Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      

Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE) skip to primary page content
Advanced
Search

Table of Contents | Previous | Next

D.2 ASSESSING AND CORRECTING FOR THE EFFECTS OF NONRESPONSE TO THE EARLY HEAD START INTERVIEWS AND ASSESSMENTS

In the previous section, we examined the baseline characteristics of program and control group members in the full analysis sample and concluded that they were similar. However, as discussed in Chapter II, not all sample members completed the follow-up interviews and assessments. The response rate was about 70 percent to the 26-month parent services interview (PSI), 70 percent to the 36-month birthday-related parent interview (PI), and 55 percent to the Bayley and video assessments. Furthermore, response rates differed somewhat across sites and subgroups defined by site and family characteristics at baseline. Thus, it was important to test whether program group members who responded to the interviews are fully representative of all program group members, and whether control group members who responded to the interviews are fully representative of all control group members. Furthermore, it was important to test whether the baseline characteristics of respondents in the two research groups differ from each other. If not corrected, the effects of interview nonresponse could lead to two problems:

  1. The impact estimates could be biased. This would occur if the differences in the average baseline characteristics of respondents in the program and control groups were correlated with the outcome variables, and hence, the impact estimates.

  2. The impact estimates might not be generalizable to the study population of eligible families. This would occur if the differences between interview respondents and nonrespondents were correlated with the outcome variables (regardless of whether or not the average characteristics of program group and control group respondents were similar).

In this appendix, we assess the effects of nonresponse and discuss procedures that we used to adjust for potential nonresponse effects.

1. Assessing the Effects of Nonresponse

Our basic approach for assessing the effects of nonresponse to key data sources was to compare the baseline characteristics of (1) respondents in the program and control groups, and (2) respondents to the full sample of respondents and nonrespondents in each research group. We conducted this analysis using data from the HSFIS application and enrollment forms, and with the same methods that we used to compare the baseline characteristics of the full program and control groups (see Appendix D.1). To keep the presentation manageable, we focus our analysis on the 26-month PSI and the 36-month birthday-related interviews and assessments.1  Tables D.2A to D.2D display the following results from the nonresponse analysis, with separate tables displayed for each data source:

  1. Variable distributions for interview respondents, by research status

  2. Significance levels for tests of differences between the characteristics of respondents in the program and control groups

  3. Variable distributions for the full sample of respondents and nonrespondents, by research status

  4. Significance levels for tests of differences between respondents and the full sample of respondents and nonrespondents, by research status

We find some differences in the characteristics of respondents and the full sample of respondents and nonrespondents for each research group and data source. Response rates for the program group were higher in center-based programs than in home-based or mixed-approach programs, and response rates for both research groups were higher in “fully implemented” programs than in programs that were not fully implemented. Response rates increased with the education level of the primary caregiver.

 

TABLE D.2A

COMPARISON OF THE BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS OF RESPONDENTS AND THE FULL SAMPLE OF RESPONDENTS AND NONRESPONDENTS TO THE 26-MONTH PSI, BY RESEARCH STATUS
Variable Respondents Respondents and
Nonrespondents
Program
Group
Control
Groupa

