Skip Navigation
Administration for Children and Families  
ACF
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™  |  Print      

Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE) skip to primary page content
Advanced
Search

 Table of Contents | Appendix C | Child Development Instruments | Parenting Instruments | Program Implementation and Quality Instruments

Previous Instrument | Next Instrument 

CENTER FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES DEPRESSION SCALE (CES-D), 1985

Authors:
L.S. Radloff

Publisher:
National Institute of Mental Health

Initial Material Cost:
None

Representativeness of Norming Sample:
Scale not normed.

Languages:
English

Type of Assessment:
Self-report

Age Range and Administration Interval:
Intended for individuals over 18

Personnel, Training, Administration, and Scoring Requirements:
No training is required. The scale takes about 10 minutes to complete, and only a few minutes to score.

Summary
Initial Material Cost: 1 (> $100)

Reliability: Internal consistency: 3 (.65 or higher); Test-retest: 2 (|.65)
Validity: Concurrent: 3 (.5 or higher)
Norming Sample Characteristics: 1 (none described)
Ease of Administration and Scoring: 2 (self-administered)


Description: The Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item instrument that can be self-administered or administered with minimal involvement by an interviewer. The instrument was developed by the National Institute of Mental Health to detect major or clinical depression in the general (nonpsychiatric) adult population (i.e., persons older than 18), specifically the frequency and duration of cognitive, affective, and behavioral depressive symptoms (within the past week).

Uses of Information: The CES-D is used for initial screening of symptoms related to depression or psychological distress. However, because the CES-D does not assess the full-range of depression symptoms (for example, it does not assess suicidality) and because it assesses the occurrence of the symptoms during the past week, users are cautioned against relying on the CES-D exclusively. It has also been used extensively for research purposes to investigate levels of depression among the nonpsychiatric population.

Reliability: (1) Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) ranged from .84 to .90 in field studies. (2) Test-retest reliability: Ranges from .51 to .67 in 2- to 8-week intervals and .41 to .54 in 3-to 12-month intervals.

Validity: (1) Concurrent validity: studies have examined the degree to which CES-D scores are in agreement with other measures of depression. These studies found CES-D to have correlations ranging from .50s to .80s with the Hamilton rating scale, .30s to .80s with the Raskin rating scale, .40s to .50s with the Lubin Depression Adjective Checklist, .60s and .20s, respectively, with the Bradburn Affect Balance Scale’s Negative Affect and Positive Affect Scales, .50s with the Langner scale and .43 with the Cantril life satisfaction ladder. Discriminant validity tests found CES-D to be less successful in differentiating between depression and other types of emotional responses, such as anger, fear, and boredom.

Method of Scoring: Respondents indicate the frequency or duration of time (in the past week) during which they have experienced certain feelings/situations. They circle a number between 0 and 3; 0 indicates that the situation occurred “rarely or none of the time” (less than 1 day), 1 indicates “some or a little of the time” (1 to 2 days), 2 indicates “occasionally or a moderate amount of time” (3 to 4 days), and 3 indicates “most or all of the time” (5 to 7 days). After adjusting the scores for the four positive-feature items, the item scores are summed to obtain the total scale score.

Interpretability: The possible range of total scores is from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater distress. Radloff, the author of the scale, suggests that that a total score of 16 be used as the cutoff to indicate “case” depression. However, other studies have suggested that scores of 0 to 15.5 be interpreted to indicate that an individual is “not depressed”, 16 to 20.5 to indicate “mild depression”, 21 to 30.5 to indicate “moderate depression”, and 31 or higher to indicate “severe depression”. It is suggested that the scale be used only as an indicator of symptoms relating to depression, not as a means to clinically diagnose depression. Therefore, higher scores on the CES-D scale may indicate a need for further clinical tests/screenings. However, because of the CES-D’s limitations, a low score does not necessarily indicate the absence of clinical depression.

Training Support: None described.

Adaptations/Special Instructions for Individuals with Disabilities: None described.

Report Preparation Support: None described.

References:

Devins, Gerald M. and Carolee M. Orme. “Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale.” In Test Critiques, edited by D.J. Keyser and R.C. Sweetland. Kansas City, MO: Test Corporation of America, 1985.

Radloff, L.S. “The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population.” Applied Psychological Measurement, vol. 1, 1977, pp. 385-401.

 



 

 

 Table of Contents | Appendix C | Child Development Instruments | Parenting Instruments | Program Implementation and Quality Instruments

Previous Instrument | Next Instrument