0%
IDAHO	0	0	0	0	0	0%
ILLINOIS	0	0	0	0	0	0%
INDIANA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
IOWA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
KANSAS	0	0	0	0	0	0%
KENTUCKY	0	0	0	0	0	0%
LOUISIANA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MAINE	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MARYLAND	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MASSACHUSETTS	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MICHIGAN	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MINNESOTA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MISSISSIPPI	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MISSOURI	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MONTANA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEBRASKA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEVADA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEW HAMPSHIRE	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEW JERSEY	60,513	60,513	0	0	0	0%
NEW MEXICO	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NEW YORK	6,599	6,599	0	0	0	1%
NORTH CAROLINA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
NORTH DAKOTA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
OHIO	0	0	0	0	0	0%
OKLAHOMA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
OREGON	0	0	0	0	0	0%
PENNSYLVANIA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
RHODE ISLAND	0	0	0	0	0	0%
SOUTH CAROLINA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
SOUTH DAKOTA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
TENNESSEE	0	0	0	0	0	0%
TEXAS	0	0	0	0	0	0%
UTAH	0	0	0	0	0	0%
VERMONT	0	0	0	0	0	0%
VIRGINIA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
WASHINGTON	0	0	0	0	0	0%
WEST VIRGINIA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
WISCONSIN	0	0	0	0	0	0%
WYOMING	0	<2,620,359>	2,620,359	0	0	0%
TOTAL	<9,589,091>	<6,902,576>	2,620,359	<5,306,874>	0	-
Percentages 1/	100%	72%	-27%	55%	0%	-
Percentages 2/	67%	48%	-18%	37%	0%	-

1/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures on assistance.

2/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures (Line 7). An abnormal negative
percentage is the result of the total expenditures on assistance being a negative value. An abnormal positive percentage
is the result of total expenditures being less than that of expenditures on assistance.