Appendix C: Comparison of Full and Restricted NSAF Samples
The generalizability of the results in this report to the national population of low-income families using non-parental child care depends on the extent to which such families living in communities with relatively high rates of child poverty are similar to all such families. To address this question, we conducted a supplementary analysis of the National Survey of American Families (NSAF), which collected data on some of the same topics. With the assistance of staff at the Urban Institute, we identified NSAF sample members living in counties with rates of child poverty above 13.8 percent (the “restricted” sample). We then performed a number of tabulations on both the full and restricted samples, the results of which are reported below. The respective sample sizes are 3,918 and 2,820.
The results from the NSAF restricted sample have been alluded to in Chapters 3 and 4. In some cases they differ substantively from those of the community sample. For example, our survey found a much greater difference between Black and Hispanic families in their relative preference for center care versus family child care. The purpose of this appendix, however, is simply to compare the full and restricted samples within the NSAF. We suggest that, to the extent that the sample restriction makes little difference in the NSAF, we can infer that it made little difference in our survey; that is, that we would have very similar results if we had included all low-income families in our sample frame.
The exhibits in this appendix show that restricting the sample makes no practical difference in the measures of either background characteristics or outcomes. The biggest difference, four percentage points, is seen with respect to race/ethnicity: unsurprisingly, among low-income families, Blacks are relatively more likely and Whites less likely to live in higher-child-poverty counties. Also, current subsidy recipients are a little more common in the restricted sample (17%) than in the full sample (15%).
The marginals of the remaining tables are nearly identical in the restricted and unrestricted sample. For 2-way tables, sizeable differences are occasionally seen in columns that are based on small samples—e.g., the primary mode of care for families whose race/ethnicity is "other" in the full NSAF sample is 16 percent for a non-relative in the non-relative's home, and 8 percent for a non-relative in the child’s home; in the restricted sample, the primary mode is 10 percent in each of these categories. But for the major columns of the table (Black, White, Hispanic) the distributions are quite similar. Certainly the qualitative results are unaltered.
This analysis strongly supports the notion that restricting our analysis to children in higher-child-poverty counties did not markedly affect our results.
Exhibit C.1
Household Type
| |
Full Sample (% of families) |
Restricted Sample (% of families) |
| Couple |
48.6 |
47.2 |
| Mother and other adults |
14.8 |
15.5 |
| Single mother |
36.6 |
37.3 |
| Note: This table corresponds to Exhibit 3.1. |
Exhibit C.2
Number of Children in Household
| |
Full Sample (% of families) |
Restricted Sample (% of families) |
| One |
19.8 |
20.0 |
| Two |
36.6 |
37.8 |
| Three |
26.9 |
25.5 |
| Four or more |
16.7 |
16.7 |
| Note: This table corresponds to Exhibit 3.2. |
Exhibit C.3
Family Ethnicity
| |
Full Sample (% of families) |
Restricted Sample (% of families) |
| Non-Hispanic White |
46.8 |
43.0 |
| Non-Hispanic Black |
28.5 |
32.1 |
| Hispanic |
20.4 |
21.1 |
| Other/Multiple |
4.3 |
3.8 |
| Note: This table corresponds to Exhibit 3.4. |
Exhibit C.4
Immigrant Status of Family
| |
Full Sample (% of families) |
Restricted Sample (% of families) |
| Born in US |
86.1 |
85.9 |
| Naturalized Citizen |
4.7 |
4.6 |
| Non-US Citizen |
9.2 |
9.5 |
| Note: This table corresponds to Exhibit 3.5. |
Exhibit C.5
Primary Mode of Non-Parental Child Care
| Mode of Care |
Full Sample (% of families) |
Restricted Sample (% of families) |
| Center care |
28.2 |
28.8 |
| Care by a relative in the child's own home |
30.4 |
29.6 |
| Care by a relative in relative's home 1 |
23.0 |
24.6 |
| Family child care 2 |
13.0 |
12.1 |
| Care by an unrelated adult in child’s own home |
5.4 |
4.9 |
|
Note: This table corresponds to Exhibit 4.1.
According to the NSAF:
Care by a relative not in child’s home.
