Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      

 

Office of Refugee Resettlement   Advanced
Search


Annual ORR Reports to Congress - 2003

Wilson/Fish Alternative Program

The Wilson/Fish amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act, contained in the FY 1985 Contin­uing Resolution on Appropriations, directed the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to develop alternatives to the regular State-administered program for the purpose of:

  • Increasing refugee self-sufficiency,

  • Avoiding welfare dependency, and

  • Increasing coordination among service providers and resettlement agencies.

The Wilson/Fish authority allows projects to establish or maintain a refugee program in a State where the State is not participating in the refugee program or is dropping out of the refugee program or a portion of the program. These projects are considered under Category 1 in the Wilson/Fish announcement.

The Wilson/Fish authority also provides public and private non-profit agencies the opportunity to develop new approaches for the provision of cash and medical assistance, social services, and case management. These projects are considered under Category 2 in the Wilson/Fish announcement.

No additional funding is appropriated for Wilson/Fish projects; funds are drawn instead from regular cash and medical assistance grants and social services allocations. Wilson/Fish alternative projects typically contain several of the following elements:

  • Creation of a "front-loaded" service system which provides i­ntensive services to refugees in the early months after arrival with an emphasis on early employment.

Wilson/Fish Grantees

State/County Grantee

RCA for TANF- Types

RMA

Social Services

Alabama - Catholic Social Services of Mobile (Cat. 1)

No

Yes

Yes

Alaska - Catholic Social Services (Cat. 1)

No

Yes

Yes

Colorado Department of Human Services (Cat. 2)

Yes

No

Yes

Kentucky - Catholic Charities of Louisville (Cat. 1)

No

Yes

Yes

Massachusetts Office of Refugees and Immigrants (Cat.2)

No

No

Yes

Nevada - Catholic Charities of Southern Nevada (Cat. 1)

No

Yes

Yes

North Dakota Department of Human Services (Cat. 2)

Yes

No

Yes

San Diego - Catholic Charities (Cat 2)

Yes

No

Yes

South Dakota - LSS of South Dakota (Cat 2)

Yes

No

Yes

Vermont - IRSA (Cat. 2)

Yes

No

No

Idaho (Mountain States) (Cat.1)

Yes

No

Yes

  • Integration of case management, cash assistance, and employment services generally under a single private agency that is equipped to work with refugees.

  • Innovative strategies for the provision of cash assistance, through incentives, bonuses, and income disregards.

In FY 2003, Wilson/Fish projects were operated by private non-profit agencies in Alaska, Kentucky, Nevada, South Dakota, Alabama, Vermont, Idaho, and San Diego County, California. In addition, there were three Wilson/Fish projects, (Massachusetts, Colorado, and North Dakota) that were publicly administered.

As in past years, Wilson/Fish program managers worked closely with ORR staff to establish outcome goal plans for their programs. The program goals established for FY 2003 are based on the program measures adopted for the State-administered program. For an explanation of each program measure and the outcomes for each project, see the section entitled "Partnerships to Improve Employment and Self-Sufficiency Out-comes," beginning on page 16.

Matching Grant Program

Calendar Year (CY) 2003 marked the 24th anniversary of the Matching Grant program. In those twenty-four years, more than 2 million refugees have come to this country and nearly 535,000 refugees (over 26 percent of all refugees) were served through the Matching Grant program. In CY 2003, more than 25,200 refugees, Cuban/Haitian Entrants, asylees and victims of trafficking participated. These 25,200 refugees were served by 241 affiliate sites of the nine voluntary agencies, or Volags, in 123 cities in 42 States. ORR had projected 26,172 clients to be served, but the shortfall in arrivals in FY 2003 took its toll on the program. Agencies took extraordinary measures to conduct outreach to asylees and Cuban/Haitian entrants to maintain the program and only two agencies did not meet their projected caseload. Despite the downturn in the economy, and its particular impact on traditional entry-level jobs, the program was successful in achieving self-sufficiency at 120 days for 70 percent of its clients.

