Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      

Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE) skip to primary page content
Advanced
Search

 Table of Contents | Previous | Next

APPENDIX E.VII

TABLE E.VII.9
IMPACTS ON CHILD AND FAMILY OUTCOMES AT AGE 2, BY AGE OF MOTHER AT CHILD'S BIRTH
  Teenage Mother   Older Mother
Outcome Program
Group
Control
Groupa
Impact Estimate
per Participantb
Effect Sizec   Program
Group
Control
Groupa
Impact Estimate
per Participantb
Effect Sizec
CHILD COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT
Average Bayley Mental Development Index (MDI) 90.1 88.3 1.9 13.7   90.6 88.4 2.2** 16.3
Percentage with MDI < 85***d 33.3 38.8 -5.5 -11.3   33.2 38.2 -4.9 -10.1
Percentage with MDI < 100*** 76.2 80.2 -4.1 -9.9   72.4 80.0 -7.7*** -18.6
CHILD LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT
Average MacArthur CDI-Vocabulary Production 58.2 55.1 3.2* 14.0   55.5 52.9 2.6* 11.4
Percentage with Vocabulary Production < 25*** 5.7 8.9 -3.2 -10.1   11.7 11.9 -0.3 -0.8
Average MacArthur CDI-Combining Words*** 85.2 86.8 -1.6 -3.8   79.6 72.6 7.0*** 16.7
Average MacArthur CDI-Sentence Complexity 9.5 8.6 0.9 10.6   8.4 7.3 1.2** 14.2
Percentage with Sentence Complexity < 2*** 25.6 20.7 4.9 10.7   28.3 33.9 -5.6* -12.3
CHILD SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Average Bayley BRS-Emotional Regulation 3.7 3.6 0.1 10.0   3.6 3.6 -0.0 -2.5
Average Bayley BRS-Orientation/Engagement 3.7 3.7 -0.0 -3.5   3.6 3.7 -0.0 -4.0
Child Behavior Checklist-Aggression* 9.9 11.2 -1.3** -23.3   9.9 10.1 -0.2 -2.7
Parent-Child Structured Play: Child Sustained Attention with Objects (Average) 5.1 5.0 0.1 14.1   5.1 4.9 0.1* 13.3
Parent-Child Structured Play: Child Negativity Toward Parent (Average) 1.8 1.9 -0.1 -5.6   1.6 1.7 -0.1 -8.8
Parent-Child Structured Play: Child Engagement (Average) 4.3 4.1 0.2* 16.5   4.4 4.3 0.1 5.0
QUALITY OF THE HOME ENVIRONMENT AND PARENTING: EMOTIONAL SUPPORT
Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) Emotional Responsivity 5.9 5.8 0.1 5.2   6.3 6.1 0.2** 10.9
Parent-Child Structured Play: Parent Supportiveness 3.9 3.7 0.2** 20.4   4.2 4.0 0.1* 12.2
QUALITY OF THE HOME ENVIRONMENT AND PARENTING: STIMULATION OF LANGUAGE AND LEARNING
HOME Cognitive, Language, and Literacy Support 10.4 10.3 0.1 5.4   10.3 10.0 0.3*** 14.9
Regular Bedtimes*** 57.9 54.5 3.4 7.0   62.2 56.1 6.2* 12.5
Bedtime Routines*** 64.7 66.0 -1.4 -3.0   71.8 67.4 4.4 9.4
Reading Daily*** 60.4 56.1 4.3 8.6   55.2 50.2 5.0 10.0
Reading at Bedtime*** 28.5 21.4 7.1* 16.9   31.2 23.1 8.1*** 19.2
Father Reads to Child* 3.2 3.4 -0.2 -10.4   3.6 3.4 0.2 10.1
Reading Frequency 4.7 4.6 0.1 10.3   4.5 4.4 0.1* 10.2
Parent-Child Activities to Stimulate Cognitive and Language Development 4.6 4.6 0.1 8.4   4.5 4.4 0.0 4.9
Outside Activities 2.8 2.8 0.0 0.4   2.8 2.7 0.0 6.0
HOME Verbal/Social Skills*** 2.6 2.7 -0.1** -19.3   2.9 2.8 0.2*** 22.3
QUALITY OF THE HOME ENVIRONMENT AND PARENTING: NEGATIVE PARENTING BEHAVIOR
HOME Absence of Punitive Interactions* 4.3 4.2 0.1 12.1   4.4 4.5 -0.1 -8.9
Parent-Child Structured Play: Parent Detachment 1.5 1.7 -0.2* -17.4   1.4 1.4 -0.1 -5.8
Parent-Child Structured Play: Parent Intrusiveness 2.0 2.0 -0.1 -4.8   1.8 1.8 -0.1 -5.5
High Chair and Parent-Child Structured Play: Negative Regard 1.6 1.6 -0.0 -0.5   1.4 1.4 0.0 1.2
Spanked Child in Last Week*** 53.4 60.4 -7.0 -14.1   46.8 49.5 -2.7 -5.4
KNOWLEDGE OF CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND DISCIPLINE STRATEGIES
Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory (KIDI) 3.4 3.3 0.1* 14.1   3.4 3.4 0.04* 10.2
Would Use Mild Discipline Only*** 34.3 31.7 2.6 5.3   47.5 42.4 5.1 10.3
Index of Discipline Severity 2.9 3.1 -0.2 -9.9   2.5 2.6 -0.1 -8.5
Safety Precaution Index 4.2 4.3 -0.1 -5.6   4.5 4.4 0.1 8.6
Has Syrup of Ipecac at Home*** 25.1 27.3 -2.2 -4.7   35.3 32.8 2.6 5.6
Has Poison Control Number*** 37.7 34.4 3.3 6.8   40.7 38.4 2.3 4.7
Has Gates or Doors in Front of Stairs*** 77.5 81.6 -4.1 -10.4   77.7 79.0 -1.3 -3.4
Uses a Car Seat*** 76.7 81.4 -4.7 -12.3   83.3 83.1 0.2 0.5
Covers Electric Outlets*** 54.2 56.1 -1.9 -3.8   63.8 61.6 2.2 4.5
PARENT PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH
PSI Parental Distress* 24.8 26.9 -2.1** -22.1   24.9 25.2 -0.3 -3.1
PSI Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction* 16.8 17.9 -1.1** -18.7   17.1 17.1 -0.0 -0.1
FES Family Conflict 1.7 1.8 -0.1 -15.9   1.7 1.7 -0.0 -3.5
CIDI Depression (Probability) 12.7 11.4 1.3 4.5   12.8 12.9 -0.1 -0.5
Overall Health Status 3.6 3.5 0.1 6.8   3.4 3.4 0.0 2.4
Sample Size                  
Parent interview 393 388 781     665 607 1,272  
Bayley 323 323 646     556 485 1,041  
Parent-child interactions 326 325 651     558 475 1,033  