Program
Groupb

Control
Groupc
Site Characteristics
Program Approach        
Center-based 21.4 20.2 20.2 20.6 *
Home-based 45.4 44.8 46.7 45.6
Mixed 33.3 35 33 33.9
Overall Implementation Pattern        
Early implementers 34 36.3 34.5 * 34.8 *
Later implementers 38.1 37 35 35.1
Incomplete implementers 27.9 26.7 30.5 30
Family and Parent Characteristics
Age of Mother at Birth of Focus Child        
Younger than 20 38.7 38.9 39 39.5
20 to 25 32.6 33.4 33.2 32
25 or older 28.6 27.8 27.9 28.5
Mother Was Younger than 19 at First Birth 42.1 40.4 42.9 41.2
Highest Grade Completed        
Less than 12 45.8 46.2 47.7 * 47.8 *
12 or earned a GED 28.2 29.2 27.3 29.8
More than 12 26 24.6 24.9 22.4
Race and Ethnicity        
White non-Hispanic 37.2 38.2 37.3 * 37.1
Black non-Hispanic 35.3 34.1 34.2 35
Hispanic 23.7 22.8 23.8 23.4
Other (Asian or Pacific Islander, American Indian, Eskimo, Aleut) 3.9 4.9 3.9 4.9
Primary Occupation        
Employed 24.3 23.2 37.2 23.8
In school or a training program 22.2 21 35.3 21.4
Other 53.5 55.8 23.7 54.7
English Language Ability        
Primary language is English 79.7 78.6 79.9 78.1
Primary language is not English but the applicant
speaks English well
9.1 10.5 9.6 10.3
Primary language is not English and the applicant
does not speak English well
11.2 10.9 10.5 11.6
Living Arrangements        
Living with a spouse 25.7 26.9 24.9 25.4 *
Living with other adults 38.5 40.4 38.3 39.1
Living with no other adults 35.9 32.7 36.8 5.5
Adult Male Present in the Household 39.6 40.8 38.1 * 39.1 *
Number of Adults in the Householdd        
1 36.8 33.5 37.8 36.6 *
2 50.1 53 49.8 50.8
3 or more 13 13.4 12.4 12.6
Number of Children Less than 5 Years Old in the Household Other than the Focus Child        
0 64.8 63.3 64.3 65.1 *
1 26.3 27.9 27 26.8
2 or more 8.9 8.9 8.7 8.1
Number of Children Between 6 and 17 in the Household        
0 64.1 66.1 64.3 66.4
1 23 21.1 23.1 21.3
2 or more 12.8 12.8 12.6 12.3
Number of Moves in the Past Year        
0 51.1 51.2 49.5 * 49.8
1 28.8 27.1 28.9 28.1
2 or more 20.1 21.7 21.6 22.1
Owns Home 12 12 11.0 * 11.1
Household Income as a Percent of Poverty Level (Percent)        
Less than 33 29.5 28.2 30.2 30.0 *
33 to 67 31.7 31.7 32.5 29.2
67 to 99 24.2 26.7 24 26.5
100 or more 14.6 13.5 13.3 14.3
Welfare Receipt        
AFDC/TANFe 33.1 33.2 35.6 * 34.7
Food Stamps 45.7 46.8 48.0 * 47.8
Medicaid 75.4 75 76.6 * 74.7
SSI 6.4 7.1 7 7
WIC 87.1 86.6 87.5 85.9
Public housing 9.6 9 9.5 8.9
Has Inadequate Resources        
Food 4.3 7.4 * 4.9 * 6.3 *
Housing 11.8 12.5 12.3 13.3
Money to buy necessities 20.3 21.5 20.8 21.7
Medical care 12.7 14.5 14.0 * 14.7
Transportation 21.1 23 20.9 22.4
Child care 34.2 34.8 34.4 34.6
Money for supplies 25.5 30.9 * 27.1 * 29.4
Support from friends 12.1 12.8 12.9 14.0 *
Parent information 12.4 15.2 * 12.5 16.3
Maternal Risk Indexf        
0 or 1 (low risk) 21 17.8 19.0 * 17.4
2 or 3 (moderate risk) 53.5 56.9 54.2 56.5
4 or 5 (high risk) 25.5 25.2 26.8 26
Random Assignment Date        
Before 10/96 35.7 35.4 36 36.5
10/96 to 6/97 30.3 32.3 30.2 30.8
After 6/97 34 32.2 33.8 32.7
Previously Enrolled in Head Start or        
Another Childhood Development Programe 12.3 14.1 12.8 13.4
Characteristics of Focus Child
Age (Months)        
Unborn 25 27.5 24.2 26.5
Less than 5 34.8 34.2 36.1 34.7
5 or more 40.2 38.3 39.7 38.7
Male 50.7 50.2 51.7 50.4
First Born 62.6 60.6 62.3 62.8 *
Birthweight Less than 2,500 Gramse 8.9 7.8 9.9 8.4
Born more than 3 Weeks Earlye 14.8 11.5 * 15.8 12
Stayed in Hospital After Birthe 17 15.8 18.3 * 16
People Concerned About the Child's Overall Health and Developmente 12.3 14.6 13 13.3 *
Received an Evaluation Because of Concerns About the Child's Overall Health and Development or Because of Suspected Developmental Delaye 5.3 6.4 6 6.9
Risk Categories        
Has established risks(e) 11 10.5 11.6 10.6
Has biological or medical riskse 17.6 16.5 18.3 16.8
Has environmental riskse 31.8 38.1 * 32.5 36.4 *
Covered by Health Insurancee 91.3 91.4 90.1 * 89.6 *
Sample Size 1,076 1,011 1,513 1,488
SOURCE: HSFIS application and enrollment forms and 26-month PSI data.

