Skip Navigation
Administration for Children and Families  
ACF
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™  |  Print      

Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE) skip to primary page content
Advanced
Search

 Table of Contents | Appendix C | Child Development Instruments | Parenting Instruments | Program Implementation and Quality Instruments

Previous Instrument | Next Instrument 

EARLY CHILDHOOD ENVIRONMENT RATING SCALE - Revised Edition (ECERS-R), 1998

Authors:
Thelma Harms, Richard M. Clifford, and Debby Cryer
www.fpg.unc.edu

Publisher:
Teachers College Press
www.teacherscollegepress.com
1-800-575-6566

Initial Material Cost:
ECERS-R Assessment Scale: $13;
Video training: $59;
Workbook: $4

Representativeness of Norming Sample:
Research reported in manual does not include this information

Languages:
English 1

Type of Assessment:
Observation, with some caregiver report

Age Range and Administration Interval:
For classrooms enrolling children 2 1/2 to 5 years of age.

Personnel, Training, Administration, and Scoring Requirements:
The individual administering the ECERS-R must read and practice the scale, and must also have knowledge of child development and educational implications. The authors recommend reviewers to have at least two practice observation sessions with an experienced ECERS-R trainer. Administration time ranges from 2 hours to 5 hours depending on the scoring option selected for administering the assessment.

Summary
Initial Material Cost: 1 (> $100)
Reliability: 3 (.65 or higher for internal consistency)
Validity: 1 (concurrent not available, predictive is promising)
Norming Sample Characteristics: 1 (none described)
Ease of Administration and Scoring: 3 (administered and scored by a highly trained individual)


1 Please contact Thelma Harms to obtain information about other official translations. (back)

Description: The ECERS-R is designed to assess group programs for children of preschool age (2 1/2 to 5). It is a 43-item assessment tool rating scale organized into seven environmental subscales: Space and Furnishings, Personal Care Routines, Language-Reasoning, Activities, Interaction, Program Structure, and Parents and Staff. Each item has a number of quality indicators. The ECERS-R can be used in preschool, kindergarten, and child care classrooms. The original ECERS was revised to reflect changes in the early childhood field and to be more inclusive of children with disabilities and sensitive to cultural diversity.

Uses of Information: The assessment can be used by program directors for supervision and program improvement, by teaching staff for self-assessment, by agency staff for monitoring, and in teacher training programs.

Reliability: (1) Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) ranged from .71 to .88 at the subscale level; the total scale internal consistency was .92. (2) Inter-observer reliability was .92 (Pearson correlation) and .87 (Spearman correlation).

Validity: Concurrent validity information is not available in the manual. However, the original version of the ECERS has been demonstrated to have good predictive validity (Peisner-Feinberg and Burchinal 1997), indicating that quality of center-based child care (measured using the ECERS-R) was related to preschool children’s concurrent cognitive and socioemotional development (measured using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised and the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement-Revised).

Method of Scoring: The scoring sheet records the ratings for quality indicators, items, subscale and total scores, as well as any observer comments. The indicators, which have Yes/No/Not applicable response choices, are used to score the items, which have scores ranging from 1 (Inadequate) to 7 (Excellent). There are two ways to score the items. The manual provides detailed instructions on both scoring systems. The usual scoring system for each item is based on the number of the highest quality indicators with affirmative responses. Under the alternate scoring method, each indicator is individually scored (using the 1 to 7 range), which could extend the assessment time to a total of 4 to 5 hours. A Profile sheet is also provided to graphically display the scoring information, to compare areas of strengths and weaknesses, and to select items and subscales to target for improvement. The profiles for at least two observations can be plotted side by side to depict changes visually. Sample profile forms are available on the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center website (www.fpg.unc.edu).

Interpretability: Full instructions for using the scale, plus notes clarifying selected scale items are included. However, the manual provides no information about interpreting the results of the observation.

Training Support: The assessment tool includes instructions for using the ECERS-R; a Video training package and workbook are also available. The website: www.fpg.unc.edu includes helpful information.

Adaptations/Special Instructions for Individuals with Disabilities: The revised version includes new items to assess program’s services for children with disabilities. However, the revision needs field-testing and standardization.

Report Preparation Support: Not included in the manual.

References:

Harms, Thelma, Richard M. Clifford and Debby Cryer. Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale, Revised Edition. New York: Teachers College Press, 1998.

Harms, Thelma and Debby Cryer. Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Video Observations, Revised Edition. New York: Teachers College Press, 1999.

Harms, Thelma and Debby Cryer. Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale Video Guide & Training Workbook, Revised Edition. New York: Teachers College Press, 1999.

Peisner-Feinberg, E., and M. Burchinal. “Relations Between Preschool Children’s Child Care Experiences and Concurrent Development: The Cost, Quality and Outcomes Study.” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, vol. 43, no. 3, 1997, pp. 451-477.

www.fpg.unc.edu



 

 

 Table of Contents | Appendix C | Child Development Instruments | Parenting Instruments | Program Implementation and Quality Instruments

Previous Instrument | Next Instrument