Table of Contents | Previous | Next |
APPENDIX A
SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES
| Site | Number of Center Arrangements Observed |
Center Response Ratea (Percentage) |
Number of Family Child Care Arrangements Observed |
Family Child Care ResponseRatea (Percentage) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHS | Control | EHS | Control | EHS | Control | EHS | Control | |
| Center-Based | ||||||||
| Site #1 | 44 | 17 | 83 | 74 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 23 |
| Site #2 | 55 | 16 | 92 | 84 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 31 |
| Site #3 | 25 | 6 | 86 | 100 | 1 | 3 | 33 | 33 |
| Site #4 | 44 | 13 | 86 | 76 | 4 | 8 | 50 | 31 |
| Center Total | 168 | 52 | 87 | 80 | 5 | 18 | 33 | 30 |
| Home-Based | ||||||||
| Site #5 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 50 | 7 | 5 | 64 | 45 |
| Site #6 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 18 |
| Site #7 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 62 | 43 |
| Site #8 | 13 | 4 | 87 | 44 | 5 | 0 | 29 | 0 |
| Site #9 | 5 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 23 |
| Site #10 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 75 | 3 | 7 | 19 | 58 |
| Site #11 | 3 | 2 | 43 | 40 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 40 |
| Home Total | 25 | 10 | 45 | 30 | 30 | 27 | 29 | 28 |
| Mixed | ||||||||
| Site #12 | 13 | 8 | 72 | 62 | 3 | 6 | 21 | 43 |
| Site #13 | 11 | 2 | 73 | 17 | 13 | 9 | 62 | 45 |
| Site #14 | 3 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Site #15 | 31 | 7 | 91 | 54 | 3 | 0 | 43 | 0 |
| Site #16 | 11 | 2 | 79 | 50 | 7 | 8 | 64 | 57 |
| Site #17 | 12 | 11 | 71 | 69 | 6 | 7 | 50 | 50 |
| Mixed Total | 81 | 30 | 72 | 49 | 32 | 31 | 43 | 33 |
| Sample Total | 274 | 92 | 76 | 58 | 67 | 76 | 35 | 31 |
| aResponse rates indicate the percentage of eligible center or family child care arrangements we were able to locate and observe. |
| Site | Number of Center Arrangements Observeda |
Center Response Rateb (Percentage) |
Number of Family Child Care Arrangements Observeda |
Family Child Care Response Rateb (Percentage) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHS | Control | EHS | Control | EHS | Control | EHS | Control | |
| Center-Based | ||||||||
| Site #1 | 48 | 17 | 94 | 65 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| Site #2 | 50 | 11 | 88 | 79 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Site #3 | 19 | 5 | 76 | 83 | 4 | 1 | 67 | 14 |
| Site #4 | 45 | 15 | 96 | 65 | 1 | 11 | 13 | 69 |
| Center Total | 162 | 48 | 90 | 70 | 5 | 13 | 24 | 30 |
| Home-Based | ||||||||
| Site #5 | 8 | 1 | 50 | 50 | 13 | 7 | 100 | 64 |
| Site #6 | 6 | 2 | 55 | 33 | 6 | 9 | 24 | 41 |
| Site #7 | 3 | 1 | 75 | 25 | 10 | 5 | 48 | 42 |
| Site #8 | 13 | 9 | 68 | 60 | 4 | 0 | 24 | 0 |
| Site #9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Site #10 | 1 | 7 | 100 | 100 | 7 | 2 | 54 | 22 |
| Site #11 | 4 | 4 | 57 | 100 | 3 | 5 | 23 | 56 |
| Home Total | 35 | 24 | 49 | 55 | 43 | 29 | 39 | 32 |
| Mixed | ||||||||
| Site #12 | 15 | 3 | 71 | 43 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 15 |
| Site #13 | 9 | 8 | 64 | 62 | 15 | 4 | 54 | 20 |
| Site #14 | 10 | 0 | 91 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 0 |
| Site #15 | 30 | 9 | 86 | 53 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 27 |
| Site #16 | 17 | 7 | 100 | 64 | 10 | 2 | 71 | 25 |
| Site #17 | 12 | 17 | 52 | 74 | 7 | 5 | 50 | 36 |
| Mixed Total | 93 | 44 | 77 | 61 | 34 | 17 | 44 | 22 |
| Sample Total | 290 | 116 | 78 | 63 | 82 | 59 | 39 | 28 |
| aNumber of observed arrangements
were determined by the number of valid ITERS or FDCRS scales
we were able to calculate. Sample sizes for variables developed
from the C-COS are slightly larger.
