Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      

Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE) skip to primary page content
Advanced
Search

 Table of Contents | Previous | Next

D.4 VERIFYING FINDINGS BY PROGRAM APPROACH AND IMPLEMENTATION LEVEL

This appendix provides details beyond those discussed in the body of this report on the impact findings by program approach and implementation level. Our main conclusions about the extent to which impacts differed by program approach and by implementation level are supported by the impact findings presented here.

For our primary analysis of Early Head Start impacts by program approach, we analyzed three subgroups in which the program approach (center-based, home-based, and mixed approach) was defined according to how programs were delivering services at the time of the fall 1997 site visits (see Chapter I). To confirm these findings, we also created three subgroups defined on the basis of the configuration of services that programs provided to families between 1997 and 1999. Under this second definition, we combined the mixed-approach programs that offered a relatively small number of child care slots (fewer than 25) with the home-based programs to form a group of "mostly home-based" programs. The 15-month parent services follow-up interview data confirm that only a small percentage of families in these mixed-approach programs reported receiving Early Head Start center-based services.

To examine results by level of implementation, it was important to hold program approach constant. We did this by comparing impacts for (1) the 3 early-implemented and 3 not-early-implemented mixed-approach programs using the 1997 definition, and (2) the 3 early-, 4 late-, and 3 incompletely implemented programs that were mostly home-based.6 This approach is preferable to comparing estimated impacts for all implementers to those of all nonimplementers because it holds program approach constant. This is important, because the proportion of implemented programs differed substantially by program approach. For example, using the 1997 definition, only 1 of the 7 home-based programs was an early implementer, as compared to 2 of the 4 center-based programs and 3 of the 6 mixed-approach programs. Thus, comparing all implementers to all nonimplementers confounds impact differences by implementation level with differences by program approach. Because of sample size constraints, we limited our analysis to the mixed-approach programs using the 1997 definition and the mostly home-based programs using the later definition.

For all analyses, we also examined the proportion of sites within a subgroup that had beneficial impacts, to assess whether the impact results were due to a small number of sites with large impacts, or to most sites within the subgroup. We believe that subgroup results are more credible if impacts are spread uniformly across programs within the subgroup.7

To keep the presentation manageable, we focused on selected key child, parenting, and family outcomes spanning a range of types of outcomes: (1) Bayley MDI and the percentage with scores below 85 at 24 months of age; (3) MacArthur vocabulary production and sentence complexity at 24 months; (4) CBCL aggressiveness scale at 24 months; (5) engagement, negativity, attention span, parental supportiveness, and parental detachment measures from the parent-child structured play assessments at 24 months; (6) KIDI at 24 months; (7) FES family conflict scale at 24 months; (8) the HOME language/literacy support scale at 24 months; (9) parenting stress index at 24 months; and (10) the percentage and hours per week the caregiver spent in education or training during the 15 months after random assignment. The analysis results are presented in Tables D.4A to D.4H.

Our conclusions are as follows:

  1. Center-based programs had beneficial effects on cognitive development outcomes, but had no effects on language development or parenting outcomes (Tables D.4A to D.4D). The estimated impacts on the Bayley measures are statistically significant at the 10 percent level and translate into effect sizes of about 20 percent. Estimated impacts on Bayley MDI scores are positive in all 4 center-based sites. However, none of the estimated impacts on the language and parenting measures is statistically significant, and many have the "wrong" sign. Furthermore, the MacArthur language and the parenting impacts are similar in the 2 center-based programs with a large percentage of Hispanic families and the 2 non-Hispanic center-based programs. Thus, these results (and the language ones in particular) are not due to the inclusion of programs that largely serve Hispanic families.8

  2. Home-based programs had beneficial effects on language development and parenting outcomes, but had no effects on cognitive development (Tables D.4A to D.4D). Impacts on the MacArthur vocabulary production measure are statistically significant for the 7 home-based programs using the 1997 definition and for the 10 home-based programs using the service configuration definition. In both cases, the impact in effect size units is about 15 percent, and about 60 percent of the sites within each group had positive impacts. The impact on the MacArthur sentence complexity measure is statistically significant at the 5 percent level for the 10 programs (7 of which had positive impacts) and is positive, although not statistically significant for the 7 programs using the 1997 definition. The impacts on Bayley scores are small using both definitions, which suggests that home-based programs had at most a small effect on cognitive development in the short term.

