Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      

Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation (OPRE) skip to primary page content
Advanced
Search

 Table of Contents | Previous | Next

CHAPTER 3

DEMOGRAPHICS

Table 3.1 compares the demographic characteristics of the substance abuse and non-affected samples. The typical substance abuse sample member was in her mid-thirties, African-American, not married, was the mother of 3 to 4 children, had not completed high school, and earned less than 50% of the poverty threshold. The typical non-affected sample member was in her late twenties, African-American, not married, was the mother of 2-3 children, had completed high school, and earned above 50% of the poverty threshold. Overall, the non-affected sample was significantly younger, had fewer children, and was more educated.

  Substance
Abuser (n=214)
Nonsubstance
Abuser (n=69)
Agea 36 (6.6) 28(8.1)
Race
  African-American 95 86
  Hispanic 3 10
  Other 2 4
Marital Status
  Married 2 3
  Divorced/Widowed/Separated 19 19
  Never Married 79 78
  Childrena 3.3 (1.9) 2.8 (1.7)
Education
  High School or Greater 44 57
  Did Not Complete High School 56 43
Income*
  Extreme Poverty 55 43
  Poverty 40 46
  Low Income 5 11
a Numbers represent: mean (standard deviation).
* The income classes are derived from the ratio of the family's income to the family's poverty threshold for a single parent family with three children. According to the U.S. Census 2000, $17,524 is the poverty threshold. Extreme poverty is less than 50 percent of the poverty threshold (<$8,762). Poverty is between 50 and 99 percent of the poverty threshold ($8,762-$17,349). Low income is between 100 and 199 percent of the poverty threshold ($17,349-$34,873). Percentages for this sample represent approximates. No participants in this sample had incomes above the low income threshold.

 

Figure 3.A compares cumulative total years receiving welfare benefits for the substance abuse and non-affected samples. The substance abuse sample spent significantly more total time on welfare than the non-affected sample. On average the substance abuse sample spent 12 years (SD=8.5) versus 5.8 years (SD=5.5) for the non-affected sample. Figure 3.A also indicates that groups differed for long and short stays on welfare. About 36% of substance abusers received welfare benefits for more than 15 years versus only 7% of the comparison sample. Conversely, 66% of the non-affected sample received welfare benefits less than six years versus 28% of the substance abuse sample.

Figure 3.A Years on Welfare
[D]

 



 

 

 Table of Contents | Previous | Next