Skip Navigation
Administration for Children and Families  
ACF
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™  |  Print      

Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE) skip to primary page content
Advanced
Search

 Table of Contents | Appendix C | Child Development Instruments | Parenting Instruments | Program Implementation and Quality Instruments

Previous Instrument | Next Instrument 

DEVEREUX EARLY CHILDHOOD ASSESSMENT (DECA), 1999

Authors:
Paul LeBuffe and Jack Naglieri

Publisher:
Kaplan Press
(800) 334-2014
www.kaplanco.com

Initial Material Cost:
$200

Representativeness of Norming Sample:
Two non-randomly selected samples of preschool children ages 2 through 5 from 28 states that closely represent the 1995 U.S. population on such important characteristics as age, gender, geographical region, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. One sample of 2,000 children was used to norm the protective scale and the other sample of 1,108 children was used to norm the behavioral problem scale.

Languages:
English; Spanish (Record Form only)

Type of Assessment:
Observation

Age Range and Administration Interval:
2 to 5 years, interval not prescribed, but there should be at least a four-week interval between assessments by the same adult.

Personnel, Training, Administration, and Scoring Requirements:
DECA raters need to be able to complete all of the items on the assessment and need to have observed the child’s behavior for a minimum of two hours per day, two days each week, over a period of four weeks. Raters can include parents or other family members, as well as teachers, and should be able to read at the sixth-grade level. DECA users administer the DECA and interpret the scores. They should be trained to interpret and use standardized assessment instruments, standardized scores, and profiles. They should know how to use and communicate results to family members and service providers. Users often include program directors, lead teachers, preschool mental health or educational consultants, and early childhood special educators.

Summary
Initial Material Cost: 2 ($100 to $200)
Reliability: 2 (internal consistency .65 or higher; test-retest .65 or higher; inter-rater mostly |.65).
Validity: 1 (criterion validity, using contrasted groups approach, is significant, but correlation coefficients not reported.)
Norming Sample Characteristics: 3 (normed within past 15 years, nationally representative).
Ease of Administration and Scoring: 3 (administered and scored by a highly trained individual).


Description: The DECA is a 37-item rating scale designed to evaluate self-protecting factors and behavioral concerns among preschool children ages 2 to 5. A 27-item Total Protective Factors scale that assesses self-protective factors represents a compilation of three subscales: Initiative, Self-control, and Attachment. In addition, a 10-item Behavioral Concern scale assesses challenging and problem behaviors that children may exhibit. Family members or early care and education professionals who have observed the focal child’s behavior over a period of at least four weeks can complete the DECA, which yields raw scores, percentile scores, T-scores, normal curve equivalent scores, and individual profiles.

Uses of Information: The DECA is used to (1) develop an individual profile to identify strengths and weakness of self-protective factors in order to develop strategies to strengthen these abilities to reduce behavioral problems of pre-school children; (2) develop a classroom profile that identifies the relative strengths of all children in a classroom in order that classroom strategies might be implemented to build upon strengths and promote healthy social and emotional child development; (3) identify children with behavioral problems through the Behavioral Concerns Scale so that interventions can be made before behavioral disorders develop; (4) help Head Start programs to meet Program Performance Standards; (5) assist early childhood programs in building on children’s strengths to promote healthy child development; (6) provide programs with an outcome measure that can be compared over time to evaluate the effectiveness of prevention and intervention strategies; (7) compare scores between different raters for the same child to explore any differences that might exist in a child’s behavior across different environments; and (8) provide a measure of self-protective factors in preschool children that can be used for research purposes.

Reliability: (1) Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha): total protective factors scale alpha is .91 (.76 to .86 for the individual protective scales) for parent raters and .94 (.85 to .90 for the individual scales) for teacher raters and for behavioral concerns, .71 and .80, respectively. (2) test-retest reliability: total protective factors scale reliability coefficient is .74 (.55 to .80 for the individual scales) for parent raters and .94 (.87 to .91 for individual scales) for teacher raters and for behavioral concerns, .55 and .68, respectively. (3) inter-rater reliability: coefficients for total protective factors scale are .21 (.26 to .33 for the individual scales) pairs of teacher raters, .69 (.57 to .77 for the individual scales) among pairs of parent raters, and .29 (.19 to .34 for individual scales) among pairs of parent-teacher raters. Coefficients for behavior concerns are .44 among pairs of parents, .62 among pairs of teachers, and .23 for pairs of parent-teacher raters.