  3. Home-based programs improved parenting outcomes using either definition of home-based programs. Six of the 11 parenting outcomes were statistically significant using the 1997 definition, and 9 of the 11 were statistically significant using the service configuration definition. (The difference in these findings is due to the fact that the 3 mixed-approach programs that were defined as home-based under the configuration-of-services definition had large beneficial impacts.) Beneficial impacts were typically found in 70 to 80 percent of the programs.
    It is very important to note that beneficial program impacts were found in the home-based programs even though many of these programs were not fully implemented. Of the 7 programs using the 1997 definition, only 1 was fully implemented early, 3 were implemented later, and 3 were incompletely implemented. The early/late/incomplete split for the 10 programs using the configuration-of-services definition was 3/4/3.

  4. Mixed-approach programs had beneficial effects on language and parenting outcomes and small effects on cognitive development (Tables D.4A to D.4D). Nearly all the estimated impacts on language and parenting outcomes (12 of 14) were statistically significant at the 10 percent level for the 6 mixed-approach programs using the 1997 definition. Importantly, the magnitude of the impacts using the 3 mixed-approach programs defined using the configuration-of-services definition were very similar to those for the 6 mixed-approach programs using the initial 1997 definition. Because of smaller sample sizes, fewer of the impacts for the 3 mixed-approach programs were statistically significant. Thus, the relabeling of the three 1997 mixed-approach programs to largely home-based service configurations did not change the results materially for the mixed-approach programs.

  5. The Bayley impacts were positive overall, but only about one-half of the 6 original 1997 mixed-approach programs had positive values, so there is no clear evidence that mixed-approach programs improved child cognitive development at 24 months.

  6. There is evidence that implementation matters (Tables D.4E to D.4H). The comparison of impacts of the 3 early-implemented 1997 mixed-approach programs and the other 3 mixed-approach programs strongly suggests that early implementation matters. Except for the self-sufficiency measures, the child and parent outcomes are typically larger for the early implementers, more are statistically significant, and a larger percentage of early-implemented programs had beneficial impacts. Furthermore, there is some evidence that the early-implemented mixed-approach programs improved Bayley scores.
  7. The evidence is more mixed when comparing impact findings for the 3 early-, 4 later- and 3 incompletely implemented home-based programs using the service configuration definition. In general, the impacts for the early (in particular) and the late implementers are larger than for the incomplete-implementers. However, this pattern does not hold for impacts on the MacArthur vocabulary production, the Family Conflict (FES) measure, the HOME measure, and the self-sufficiency measures. Furthermore, the proportions of early-implemented programs with beneficial impacts across the outcome measures are not systematically greater than those of later-implemented programs. This suggests that the beneficial results for the early-implemented programs were driven by a small number of sites.