aSignificance levels are from tests comparing program and control group respondents.(back)

bSignificance levels are from tests comparing respondents and the full sample of respondents and nonrespondents in the program group.(back)

cSignificance levels are from tests comparing respondents and the full sample of respondents and nonrespondents in the control group.(back)

dThe primary caregiver is considered to be an adult regardless of her age.(back)

eThese variables pertain to families with focus children who were born at baseline.(back)

fThis index was constructed by summing the number of the following risk factors that the mother faced: (1) being a teenage mother; (2) having no high school credential; (3) receiving public assistance; (4) not being employed or in school or training, and (5) being a single mother.(back)

*Significantly different from zero at the .10 level, two-tailed test.

TABLE D.2B

COMPARISON OF THE BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS OF RESPONDENTS AND THE FULL SAMPLE OF RESPONDENTS AND NONRESPONDENTS TO THE 36-MONTH PI, BY RESEARCH STATUS
Variable Respondents Respondents and
Nonrespondents
Program
Group
Control
Groupa
Program
Groupb
Control
Groupc
Site Characteristics
Program Approach        
Center-based 22.9 21 20.2 * 20.6
Home-based 45.3 44.7 46.7 45.6
Mixed 31.7 34.3 33 33.9
Overall Implementation Pattern        
Early implementers 35 35.7 34.5 * 34.8 *
Later implementers 37.8 36.1 35 35.1
Incomplete implementers 27.2 28.2 30.5 30
Family and Parent Characteristics
Age of Mother at Birth of Focus Child        
Younger than 20 37.9 38.7 39.0 * 39.5
20 to 25 33 32.6 33.2 32
25 or older 29.1 28.7 27.9 28.5
Mother Was Younger than 19 at First Birth 42.3 40.6 42.9 * 41.2
Highest Grade Completed        
Less than 12 45.3 45.5 47.7 * 47.8 *
12 or earned a GED 29.2 29.1 27.3 29.8
More than 12 25.5 25.4 24.9 22.4
Race and Ethnicity        
White non-Hispanic 39.6 39.9 37.3 * 37.1 *
Black non-Hispanic 32.5 33.9 34.2 35
Hispanic 23.8 21.6 23.8 23.4
Other (Asian or Pacific Islander, American Indian, Eskimo, Aleut) 4.1 4.6 4.7 4.5
Primary Occupation        
Employed 25.2 23.8 22.9 * 23.8
In school or a training program 21.8 20.8 22 21.4
Other 52.9 55.4 55 54.7
English Language Ability        
Primary language is English 80.2 80.1 79.9 78.1 *
Primary language is not English but the applicant speaks English well 8.9 10.2 9.6 10.3
Primary language is not English and the applicant does not speak English well 10.9 9.7 10.5 11.6
Living Arrangements        
Living with a spouse 26 27 24.9 25.4
Living with other adults 38.4 38.9 38.3 39.1
Living with no other adults 35.6 34.2 36.8 35.5
Adult Male Present in the Household 39.8 40.8 38.1 * 39.1 *
Number of Adults in the Householdd        
1 36.8 35.1 37.8 36.6
2 50.3 51.5 49.8 50.8
3 or more 12.9 13.4 12.4 12.6
Number of Children Less than 5 Years Old in the Household Other than the Focus Child        
0 64.7 63.3 64.3 65.1
1 26.8 28.4 27 26.8
2 or more 8.5 8.3 8.7 8.1
Number of Children Between 6 and 17 in the Household        
0 63.1 65.6 64.3 66.4
1 24.4 21.3 23.1 21.3
2 or more 12.6 13 12.6 12.3
Number of Moves in the Past Year        
0 50.8 51.3 49.5 49.8
1 28.1 27.8 28.9 28.1
2 or more 21.1 20.8 21.6 22.1
Owns Home 12.2 12.3 11.0 * 11.1 *
Household Income as a Percent of the Poverty Level (Percent)        
Less than 33 29.2 28 30.2 * 30
33 to 67 31.3 30.4 32.5 29.2
67 to 99 25.1 27.4 24 26.5
100 or more 14.3 14.1 13.3 14.3
Welfare Receipt        
AFDC/TANFe 32.7 33.4 35.6 * 34.7
Food Stamps 45.9 46.4 48.0 * 47.8
Medicaid 75.8 74.7 76.6 74.7
SSI 6.8 7.2 7 7
WIC 87.5 86 87.5 85.9
Public housing 10 8.6 9.5 8.9
Has Inadequate Resources        
Food 4.6 6.9 * 4.9 6.3
Housing 11.9 12.1 12.3 13.3 *
Money to buy necessities 19.7 20.4 20.8 * 21.7 *
Medical care 13.4 14 14 14.7
Transportation 20.7 22.1 20.9 22.4
Child care 33.3 34.2 34.4 34.6
Money for supplies 25.1 30.2 * 27.1 * 29.4
Support from friends 12.2 11.8 12.9 14.0 *
Parent information 12.9 15.4 * 12.5 16.3
Maternal Risk Indexf        
0 or 1 (low risk) 21.2 19.2 19.0 * 17.4 *
2 or 3 (moderate risk) 54.3 55.9 54.2 56.5
4 or 5 (high risk) 24.5 25 26.8 26
Random Assignment Date        
Before 10/96 35.3 35.6 36.0 * 36.5
10/96 to 6/97 28.5 31.3 30.2 30.8
After 6/97 36.2 33.1 33.8 32.7
Previously Enrolled in Head Start or Another Childhood Development Programe 13.1 14 12.8 13.4
Characteristics of Focus Child
Age (Months)        
Unborn 23.9 25.6 24.2 26.5
Less than 5 35.2 35.1 36.1 34.7
5 or more 40.8 39.3 39.7 38.7
Male 51 50.1 51.7 50.4
First Born 61.7 60.9 62.3 62.8 *
Birthweight Less than 2,500 Gramse 9.3 7.3 9.9 8.4 *
Born more than 3 Weeks Earlye 14.8 11.5 * 15.8 12
Stayed in Hospital After Birthe 17.4 16.2 18.3 16
People Concerned About the Child's Overall        
Health and Developmente 12.7 14.4 13 13.3
Received an Evaluation Because of Concerns
About the Child's Overall Health and
Development or Because of Suspected
Developmental Delaye
5.5 6.4 6 6.9
Risk Categories        
Has established riskse 11.6 10.2 11.6 10.6
Has biological or medical riskse 17.4 16.9 18.3 16.8
Has environmental riskse 31.9 36.6 * 32.5 36.4
Covered by Health Insurancee 91.4 92.3 90.1 * 89.6 *
Sample Size 1,107 1,003 1,513 1,488
SOURCE: HSFIS application and enrollment forms and 36-month PI data.

