Skip Navigation
Administration for Children and Families  
ACF
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™  |  Print      

Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE) skip to primary page content
Advanced
Search

 Table of Contents | Appendix C | Child Development Instruments | Parenting Instruments | Program Implementation and Quality Instruments

Previous Instrument | Next Instrument 

RECEPTIVE-EXPRESSIVE EMERGENT LANGUAGE TEST - SECOND EDITION (REEL-2), 1991

Authors:
Kenneth R. Bzoch and Richard League

Publisher:
PRO-ED
(800) 897-3202
www.proedinc.com

Initial Material Cost:
REEL-2 Complete Kit: $86 (includes Examiner's Manual and 25 Profile/Test Forms)

Representativeness of Norming Sample:
Not representative, norming sample included only white infants.

Languages:
English

Type of Assessment:
Direct child assessment

Age Range and Administration Interval:
0 to 3 years

Personnel, Training, Administration, and Scoring Requirements:
It is possible for a consultant or expert with clinical training to learn to administer the REEL-2 in two hours. The manual suggests that a trainee be observed by an individual with REEL-2 experience.
Administration time per child is 10 to 15 minutes; scoring time is 5 minutes.

Summary
Initial Material Cost: 1 (> $100)
Reliability: 3 (.65 or higher)
Validity: 1 (not available)
Norming Sample Characteristics: 2 (only white infants included)
Ease of Administration and Scoring: 3 (administered and scored by a clinician or expert with clinical training)


Description: The REEL-2 assesses communication behaviors (receptive and expressive) of infants and toddlers from birth to 3 years of age. The format is a 132-item checklist of language milestones, with 3 items contained in each of the 22 age intervals (age intervals vary from 1 to 3 months depending on the chronological age of the child). The examiner completes the checklist based on information provided by the child’s caregiver. Typically, more than three items need to be administered to obtain the ceiling age interval for the child (further details are provided in the “Method of Scoring” section below). The REEL-2 uses caregiver report to identify any major language problems. Scores derived from the REEL-2 include an Expressive Language Quotient, a Receptive Language Quotient and a Language Quotient. The REEL-2 is undergoing revision, and the publisher expects the third edition to be released in late 2003 or mid-2004.

Uses of Information: The primary uses of the REEL-2 are to (1) provide descriptions of the developmental status of young children in the language area, (2) assist with setting intervention goals, and (3) serve as a screening instrument for medically and environmentally at-risk populations. The REEL-2 is also used to determine the extent to which interventions have changed the language status of individual children.

Reliability: (1) Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha):.98 for 0 to 11 months, .97 for 12 to 23 months, and .95 for 24 to 36 months, with an average of .97. (2) Test-retest reliability: .90 to 1.0.

Validity: (1) Concurrent validity: studies showed that the REEL-2 relates well to normal expected levels of functioning (Eich, 1971). However, studies were completed on small samples with similar characteristics. (2) Predictive validity: no information available.

Method of Scoring: The examiner uses the child’s chronological age to determine the age interval from which the questions should first be asked. Behaviors observed for each item are scored as either typical of the child (+), emergent (+-), or never observed (-). Scores are computed by summing the (+) responses. The examiner then determines the ceiling interval, which is the highest age interval receiving at least two (+) item scores. The results of the Receptive Language Age and the Expressive Language Age are combined to form the Combined Language Age. Then, each of these scores (the Receptive Language Age, Expressive Language Age, and the Combined Language Age) are respectively divided by the child’s chronological age and multiplied by 100 to obtain a Receptive Quotient, an Expressive Quotient, and a Language Quotient.

Interpretability: The Examiner’s Manual includes average scores for the limited norming sample of children used to determine the validity of the REEL-2, but does not contain any overall score percentiles or cutoffs to guide interpretation of the REEL-2 scores. However, it does contain several interpretation guidelines, including the relationship between Receptive Language skills and hearing and nervous system disorders, as well as the relationship between delays in Receptive Language versus Expressive Language. It also includes suggestions for intervention strategies related to language stimulation.

Training Support: None described.

Adaptations/Special Instructions for Individuals with Disabilities: None described.

Report Preparation Support: The Examiner’s Manual contains general suggestions on how to present reports/recommendations to parents: (1) the interviewer should provide parents/caregivers with the REEL-2 manual and other relevant booklets; (2) information about the score should be accompanied by the interviewer’s explanation, which could include other interpretations and recommendations for intervention programs; and (3) the interviewer should avoid using technical language to explain the REEL-2 scores.

References:

Bzoch, Kenneth, and Richard League. Receptive-Expressive Emergent Language Test: A Method for Assessing the Language Skills of Infants, Second Edition. Austin: Pro-Ed, 1991.

Bzoch, Kenneth, and Richard League. Receptive-Expressive Emergent Language Test: A Method for Assessing the Language Skills of Infants, Second Edition: Examiner’s Manual. Austin: Pro-Ed, 1991.

Eich, W.F. A Validation Study for the REEL. (Unpublished manuscript), 1971.

 



 

 

 Table of Contents | Appendix C | Child Development Instruments | Parenting Instruments | Program Implementation and Quality Instruments

Previous Instrument | Next Instrument