TABLE D.4A
IMPACT ESTIMATES PER PARTICIPANT FOR KEY OUTCOMES, BY PROGRAM APPROACH USING THE 1997 DEFINITION
Variable
Center-Based
(4 Sites)
Home-Based
(7 Sites)
Mixed
(6 Sites)
Bayley Mental Development Index (MDI) at 24 Months of Age
2.94*
1.09
1.51
Percent with Bayley MDI Below 85 at 24 Months
-11.81*
-0.99
-7.01
Vocabulary Production at 24 Months
-1.38
2.98*
4.36**
Sentence Complexity Score at 24 Months
-0.45
0.67
2.31***
Aggressive Behavior Problems At 24 Months (CBCL)
-1.84
-0.30
-1.97**
Engagement of Parent at 24 Months (Three Bag)
-0.09
0.02
0.27**
Negativity Towards Parent at 24 Months (Three Bag)
-0.01
-0.02
-0.17
Sustained Attention with Objects at 24 Months (Three Bag)
-0.13
0.04
0.17*
Parental Supportiveness at 24 Months (Three Bag)
-0.05
0.14*
0.23**
Parental Detachment at 24 Months (Three Bag)
0.08
-0.14*
-0.16**
Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory (KIDI) at 24 Months
-0.02
0.07**
0.07**
Family Environment Scale: Family Conflict at 24 Months
-0.06
-0.07
-0.04
Support of Cognitive, Language, and Literary Environment (HOME) at 24 Months
-0.15
0.19*
0.40***
Parenting Stress Index at 24 Months
0.51
-1.07
-2.12***
Percentage of Children with Poor or Fair Health at 24 Months
-0.24*
0.02
0.01
Percentage of Caregivers Ever in an Education or Training Program During the 15 Months After Random Assignment
0.92
5.90**
5.43
Average Hours Per Week Caregivers Were in Education or Training During the 15 Months After Random Assignment
1.16
1.27***
1.08*
Sample Size
612
1,385
1,004


SOURCE: PSI and PI data and Bayley and video assessments.

NOTE: A negative sign for impacts for the CBCL, video negativity, parental detachment, family conflict, and the parenting stress index should be interpreted as positive (beneficial) program effects. A positive sign for the impact for other outcomes should be interpreted as positive (beneficial) effects.

*Significantly different than zero at the .10 level, two-tailed test.
**Significantly different than zero at the .05 level, two-tailed test.
***Significantly different than zero at the .01 level, two-tailed test.

 

TABLE D.4B
PERCENTAGE OF PROGRAMS WITH ESTIMATED IMPACTS WITH A POSITIVE SIGN, BY PROGRAM APPROACH USING THE 1997 DEFINITION
Variable
Center-Based
(4 Sites)
Home-Based
(7 Sites)
Mixed
(6 Sites)
Bayley Mental Development Index (MDI) at 24 Months of Age
100.00
85.71
50.00
Percent with Bayley MDI Below 85 at 24 Months
0.00
71.43
33.33
Vocabulary Production at 24 Months
50.00
57.14
50.00
Sentence Complexity Score at 24 Months
50.00
57.14
100.00
Aggressive Behavior Problems At 24 Months (CBCL)
0.00
57.14
16.67
Engagement of Parent at 24 Months (Three Bag)
75.00
42.86
83.33
Negativity Towards Parent at 24 Months (Three Bag)
50.00
42.86
16.67
Sustained Attention with Objects at 24 Months (Three Bag)
50.00
71.43
83.33
Parental Supportiveness at 24 Months (Three Bag)
50.00
100.00
83.33
Parental Detachment at 24 Months (Three Bag)
75.00
0.00
16.67
Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory (KIDI) at 24 Months
75.00
85.71
66.67
Family Environment Scale:Family Conflict at 24 Months
50.00
28.57
33.33
Support of Cognitive, Language, and Literary Environment (HOME) at 24 Months
50.00
85.71
83.33
Parenting Stress Index at 24Months
50.00
28.57
50.00
Percentage of Children with Poor or Fair Health at 24 Months
25.00
42.86
33.33
Percentage of Caregivers Ever in an Education or Training Program During the 15 Months After Random Assignment
25.00
85.71
83.33
Average Hours Per Week Caregivers Were in Education or Training During the 15 Months After Random Assignment
50.00
85.71
100.00
Sample Size
612
1,385
1,004


SOURCE: PSI and PI data and Bayley and video assessments.

NOTE: Small proportions represent beneficial findings for the CBCL, video negativity, parental detachment, family conflict, and the parenting stress index. Large proportions represent beneficial findings for the other outcomes.