bResponse rates indicate the percentage of eligible center or family child care arrangements we were able to locate and observe. |
| Site | Number of Center Arrangements Observed(a) |
Center Response Rate(b) (Percentage) |
Number of Family Child Care Arrangements Observed(a) |
Family Child Care Response Rate(b)
(Percentage) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHS | Control | EHS | Control | EHS | Control | EHS | Control | |
| Center-Based | ||||||||
| Site #1 | 43 | 25 | 91 | 83 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 30 |
| Site #2 | 47 | 14 | 100 | 74 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Site #3 | 17 | 18 | 65 | 90 | 1 | 1 | 33 | 20 |
| Site #4 | 46 | 15 | 102 | 75 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 57 |
| Center Total | 153 | 72 | 93 | 81 | 4 | 8 | 19 | 26 |
| Home-Based | ||||||||
| Site #5 | 20 | 5 | 63 | 45 | 9 | 6 | 150 | 60 |
| Site #6 | 9 | 4 | 100 | 50 | 4 | 9 | 15 | 43 |
| Site #7 | 19 | 15 | 86 | 94 | 5 | 8 | 29 | 50 |
| Site #8 | 12 | 4 | 36 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Site #9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Site #10 | 3 | 3 | 50 | 75 | 3 | 5 | 25 | 45 |
| Site #11 | 6 | 4 | 75 | 80 | 5 | 6 | 63 | 55 |
| Home Total | 69 | 35 | 55 | 42 | 26 | 34 | 28 | 38 |
| Mixed | ||||||||
| Site #12 | 20 | 8 | 80 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Site #13 | 10 | 7 | 67 | 41 | 11 | 2 | 46 | 25 |
| Site #14 | 10 | 2 | 67 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 40 |
| Site #15 | 25 | 19 | 78 | 86 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 13 |
| Site #16 | 15 | 8 | 63 | 73 | 6 | 3 | 75 | 27 |
| Site #17 | 14 | 22 | 58 | 76 | 6 | 2 | 46 | 25 |
| Mixed Total | 94 | 66 | 70 | 62 | 25 | 10 | 36 | 19 |
| Sample Total | 316 | 173 | 74 | 62 | 55 | 52 | 30 | 30 |
aNumber of observed arrangements were determined by the number of valid ECERS or FDCRS scales we were able to calculate. Sample sizes for variables developed from the C-COS are slightly larger. bResponse rates indicate the percentage of eligible center or family child care arrangements we were able to locate and observe. |
| Age of Child | 14 Months | 24 Months | 36 Months | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic at Enrollment | Program | Control | Program | Control | Program | Control |
| Pregnant | 10 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 8 | 15* |
| Child Was 5+ Months Old | 61 | 55 | 65 | 52 | 63 | 50* |
| Primary Language
Was not |
11 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 7 | 17** |
| Parent Lived with Partner | 13 | 24* | 15 | 31*** | 14 | 22* |
| Family Income 67%
to 99% of Poverty Line |
21 | 22 | 22 | 33* | 22 | 27 |
| Other Race | 2 | 10** | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11** |
| Parent Unemployed | 27 | 14* | 24 | 13 | 24 | 15 |
| Welfare Work Requirements(b) | 85 | 88 | 88 | 90 | 89 | 75*** |
| Sample Size | 165 | 51 | 162 | 48 | 153 | 72 |
Source: Sample is based on families who reported being in an eligible care arrangement whom we were able to observe for a valid ITERS or ECERS-R score Baseline characteristics taken from the HSFIS enrollment data. aParent reported English was not primary language spoken, but could speak English well. bFamily lived in a state with TANF work requirement for women with children younger than 12 months. *Difference is statistically significant at the .10 level. |
| Age of Child | 14-Months | 24-Months | 36-Months | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic at Enrollment | Program | Control | Program | Control | Program | Control |
| Child Was 5+ Months Old | 31 | 25 | 27 | 22 | 31 | 29 |
| Child had Environmental Risks | 52 | 22** | 30 | 33 | 43 | 39 |
| Pregnant | 30 | 32 | 36 | 39 | 34 | 38 |
| Teenage Mother | 61 | 36 | 49 | 43 | 45 | 51 |
| Parents had Less than 9 Years of Education | 10 | 0* | 9 | 8 | 4 | 4 |
| Primary Language Was not Englisha | 3 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Parent Lived with Partner | 10 | 18 | 10 | 22* | 9 | 19** |
| Adult Male in Household | 27 | 54*** | 27 | 47** | 23 | 42*** |
| Family Income 33% to 67% of Poverty Line | 33 | 14* | 38 | 31 | 33 | 35 |
| Family Income 67% to 99% of Poverty Line | 16 | 36** | 14 | 28* | 13 | 17 |
| Family Received Welfare | 67 | 42** | 64 | 50 | 71 | 49*** |
| African American | 55 | 36* | 49 | 36 | 46 | 38 |
| Parent in School or Training | 45 | 18*** | 35 | 20* | 31 | 20* |
| Parent Was Unemployed | 22 | 36 | 25 | 37 | 23 | 42*** |
| Urban = Setting | 37 | 68*** | 37 | 56* | 57 | 63 |
| Welfare Work Requirementsb | 19 | 29 | 21 | 8* | 42 | 32 |
Source: Sample is based on families who reported being in an eligible care arrangement whom we were able to observe for a valid ITERS or ECERS-R score. Baseline characteristics taken from the HSFIS enrollment data. aParent reported English was not primary language spoken, but could speak English well. bFamily lived in a state with TANF work requirement for women with children younger than 12 months. *Difference is statistically significant at the .10 level.