SOURCE: Parent interviews, child assessments, interviewer observations, and assessments of semi-structured parent-child interactions conducted when children were approximately 24 months old.

NOTE: All estimates were calculated using regression models, where each site was weighted equally. Only sites with at least 10 program group members and 10 control group members in the subgroup are included in the estimates for each subgroup.

aThe control group mean is the mean for the control group members who would have participated in Early Head Start if they had instead been assigned to the program group. This unobserved mean is estimated as the difference between the program group mean for participants and the impact per participant. A participant is defined as a program group member who received more than one Early Head Start home visit, met with an Early Head Start case manager more than once, received at least two weeks of Early Head Start center-based services, and/or participated in Early Head Start parent-child group activities.(back)

bThe estimated impact per participant is measured as the estimated impact per eligible applicant divided by the proportion of program group members who participated in Early Head Start services (which varied by site). The estimated impact per eligible applicant is measured as the difference between the regression-adjusted means for program and control group members.(back)

cThe effect size is calculated by dividing the estimated impact per participant by the standard deviation of the outcome measure for the control group times 100 (that is, it is the impact per participant expressed as a percentage of a standard deviation).(back)

dAsterisks next to variable names indicate significance levels for statistical tests of differences in impacts across the subgroups.(back)

*Significantly different from zero at the .10 level, two-tailed test.
**Significantly different from zero at the .05 level, two-tailed test.
***Significantly different from zero at the .01 level, two-tailed test.



 

 

 Table of Contents | Previous | Next