aSignificance levels are from tests comparing program and control group respondents.(back)

bSignificance levels are from tests comparing respondents and the full sample of respondents and nonrespondents in the program group.(back)

cSignificance levels are from tests comparing respondents and the full sample of respondents and nonrespondents in the control group.(back)

dThe primary caregiver is considered to be an adult regardless of her age.(back)

eThese variables pertain to families with focus children who were born at baseline.(back)

fThis index was constructed by summing the number of the following risk factors that the mother faced: (1) being a teenage mother; (2) having no high school credential; (3) receiving public assistance; (4) not being employed or in school or training, and (5) being a single mother.(back)

*Significantly different from zero at the .10 level, two-tailed test.

TABLE D.2C

COMPARISON OF THE BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS OF RESPONDENTS AND THE FULL SAMPLE OF RESPONDENTS AND NONRESPONDENTS TO THE 36-MONTH BAYLEY ASSESSMENT, BY RESEARCH STATUS
Variable Respondents Respondents and
Nonrespondents
Program
Group
Control
Groupa
Program
Groupb
Control
Groupc
Site Characteristics
Program Approach        
Center-based 24.7 22.1 20.2 * 20.6
Home-based 45.1 44.9 46.7 45.6
Mixed 30.3 33 33 33.9
Overall Implementation Pattern        
Early implementers 34.7 38.3 34.5 * 34.8 *
Later implementers 38.2 35.6 35 35.1
Incomplete implementers 27.1 26.2 30.5 30
Family and Parent Characteristics
Age of Mother at Birth of Focus Child        
Younger than 20 38.8 41 39 39.5
20 to 25 31.4 31 33.2 32
25 or older 29.8 28 27.9 28.5
Mother Was Younger than 19 at First Birth 42.2 43.3 42.9 41.2 *
Highest Grade Completed   &