Description:
The ASEBA uses information collected from parents and caregivers/teachers
to assess the behavioral, emotional, and social functioning
(including language development) of young children between
the ages of 1.5 and 5 years. To get a better understanding
of how the child functions under different conditions, it
is recommended that information be collected from more than
one adult. The ASEBA consists of two self-administered reporting
forms. The parent report consists of a 99-item child behavioral
checklist (CBC) and a language development survey (LDS) that
asks parents to provide the child’s best multi-word
phrases and words the child uses from a list of 310 words
The caregiver/teacher report (CTR) consists of a 99-item checklist
similar to the CBC except 17 family-specific items have been
replaced with group situation items. The 99 items in the CBC
are organized into seven syndromes and two broader groupings
of syndromes, while the 99 items in the CTR are organized
into six of the CBC syndromes and the two broader groupings:
- Internalizing
- Emotionally reactive
- Anxious/depressive
- Somatic complaints
- Withdrawn
- Externalizing
- Attention problems
- Aggressive behavior
- Ungrouped (CBC only)
The items are also organized into five DSM
(Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder)-oriented
scales.
Uses of Information:
The results can be used to structure interviews with parents,
identify areas for intervention, and evaluate intervention
outcomes.
Reliability: (1)
Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha):
the alphas for the CBC scales ranged from .66 to .92 for the
syndromes and .63 to .86 for the DSM-oriented scales. The
alphas were .89 and .92 for the two broader groupings (internalizing
and externalizing syndromes) and .95 for the total score.
The alphas for the CTR syndromes ranged from .52 to .96 and
for the DSM-oriented scales from .68 to .93. The alphas were
.89 and .96 for the internalizing and externalizing groupings
and for the total score, .97. (2) Test-retest reliability,
with an eight-day interval between tests: the correlations
were .85 and .76 for the CBC and CTR, respectively. Test-retest
studies on the LDS reported correlations greater or equal
to .90.
Validity: (1)
Concurrent validity: The CBC correctly classified 84 percent
of a sample of children (some of whom were diagnosed as having
emotional/behavioral problems), and the CTR correctly classified
74 percent of the children. Studies reported correlation coefficients
between the CBC problem syndromes and the Toddler Behavior
Screening Inventory and the Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional
Assessment ranging from .48 to .70. In 11 studies that compared
parent LDS scores with those obtained by trained examiners
using other measures, the correlations between the parent’s
score and the trained examiner’s ranged from .56 to
.87. Other studies found the level of LDS agreement with other
measures of language development ranged from .47 to .94. (2)
Predictive validity: An 11-year longitudinal study found that
children identified by the LDS to have language development
problems were more likely to have weak verbal skills at age
13.
Method of Scoring: ASEBA
can be hand or computer scored. Respondents complete the CBC
and CTR by circling one of three responses and the LDS by
circling the words the child uses spontaneously. The behavioral
raw scores are derived by summing the response item values
(0, 1, or 2) for the syndrome scale, syndrome groupings, and
total score. The raw score for the language development survey
is the total number of circled words. The manual provides
instructions for converting raw scores into T-scores.
Interpretability: Although
the ASEBA provides the user with T-scores to compare a child’s
performance against other children and the scoring forms classify
scores as normal (under 93 percent), borderline (93 to 97
percent), or clinical (over 97 percent), the authors recommend
that the results be interpreted by someone with some graduate
training.
Adaptations/Special
Instructions for Individuals with Disabilities: The
manual does not provide details about this, but suggests that
persons rating children with disabilities compare the child’s
behavior to their expectations of a typical same-age child.
Training Support:
None indicated, however, ASEBA was designed to be easy to
use and some support may be available on the internet.Adaptations/Special
Instructions for Individuals with Disabilities: The manual
does not provide details about this, but suggests that persons
rating children with disabilities compare the child’s
behavior to their expectations of a typical same-age child.
Report Preparation Support:
The manual shows a report generated by computer scoring software.
References:
Achenbach, Thomas M. and Leslie A. Rescorla.
Manual for the ASEBA Preschool Forms and Profiles.
ASEBA, Burlington, VT, 2000. |