*Significantly different than zero at the .10 level, two-tailed test
**Significantly different than zero at the .05 level, two-tailed test
***Significantly different than zero at the .01 level, two-tailed test

 

TABLE D.4C
IMPACT ESTIMATES PER PARTICIPANT FOR KEY OUTCOMES, BY PROGRAM
APPROACH USING THE SERVICE CONFIGURATION DEFINITION
Variable
Center-Based
(4 Sites)
Home-Based
(10 Sites)
Mixed
(3 Sites)
Bayley Mental Development Index (MDI) at 24 Months of Age
2.94*
1.33
2.22
Percent with Bayley MDI Below 85 at 24 Months
11.81*
-3.59
-6.79
Vocabulary Production at 24 Months
-1.38
3.36**
4.32
Sentence Complexity Score at 24 Months
-0.45
1.22**
2.22**
Aggressive Behavior Problems At 24 Months (CBCL)
-1.84
-1.24*
-1.50
Engagement of Parent at 24 Months (Three Bag)
-0.09
0.10
0.21
Negativity Towards Parent at 24 Months (Three Bag)
-0.01
-0.06
-0.15
Sustained Attention with Objects at 24 Months (Three Bag)
-0.13
0.11*
0.10
Parental Supportiveness at 24 Months (Three Bag)
-0.05
0.21***
0.16
Parental Detachment at 24 Months (Three Bag)
0.08
-0.16***
-0.16
Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory (KIDI) at 24 Months
-0.02
0.07***
0.08
Family Environment Scale: Family Conflict at 24 Months
-0.06
-0.10***
0.08
Support of Cognitive, Language, and Literary Environment (HOME) at 24 Months
-0.15
0.18**
0.78***
Parenting Stress Index at 24 Months
0.51
-2.12***
0.55
Percentage of Children with Poor or Fair Health at 24 Months
-0.24*
0.06
-0.07
Percentage of Caregivers Ever in an Education or Training Program During the 15 Months After Random Assignment
0.92
5.46**
6.79
Average Hours Per Week Caregivers Were in Education or Training During the 15 Months After Random Assignment
1.16
1.23***
0.90
Sample Size
612
1,875
514


SOURCE: PSI and PI data and Bayley and video assessments.

NOTE: A negative sign for impacts for the CBCL, video negativity, parental detachment, family conflict, and the parenting stress index should be interpreted as positive (beneficial) program effects. A positive sign for the impact for other outcomes should be interpreted as positive (beneficial) effects.

*Significantly different than zero at the .10 level, two-tailed test
**Significantly different than zero at the .05 level, two-tailed test
***Significantly different than zero at the .01 level, two-tailed test

 

TABLE D.4D
PERCENTAGE OF PROGRAMS WITH ESTIMATED IMPACTS WITH A POSITIVE SIGN, BY PROGRAM APPROACH USING THE SERVICE CONFIGURATION DEFINITION
Variable
Center-Based
(4 Sites)
Home-Based(
10 Sites)
Mixed
(3 Sites)
Bayley Mental Development Index (MDI) at 24 Months of Age
100.00
80.00
33.33
Percent with Bayley MDI Below 85 at 24 Months
0.00
50.00
66.67
Vocabulary Production at 24Months
50.00
60.00
33.33
Sentence Complexity Score at 24 Months
50.00
70.00
100.00
Aggressive Behavior Problems At 24 Months (CBCL)
0.00
40.00
33.33
Engagement of Parent at 24 Months (Three Bag)
75.00
60.00
66.67
Negativity Towards Parent at 24 Months (Three Bag)
50.00
30.00
33.33
Sustained Attention with Objects at 24 Months (Three Bag)
50.00
80.00
66.67
Parental Supportiveness at 24Months (Three Bag)
50.00
100.00
66.67
Parental Detachment at 24 Months (Three Bag)
75.00
0.00
33.33
Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory (KIDI) at 24 Months
75.00
80.00
66.67
Family Environment Scale: Family Conflict at 24 Months
50.00
20.00
66.67
Support of Cognitive, Language,and Literary Environment (HOME) at 24 Months
50.00
90.00
66.67
Parenting Stress Index at 24 Months
50.00
20.00
100.00
Percentage of Children with Poor or Fair Health at 24 Months
25.00
50.00
0.00
Percentage of Caregivers Ever in an Education or Training Program During the 15 Months After Random Assignment
25.00
80.00
100.00
Average Hours Per Week Caregivers Were in Education or Training During the 15 Months After Random Assignment
50.00
90.00
100.00
Sample Size
612
1,875
514


