Table of Contents | Previous | Next |
Paths to Welfare Rural Places: Key Findings and Lessons from the Impact Evaluation of the Future Scope Rural Welfare-to-Work Program
This report may contain external links. ACF cannot attest to the accuracy of information provided by external links. Providing links to a non-ACF Website does not constitute an endorsement by ACF or any of its employees of the sponsors of the site or the information or products presented on the site. Also, be aware that the privacy protection provided on the ACF domain (see ACF's Privacy Policy) may not be available at the external link.
-
SELECTING PROMISING RURAL PROGRAMS FOR THE DEMONSTRATION
Program Selection Criteria
Testing Case Management in a Rural Context
WELFARE-TO-WORK IN RURAL ILLINOIS: THE FUTURE STEPS PROGRAM
EVALUATION DESIGN AND METHODS
Implementation and Cost Study
Impact Study
-
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT, STAFFING, AND SERVICE DELIVERY
THE FUTURE STEPS TARGET POPULATION
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS: THE ECONOMIC, POLICY, AND SERVICE CONTEXT
KEY FINDINGS ON FUTURE STEPS IMPLEMENTATION
CLIENT EXPERIENCES IN FUTURE STEPS
COSTS OF FUTURE STEPS
-
IMPACTS ON EMPLOYMENT, SELF-SUFFICIENCY, AND WELL-BEING
DIFFERENCES IN THE USE OF SERVICES AND RESOURCES
IMPACTS ON EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS
CHANGES IN WELFARE DEPENDENCE AND SELF-SUFFICIENCY
IMPACTS ON WELL-BEING AND QUALITY OF LIFE
DIFFERENCES IN PROGRAM IMPACTS FOR KEY SUBGROUPS
-
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IMPROVING PROGRAM INNOVATION IN RURAL AREAS
POSSIBLE REASONS FOR THE LACK OF PROGRAM IMPACTS
LESSONS FOR IMPLEMENTING FUTURE PROGRAMS IN RURAL AREAS
IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING WELFARE-TO-WORK PROGRAMS IN RURAL AREAS
ADDRESSING CONSTRAINTS OF SCALE: ISSUES FOR EVALUATING RURAL PROGRAMS
APPENDIX A: SURVEY DATA COLLECTION AND WEIGHTING METHODS
APPENDIX B: ADDITIONAL COST STUDY ANALYSES: COSTS BY PROGRAM COMPONENT
| Table of Contents | Previous | Next |