Care by an unrelated adult not in child’s own home. |
Exhibit C.6
Primary Mode of Non-Parental Child Care by Age of Child
Full Sample
| Mode of Care |
Age of Child |
| Under One Year (%) |
Age 1-2 (%) |
Age 3-4 (%) |
Age 5-12 (%) |
All Ages (%) |
| Center care |
6.7 |
31.9 |
50.4 |
23.3 |
28.2 |
| Care by a relative in the child's own home |
37.6 |
20.9 |
11.5 |
37.0 |
30.4 |
| Care by a relative in relative's home1 |
36.6 |
25.5 |
21.5 |
21.6 |
23.0 |
| Family child care2 |
17.8 |
17.6 |
13.7 |
11.3 |
13.0 |
| Care by an unrelated adult in child’s own home |
1.4 |
4.2 |
2.9 |
6.7 |
5.4 |
| Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Restricted Sample
| Mode of Care |
Age of Child |
| Under One Year (%) |
Age 1-2 (%) |
Age 3-4 (%) |
Age 5-12 (%) |
All Ages (%) |
| Center care |
7.6 |
31.8 |
51.4 |
24.0 |
28.8 |
| Care by a relative in the child’s own home |
35.6 |
19.3 |
10.3 |
36.7 |
29.6 |
| Care by a relative in relative’s home1 |
35.2 |
28.5 |
22.3 |
23.3 |
24.6 |
| Family child care2 |
20.5 |
15.9 |
12.8 |
10.2 |
12.1 |
| Care by an unrelated adult in child’s own home |
1.2 |
4.4 |
3.3 |
5.7 |
4.9 |
| Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Note: This table corresponds to Exhibit 4.2.
According to the NSAF:
Care by a relative not in child’s home.
Care by an unrelated adult not in child’s own home. |
Exhibit C.7
Primary Mode of Non-Parental Child Care by Ethnicity
Full Sample
| Mode of Care |
Family Ethnicity |
| White (%) |
Black (%) |
Hispanic (%) |
All (%) |
| Center care |
25.0 |
32.5 |
28.5 |
28.2 |
| Care by a relative in the child’s own home |
26.8 |
31.5 |
38.2 |
30.4 |
| Care by a relative in relative’s home1 |
26.1 |
21.8 |
18.6 |
23.0 |
| Family child care2 |
16.8 |
8.4 |
10.0 |
13.0 |
| Care by an unrelated adult in child’s own home |
5.2 |
5.8 |
4.8 |
5.4 |
| Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Restricted Sample
| Mode of Care |
Family Ethnicity |
| White (%) |
Black (%) |
Hispanic (%) |
All (%) |
| Center care |
25.9 |
32.7 |
27.6 |
28.8 |
| Care by a relative in the child’s own home |
24.7 |
31.4 |
37.3 |
29.6 |
| Care by a relative in relative’s home1 |
29.4 |
22.0 |
20.2 |
24.6 |
| Family child care2 |
16.3 |
8.5 |
9.3 |
12.1 |
| Care by an unrelated adult in child’s own home |
3.7 |
5.4 |
5.6 |
4.9 |
| Total |
100.00 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Note: This table corresponds to Exhibit 4.3.
According to the NSAF:
Care by a relative not in child’s home.
Care by an unrelated adult not in child’s own home. |
Exhibit C.8
Number and Type of Non-Parental Child Care Arrangements, by Age of Child
Full Sample
| |
Age of Child |
| Under One Year (%) |
Age 1-2 (%) |
Age 3-4 (%) |
Age 5-12 (%) |
Total |
| Number of arrangements |
1 |
73.0 |
75.5 |
58.6 |
75.8 |
72.8 |
| 2 |
26.4 |
20.9 |
35.6 |
21.4 |
23.9 |
| 3 |
0.6 |
3.7 |
5.7 |
2.8 |
3.3 |
| Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
| Any of child's arrangements is: |
Center care |
7.1 |
32.9 |
58.4 |
32.5 |
35.5 |
| Care by a relative in the child’s own home |
50.6 |
30.7 |
29.2 |
43.1 |
39.4 |
| Care by a relative in relative’s home1 |
46.4 |
35.1 |
35.2 |
27.0 |
30.6 |
| Family child care2 |
19.0 |
19.5 |
17.1 |
14.3 |
15.8 |
| Care by an unrelated adult in child’s own home |
4.4 |
7.5 |
7.2 |
9.6 |
8.6 |
|
Restricted Sample
| |
Age of Child |
| Under One Year (%) |
Age 1-2 (%) |
Age 3-4 (%) |
Age 5-12 (%) |
Total |
| Number of arrangements |
1 |
75.1 |
74.3 |
58.0 |
76.2 |
72.8 |
| 2 |
24.6 |
21.3 |
35.7 |
21.3 |
23.9 |
| 3 |
0.7 |
4.5 |
6.3 |
2.5 |
3.3 |
| Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
| Any of child's arrangements is: |
Center care |
8.1 |
33.6 |
57.9 |
33.3 |
36.0 |
| Care by a relative in the child’s own home |
45.1 |
31.2 |
30.6 |
42.8 |
39.2 |
| Care by a relative in relative’s home1 |
45.7 |
39.1 |
36.0 |
28.8 |
32.5 |
| Family child care2 |
21.8 |
18.5 |
16.5 |
12.6 |
14.6 |
| Care by an unrelated adult in child’s own home |
5.0 |
7.7 |
7.3 |
8.5 |
8.0 |
|
Note: This table corresponds to Exhibit 4.4.