SOURCE: PSI and PI data and Bayley and video assessments.

NOTE: Small proportions represent beneficial findings for the CBCL, video negativity, parental detachment, family conflict, and the parenting stress index. Large proportions represent beneficial findings for the other outcomes.

*Significantly different than zero at the .10 level, two-tailed test
**Significantly different than zero at the .05 level, two-tailed test
***Significantly different than zero at the .01 level, two-tailed test

 

TABLE D.4E
IMPACT ESTIMATES PER PARTICIPANT FOR KEY OUTCOMES FOR EARLY-IMPLEMENTED AND NOT EARLY-IMPLEMENTED MIXED PROGRAMS USING THE 1997 DEFINITION
Variable
Early-Implemented Mixed Programs
(3 Sites)
Not Early-Implemented Mixed Programs
(3 Sites)
Bayley Mental Development Index (MDI) at 24 Months of Age 2.35 0.27
Percent with Bayley MDI Below 85 at 24 Months -8.73 -5.57
Vocabulary Production at 24 Months 6.30** -1.07
Sentence Complexity Score at 24 Months 2.24* 1.45
Aggressive Behavior ProblemsAt 24 Months (CBCL) -2.59 -1.21
Engagement of Parent at 24 Months (Three Bag) 0.20 0.15
Negativity Towards Parent at 24 Months (Three Bag) -0.16 -0.09
Sustained Attention with Objects at 24 Months (Three Bag) 0.26 -0.06
Parental Supportiveness at 24 Months (Three Bag) 0.30* 0.11
Parental Detachment at 24 Months (Three Bag) -0.21 -0.21
Knowledge of InfantDevelopment Inventory (KIDI) at 24 Months 0.05 0.07
Family Environment Scale:Family Conflict at 24 Months 0.01 -0.01
Support of Cognitive, Language, and Literary Environment (HOME) at 24 Months 0.63*** 0.26
Parenting Stress Index at 24 Months -1.64 -0.79
Percentage of Children with Poor or Fair Health at 24 Months -0.27* 0.09
Percentage of Caregivers Ever in an Education or Training Program During the 15 Months After Random Assignment 4.54 5.55
Average Hours Per Week Caregivers Were in Education or Training During the 15 Months After Random Assignment 0.53 1.88*
Sample Size 540 464


SOURCE: PSI and PI data and Bayley and video assessments.

NOTE: A negative sign for impacts for the CBCL, video negativity, parental detachment, family conflict, and the parenting stress index should be interpreted as positive (beneficial) program effects. A positive sign for the impact for other outcomes should be interpreted as positive (beneficial) effects.

