Table of Contents | Previous | Next |
List of Tables, Figures, and Boxes
TABLES
ES.1 Years 1-2, Impacts on UI-Covered Employment and Earnings
ES.2 Impacts on Public Assistance and Measured Income
1.1 Comparison of Services Provided in the Texas ERA Program and in the Control Group Program (Choices)
1.2 Selected Characteristics of Texas ERA Group Members
1.3 Overview of Report Sample Sizes, by Site and Research Group
2.1 Organizational Roles, Key Partners, and Staffing Arrangements in the Texas ERA Program
2.2 Receipt Rates, Timing, and Duration of Stipends in the ERA Program
2.3 Extent of Contact Between ERA Case Managers and Clients
2.4 Description of Contact Between ERA Case Managers and Clients
2.5 Topics Covered During Contact Between ERA Case Managers and Clients
3.1 Year 1 Impacts on Contacts with Program Staff
3.2 Impacts on Areas in Which Respondent Received Help
3.3 Impacts on Participation in Job Search, Education, Training, and Other Activities
3.4 Impacts on Receipt of Mental Health, Domestic Violence, and Substance Abuse Services
4.1 Years 1-2, Impacts on UI-Covered Employment and Earnings
4.2 Impacts on Public Assistance and Measured Income
4.3 Impacts on Characteristics of Current Job
4.4 Impacts on Employment Retention
A.1 Description of ERA Projects
E.1 Impacts on Quarterly UI-Covered Employment and Earnings for the Report Sample and Early Cohort, by City
E.2 Impacts on Household Income and Composition
E.3 Impacts on Other Outcomes
E.4 Impacts on Wage Growth and Advancement for Current/Most Recent Job
E.5 Years 1-2, Impacts on UI-Covered Employment
E.6 Year 1 Impacts on UI-Covered Employment and Earnings for Sample Members in the Full Sample
E.7 Years 1-2, Impacts on TANF Receipt and Payments
E.8 Years 1-2, Impacts on Food Stamp Receipt and Payments
E.9 Years 1-2, Impacts on UI-Covered Employment and Earnings Based on Length of Employment History in the Three Years Prior to Random Assignment
E.10 Years 1-2, Impacts on UI-Covered Employment and Earnings, Corpus Christi and Fort Worth, Texas
E.11 Years 1-2, Impacts on UI-Covered Employment and Earnings
E.12 Selected Characteristics of Texas ERA Sample Members
E.13 Years 1-2, Impacts on UI-Covered Employment and Earnings for Sample Members, by Mandatory Registration
E.14 Years 1-2, Impacts on Employment and Earnings Among Subgroups Defined by Previous Work Experience and Educational Attainment
E.15 Years 1-2, Impacts on UI-Covered Employment and Earnings for Sample Members in the Full Sample (Unadjusted Run)
E.16 Years 1-2, Impacts on Employment and Earnings Among Subgroups Defined by UI-Covered Employment in the Prior Year
E.17 Most Common Industries/Occupations Among the Currently Employed
F.1 Estimated Regression Coefficients for the Probability of Being a Respondent on the ERA 12-Month Survey, Corpus Christi
F.2 Background Characteristics of Survey Respondents, Corpus Christi
F.3 Comparison of Impacts for the Report, Fielded, and Respondent Samples in Corpus Christi
F.4 Estimated Regression Coefficients for the Probability of Being a Respondent on the ERA 12-Month Survey, Fort Worth
F.5 Background Characteristics of Survey Respondents, Fort Worth
F.6 Comparison of Impacts for the Report, Fielded, and Respondent Samples in Fort Worth
F.7 Estimated Regression Coefficients for the Probability of Being a Respondent on the ERA 12-Month Survey, Houston
F.8 Background Characteristics of Survey Respondents, Houston
F.9 Comparison of Impacts for the Report, Fielded, and Respondent Samples in Houston
FIGURES
ES.1 Estimated Eligibility for and Use of the ERA Stipend Among 100 TANF Applicants and Recipients in Corpus Christi
2.1 Typical Paths of Individuals Through the Texas ERA Program
2.2 Percentage of Program Group Members Receiving the ERA Stipend in Corpus Christi, by Quarter After Random Assignment
2.3 Percentage Receiving the ERA Stipend Among the Full Sample and Key Subgroups Defined by Pre-Random Assignment Status
2.4 Estimated Eligibility for and Use of the ERA Stipend Among 100 TANF Applicants and Recipients in Corpus Christi
2.5 Summary of How Texas ERA Case Managers Typically Spend Their Time
4.1 Percentage Employed According to UI Records and Receiving the ERA Stipend, Corpus Christi
E.1 Impacts on TANF Payments and TANF Receipt Rates for the Report Sample and Early Cohort Over Time
E.2 Estimated Eligibility for and Use of the ERA Stipend Among 100 TANF Applicants and Recipients in Fort Worth
E.3 Estimated Eligibility for and Use of the ERA Stipend Among 100 TANF Applicants and Recipients in Houston
E.4 Impacts on Program Participation for Key Subgroups in Corpus Christi
E.5 Impacts on Program Participation for Key Subgroups in Fort Worth
E.6 Impacts on Program Participation for Key Subgroups in Houston
E.7 Percentage Employed According to UI Records and Receiving the ERA Stipend, Fort Worth
E.8 Percentage Employed According to UI Records and Receiving the ERA Stipend, Houston
E.9 Impacts on UI-Covered Earnings and Employment for the Report Sample and Early Cohort Over Time
BOXES
1.1 The Design of Programs Using Financial Incentives to Promote Work
2.1 Corpus Christi’s Performance Management System
2.2 Employer Site Visits in Corpus Christi
3.1 Measuring Participation in ERA
3.2 How to Read the Tables in This Report
F.1 Key Analysis Samples in Corpus Christi
F.2 Key Analysis Samples in Fort Worth
F.3 Key Analysis Samples in Houston
| Table of Contents | Previous | Next |