According to the NSAF
Care by a relative not in child’s home.
Care by an unrelated adult not in child’s own home. |
Exhibit C.9
Total Hours Per Week of Non-Parental Child Care, by Age of Child
Full Sample
| |
Age of Child |
| Under One Year (%) |
Age 1-2 (%) |
Age 3-4 (%) |
Age 5-12 (%) |
Total (%) |
| Less than 10 |
29.6 |
19.2 |
9.4 |
34.6 |
27.9 |
| 10 to 20 |
17.7 |
8.7 |
13.6 |
28.7 |
22.7 |
| 21 to 30 |
7.6 |
12.4 |
16.5 |
13.0 |
13.2 |
| Over 30 |
45.1 |
59.7 |
60.4 |
23.7 |
36.2 |
| Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Restricted Sample
| |
Age of Child |
| Under One Year (%) |
Age 1-2 (%) |
Age 3-4 (%) |
Age 5-12 (%) |
Total (%) |
| Less than 10 |
26.5 |
18.2 |
7.8 |
32.8 |
26.2 |
| 10 to 20 |
16.8 |
8.7 |
15.1 |
30.7 |
24.1 |
| 21 to 30 |
8.2 |
11.7 |
15.0 |
13.2 |
13.0 |
| Over 30 |
48.5 |
61.2 |
62.1 |
23.3 |
36.8 |
| Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
| Note: This table corresponds to Exhibit 4.5. |
Exhibit C.10
Subsidy Status of Families
| |
Full Sample (% of families) |
Restricted Sample (% of families) |
| Current |
15.4 |
17.0 |
| Former |
5.0 |
5.4 |
| Never applied |
56.9 |
55.6 |
| Did not receive |
5.5 |
5.5 |
| Pending |
1.0 |
1.0 |
| Don't know |
16.2 |
15.6 |
| Note: This table corresponds to Exhibit 4.14. |
Exhibit C.11
Subsidy Status, by Mode of Care
Full Sample
| Mode of Care |
Family Ethnicity |
| Current |
Former |
Never applied |
Did not receive |
Pending |
Don't Know |
| Center care |
30.8 |
5.9 |
39.4 |
6.9 |
1.7 |
15.3 |
| Care by a relative in the child’s own home |
6.1 |
5.3 |
70.9 |
3.6 |
0.4 |
14.0 |
| Care by a relative in relative’s home1 |
9.3 |
3.1 |
63.3 |
6.4 |
1.2 |
16.7 |
| Family child care2 |
17.0 |
6.1 |
52.7 |
5.0 |
0.5 |
18.8 |
| Care by an unrelated adult in child’s own home |
9.6 |
5.0 |
49.3 |
7.0 |
1.9 |
27.3 |
|
Restricted Sample
| Mode of Care |
Family Ethnicity |
| Current |
Former |
Never applied |
Did not receive |
Pending |
Don't Know |
| Center care |
32.4 |
5.9 |
39.1 |
6.6 |
1.8 |
14.2 |
| Care by a relative in the child’s own home |
7.6 |
6 |
68.5 |
2.8 |
0.2 |
14.6 |
| Care by a relative in relative’s home1 |
9.8 |
2.9 |
64.6 |
6.5 |
0.8 |
15.4 |
| Family child care2 |
20.0 |
6.6 |
50.0 |
6.1 |
0.5 |
16.8 |
| Care by an unrelated adult in child’s own home |
12.6 |
6.6 |
41.9 |
7.9 |
2.7 |
28.4 |
|
Note: This table corresponds to Exhibit 4.15.
According to the NSAF
Care by a relative not in child’s home.
Care by an unrelated adult not in child’s own home. |
UI staff described their procedure to ensure confidentiality as follows, in a private communication:
To avoid compromising confidentiality we switched the binary value on the county child poverty variable for a total of 12 counties … 7 counties with rates of child poverty of less than 13.8 percent received a value of 1 (or poor) for the county child poverty flag. Five counties with child poverty rates above 13.8 percent received a value of 0 (or non-poor) for the county child poverty flag. In all, the changes affected 51 focal children in 8 different states. (
back)
In the full NSAF sample, Whites are 47 percent and Blacks are 28 percent of the total. In the restricted sample, Whites are 43 percent and Blacks are 32 percent (Exhibit C.3). (
back)