|
| Mean | SD | Minimum | Maximum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child Care Quality | ||||
| Mean ITERS (14 Months) | 4.7 | 1.12 | 1.50 | 6.80 |
| Mean ITERS (24 Months) | 5.0 | 1.08 | 1.65 | 6.76 |
| Mean ECERS (36 Months) | 5.0 | 1.11 | 1.24 | 6.82 |
| Mean ITERS (14 to 24 Months) | 4.8 | 1.10 | 1.57 | 6.76 |
| Mean ITERS/ECERS (14 to 36 Months) | 4.9 | 1.07 | 1.24 | 6.79 |
| Child-Adult Ratio (14 Months) | 2.9 | 1.23 | 0.83 | 7.70 |
| Child-Adult Ratio (24 Months) | 3.5 | 1.56 | 1.00 | 11.58 |
| Child-Adult Ratio (36 Months) | 5.5 | 2.64 | 0.78 | 14.83 |
| Child-Adult Mean Ratio (14 to 24 Months) | 3.3 | 1.37 | 0.93 | 11.58 |
| Child-Adult Mean Ratio (14 to 36 Months) | 4.2 | 1.87 | 0.78 | 13.10 |
| Child Care Intensity | ||||
| Average Weekly Center Hours, 14 Months | 22.9 | 17.67 | 0.0 | 75.0 |
| Average Weekly Center Hours, 24 Months | 26.9 | 17.39 | 0.0 | 80.0 |
| Average Weekly Center Hours, 36 Months | 28.3 | 17.01 | 0.0 | 60.0 |
| Average Weekly Center Hours, 14 to 24 Months | 24.7 | 15.49 | 5.50 | 55.0 |
| Average Weekly Center Hours, 14 to 36 Months | 26.1 | 12.75 | 1.33 | 55.0 |
| Child Outcomesa | ||||
| 24-Month BSID-MDI | 90.8 | 13.01 | 49.0 | 118.0 |
| 24-Month CDI:Language | 57.1 | 23.17 | 3.0 | 100.0 |
| 24-Month CBCL: Aggressive Behavior | 21.2 | 10.64 | 0.0 | 57.0 |
| 36-Month BSID-MDI | 91.9 | 11.83 | 51.0 | 121.0 |
| 36-Month PPVT-III | 84.5 | 15.03 | 40.0 | 125.0 |
| 36-Month CBCL | 18.2 | 10.64 | 0.0 | 62.0 |
| aBSID = Bayley Scales of Infant Development
Mental Development Index CDI = Communicative Development Inventory CBCL = Child Behavior Checklist PPVT-III = Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Third Edition |
| 24-Month Outcomes | 36-Month Outcomes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSID-MDI | CDI Language | CBCL Aggression |
BSID-MDI | PPVT-III | CBCL Aggression |
|
| Mean ITERS/ECERS-R | 1.58** | .53 | -.79 | .49 | 1.34* | .37 |
| (.74) | (1.37) | (.61) | (.64) | (.83) | (.60) | |
| Mean Child-Adult Ratio | .32 | -1.15 | .48 | .40 | .10 | -.27 |
| (.64) | (1.12) | (.50) | (.33) | (.43) | (.31) | |
| Mean Hours in Center Care | .13** | .06 | -.03 | .15*** | .15** | -.05 |
| (.06) | (.12) | (.05) | (.05) | (.06) | (.05) | |
| Adj R2 | .13*** | .04** | -.01 | .13*** | .17*** | -.01 |
| Sample Size | 284 | 308 | 306 | 336 | 293 | 328 |
| Note: Unstandardized beta coefficients (with standard errors)
presented. Mean scores from 14 to 24 months were included in
models predicting 24-month outcomes; mean scores from 14 to
36 months were included in models predicting 36-month outcomes.
All models control for the following: child gender, child age
at time of assessment, maternal race/ethnicity, education and
marital status, whether mother was teenage (<19 years) at
child’s birth, and whether site was urban.
*p < .10; **p < .05; ***p < .01. |
| Table of Contents | Previous | Next |