*Significantly different than zero at the .10 level, two-tailed test
**Significantly different than zero at the .05 level, two-tailed test
***Significantly different than zero at the .01 level, two-tailed test

 

TABLE D.4F
PERCENTAGE OF PROGRAMS WITH ESTIMATED IMPACTS WITH A POSITIVE SIGN FOR EARLY-IMPLEMENTED AND NOT EARLY-IMPLEMENTED MIXED PROGRAMS USING THE 1997 DEFINITION
Variable
Early-Implemented Mixed Programs
(3 Sites)
Not Early-ImplementedPrograms
(3 Sites)
Bayley Mental Development Index (MDI) at 24 Months of Age 66.67 33.33
Percent with Bayley MDI Below 85 at 24 Months 0.00 66.67
Vocabulary Production at 24Months 100.00 0.00
Sentence Complexity Score at 24 Months 100.00 100.00
Aggressive Behavior ProblemsAt 24 Months (CBCL) 0.00 33.33
Engagement of Parent at 24Months (Three Bag) 100.00 66.67
Negativity Towards Parent at 24Months (Three Bag) 33.33 0.00
Sustained Attention with Objects at 24 Months (Three Bag) 100.00 66.67
Parental Supportiveness at 24Months (Three Bag) 100.00 66.67
Parental Detachment at 24Months (Three Bag) 0.00 33.33
Knowledge of InfantDevelopment Inventory (KIDI) at 24 Months 66.67 66.67
Family Environment Scale:Family Conflict at 24 Months 0.00 66.67
Support of Cognitive, Language,and Literary Environment(HOME) at 24 Months 100.00 66.67
Parenting Stress Index at 24Months 33.33 66.67
Percentage of Children with Poor or Fair Health at 24 Months 33.33 33.33
Percentage of Caregivers Ever in an Education or Training Program During the 15 Months After Random Assignment 66.67 100.00
Average Hours Per WeekCaregivers Were in Education or Training During the 15 Months After Random Assignment 100.00 100.00


SOURCE: PSI and PI data and Bayley and video assessments.

NOTE: Small proportions represent beneficial findings for the CBCL, video negativity, parental detachment, family conflict, and the parenting stress index. Large proportions represent beneficial findings for the other outcomes.

*Significantly different than zero at the .10 level, two-tailed test
**Significantly different than zero at the .05 level, two-tailed test
***Significantly different than zero at the .01 level, two-tailed test

 

TABLE D.4G
IMPACT ESTIMATES PER PARTICIPANT FOR KEY OUTCOMES FOR EARLY-,
LATE-, AND NEVER-IMPLEMENTED HOME-BASED PROGRAMS USING THE SERVICE CONFIGURATION DEFINITION
Variable
Early-Implemented Home-Based Programs
(3 Sites)
Late-Implemented Home-Based Programs
(4 Sites)
Never-Implemented Home-Based Programs
(3 Sites)
Bayley Mental Development Index (MDI) at 24 Months of Age
1.26
1.52
0.62
Percent with Bayley MDI Below 85 at 24 Months
-4.86
-1.71
0.06
Vocabulary Production at 24 Months
4.68**
2.12
4.23*
Sentence Complexity Score at 24 Months
2.27**
0.80
0.80
Aggressive Behavior Problems At 24 Months (CBCL)
-2.91***
0.08
-1.07
Engagement of Parent at 24 Months (Three Bag)
0.24*
0.17
-0.10
Negativity Towards Parent at 24 Months (Three Bag)
-0.21**
-0.04
0.11
Sustained Attention with Objects at 24 Months (Three Bag)
0.30***
0.05
0.01
Parental Supportiveness at 24 Months (Three Bag)
0.33***
0.18*
0.12
Parental Detachment at 24Months (Three Bag)
-0.12*
-0.21**
-0.11
Knowledge of InfantDevelopment Inventory (KIDI) at 24 Months
0.01
0.15***
0.03
Family Environment Scale:Family Conflict at 24 Months
-0.11*
-0.05
-0.15**
Support of Cognitive, Language, and Literary Environment (HOME) at 24 Months
0.07
0.27*
0.32**
Parenting Stress Index at 24 Months
-2.75***
-2.49***
-0.67
Percentage of Children with Poor or Fair Health at 24 Months
0.05
0.07
0.04
Percentage of Caregivers Ever in an Education or Training Program During the 15 Months After Random Assignment
7.12
3.86
9.84**
Average Hours Per Week Caregivers Were in Education or Training During the 15 Months After Random Assignment
-0.02
1.79***
2.33**
Sample Size
530
727
18


SOURCE: PSI and PI data and Bayley and video assessments.