Validity: (1) Content-related validity: comparison to well-established measures or related research findings not possible since DECA is the first behavior rating scale to examine self-protective factors; however, the items selected for the DECA were based on an extensive review of the literature on resilience, as well as results from focus groups with parents and teachers. Factor analysis procedures were used to select the items for each of the protective scales and the 10 items in the Behavioral Concerns Scale. (2) Criterion validity: The DECA scores of a group of pre-school children with identified emotional and behavioral problems were found to have significantly lower protective factor scale scores and significantly higher behavioral concern than a matched sample of children with no identified emotional and behavioral problems. Using the same samples, the authors correctly predicted group members for 69 percent of the children using the Total Protective Factor Scale and 71 percent of the group membership using the Behavioral Concerns Scale. 1 (3) Construct validity: The authors reported findings consistent with DECA’s theoretical construct. Low- to average-risk children with high protective factors had the lowest behavioral concern scores, while high-risk children with low protective factors had the highest behavioral concern scores.

Method of Scoring: Raters complete the Record Form by indicating the number of times they have observed the child performing particular behaviors in the past four months. For each item, they place a checkmark next to one of the following descriptors: never, rarely, occasionally, frequently, or very frequently. The checkmarks are then transferred onto a separate page of the Record Form, where corresponding boxes have raw score values that correspond to each rating: never = 0, rarely = 1, occasionally = 2, frequently = 3, and very frequently = 4. To score the DECA, examiners copy the raw score value (0-4) from the box with its raw score to an empty box that corresponds to the item being scored. The raw scores for the items that comprise each of the scales are summed to obtain the scale raw scores. The scale raw scores for the Initiative, Self-control, and Attachment scales are then summed to obtain the Total Protective Factors Scale Raw Score, which does not include the Behavioral Concerns scale raw score. The raw scores are converted into T-scores and percentiles through the use of the Individual Profile form or tables in the manual. The manual provides tables to help interpret the differences between scores on the protective sub-scales, by different raters, and over time.

Interpretability: High scores on the Protective Factor scales indicate that a child is doing well, while high scores on the Behavioral Concerns scale may indicate the need for intervention. It is difficult to interpret the meaning of raw scores, so they are converted into percentile scores, T-scores, or normal curve equivalents. This allows scores to be compared to ratings that children typically receive on the scales. T-scores on the DECA range from 30 to 70, and are classified as Below Average (30-40), Average (41-59), or Above Average (60-70). Above Average scores on the Behavioral Concerns scale and Below Average scores on the Total Protective Factors scale may warrant attention. The DECA scores need to be interpreted in the context of other information, including DECA scores from other individuals, and the cultural and family background.

Training Support: Training support is available through the Devereux Foundation and includes introduction and basic implementation sessions, as well as a train-the-trainer session. The cost of training sessions ranges from $550 to $1,100 plus additional fees for travel and preparation. The following technical assistance options are also available, upon request, through the Devereux Foundation: (1) on-site visits with dev-ereux certified trainers who provide one-on-one technical assistance for a cost of $500 per day plus travel and one day of preparation; (2) video conferences to provide refresher training; (3) telephone conferences with DECA program developers and trainers; and (4) a web-based listserv discussion forum.

Adaptations/Special Instructions for Individuals with Disabilities: None described.

Report Preparation Support: Individual and Classroom Profiles are used to graphically display results from the DECA on all five scales. Several examples of DECA Individual Profiles are presented and interpreted, along with suggestions for an intervention plan.

References:

LeBuffe, Paul and Jack Naglieri. Devereux Early Childhood Assessment: User’s Guide. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan Press, 1999.

LeBuffe, Paul and Jack Naglieri. Devereux Early Childhood Assessment: Technical Manual. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan Press, 1999.


1 Factor analysis is a statistical procedure that examines the strength of the association items have with a shared factor. The researcher assigns the meaning to a factor based on the items that are most strongly correlated to the factor. (back)

 



 

 

 Table of Contents | Appendix C | Child Development Instruments | Parenting Instruments | Program Implementation and Quality Instruments

Previous Instrument | Next Instrument 
ing software can be purch