NOTE: A negative sign for impacts for the CBCL, video negativity, parental detachment, family conflict, and the parenting stress index should be interpreted as positive (beneficial) program effects. A positive sign for the impact for other outcomes should be interpreted as positive (beneficial) effects.

*Significantly different than zero at the .10 level, two-tailed test
**Significantly different than zero at the .05 level, two-tailed test
***Significantly different than zero at the .01 level, two-tailed test

 

TABLE D.4H
PERCENTAGE OF PROGRAMS WITH ESTIMATED IMPACTS WITH A POSITIVE SIGN FOR EARLY-, LATE-, AND NEVER-IMPLEMENTED HOME-BASED PROGRAMS USING THE SERVICE CONFIGURATION DEFINITION
Variable
Early-ImplementedHome-Based Programs
(3 Sites)
Late-Implemented Home-Based Programs
(4 Sites)
Never-Implemented Home-Based Programs
(3 Sites)
Bayley Mental Development Index (MDI) at 24 Months of Age
66.67
75.00
100.00
Percent with Bayley MDI Below 85 at 24 Months
33.33
50.00
66.67
Vocabulary Production at 24 Months
66.67
50.00
66.67
Sentence Complexity Score at 24 Months
66.67
75.00
66.67
Aggressive Behavior ProblemsAt 24 Months (CBCL)
33.33
50.00
33.33
Engagement of Parent at 24 Months (Three Bag)
66.67
75.00
33.33
Negativity Towards Parent at 24 Months (Three Bag)
0.00
25.00
66.67
Sustained Attention with Objects at 24 Months (Three Bag)
100.00
75.00
66.67
Parental Supportiveness at 24 Months (Three Bag)
100.00
100.00
100.00
Parental Detachment at 24 Months (Three Bag)
0.00
0.00
0.00
Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory (KIDI) at 24 Months
66.67
100.00
66.67
Family Environment Scale: Family Conflict at 24 Months
0.00
50.00
0.00
Support of Cognitive, Language,and Literary Environment(HOME) at 24 Months
66.67
100.00
100.00
Parenting Stress Index at 24 Months
33.33
25.00
0.00
Percentage of Children with Poor or Fair Health at 24 Months
33.33
75.00
33.33
Percentage of Caregivers Ever in an Education or Training Program During the 15 Months After Random Assignment
66.67
75.00
100.00
Average Hours Per Week Caregivers Were in Education or Training During the 15 Months After Random Assignment
66.67
100.00
100.00
Sample Size
530
727
618


SOURCE: PSI and PI data and Bayley and video assessments.

NOTE: Small proportions represent beneficial findings for the CBCL, video negativity, parental detachment, family conflict, and the parenting stress index. Large proportions represent beneficial findings for the other outcomes.

*Significantly different than zero at the .10 level, two-tailed test
**Significantly different than zero at the .05 level, two-tailed test
***Significantly different than zero at the .01 level, two-tailed test




6There is some overlap in these two analyses, because 3 of the 1997 mixed programs (2 of which were early implementers) were recategorized as mostly home-based programs based on the later definition.(back)
7Impacts with a positive sign are beneficial impacts for outcomes for which larger values are preferable to smaller values (for example, Bayley or MacArthur scores). However, impacts with a negative sign are beneficial impacts for outcomes for which smaller values are preferable to larger values (for example, the CBCL aggressiveness scale or the percentage with Bayley scores less than 85).(back)
8This conclusion does not consider possible measurement bias that might result if parents in center-based programs are less able than those in home-based programs to accurately report their children's language abilities.(back)

 

 Table of Contents | Previous | Next