The Matching Grant program, funded by Congress since 1979, provides an alternative approach to State-administered resettlement assistance. The program's goal is to help refugees attain self-sufficiency within four months after arrival, without access to public cash assistance. Participating agencies agree to match the ORR grant with cash and in-kind contributions; twenty percent of their match must be in cash. The Agency must match at least $1,000 for each $2,000 in Federal funds per enrollment.

The Matching Grant program is characterized by a strong emphasis on early employment and intensive services during the first four months after arrival. ORR requires participating agencies to provide maintenance (food and housing), case management, and employment services in-house. Additional services, such as language training and medical assistance, may be provided in-house or arranged through referral to other programs. Refugees in the Matching Grant program may use publicly funded medical assistance.

The Matching Grant voluntary agencies work with ORR staff to establish goal plans to measure continuous improvement in client outcomes. Because the program emphasizes family self-sufficiency (independence from cash assistance), goal plans measure the proportion of cases that are self-sufficient at four months after arrival in the U.S. and self-sufficiency retention two months later. Goal plans establish self-sufficiency and retention goals for individual participants as well as cases. Goals are also established for individual refugees in terms of job placements, wages, and health benefits. Summaries of the progress reports of the nine participating agencies follow, with all data reported over the calendar year. [1]

Church World Service (CWS) received $3,300,000 to enroll 1,650 refugees in 31 sites (22 main offices and 9 sub-offices). CWS enrolled 1,667 refugees despite the dramatic decline in arrivals, including the 1,650 refugees projected for the year plus an additional 17 refugees served with funds from the original grant award. CWS reported that 1,129 clients achieved self-sufficiency of the 1,562 that reached the 120-day mark, or 72 percent. The primary groups enrolled were Cubans, Liberians, and Sudanese. The largest sites were Miami, Florida; Richmond, Virginia; and Atlanta, Georgia.

CWS

Cases

Individuals

Self-sufficient (120 days)[2]

518

72 %

1129

72 %

Self-sufficient (180 days)

561

96 %

1171

96 %

Entered Employment

   

707

73 %

Average Hourly Wage

Health Benefits[3]

   

$7.94

391

 

62 %

Episcopal Migration Ministries (EMM) received $1,864,000 to serve 932 refugees at 24 sites in the Matching Grant program. Despite the low number of arrivals after September 11, 2001, EMM enrolled all 932 refugees and asylees. The largest ethnic groups served were Bosnian and Sudanese.

EMM

Cases

Individuals

         

Self-sufficient (120 days)

417

71 %

829

 73 %

Self-sufficient (180 days)

246

98 %

722

82 %

Entered Employment

   

519

66 %

Average Hourly Wage

Health Benefits

   

$7.88

343

 

70 %

Ethiopian Community Development Council (ECDC) received $1,212,000 in CY 2003 to serve 606 Matching Grant clients in six sites. ECDC ultimately enrolled a total of 586 refugees into Matching Grant. The major ethnic groups served arrived from Sudan, Bosnia, and Somalia.

ECDC

Cases

Individuals

Self-sufficient (120 days)

225

74 %

436

  76 %

Self-sufficient (180 days)

200

99 %

423

99.5 %

Entered Employment

   

265

68 %

Average Hourly Wage

Health Benefits

   

$8.52

130

 

56 %


Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS) requested $4,504,000 to support activities in CY 2003 to serve 2,252 clients. HIAS ultimately served 1,299 clients in the Matching Grantprogram, the vast majority from the successor republics of the former Soviet Union and Iran. Of those refugees, 453 were completely self-sufficient after 120 days in the U.S. HIAS continued to see a steady decline in caseload reflecting changes in the former Soviet Union.

HIAS

Cases

Individuals

Self-sufficient (120 days)

251

36 %

452

34.6 %

Self-sufficient (180 days)

193

74.5 %

358

77.7 %

Entered Employment

   

322

33.1 %

Average Hourly Wage

Health Benefits

   

$8.36

110

 

51.9 %

Immigration and Refugee Services of America (IRSA) received $9,522,000 for the enrollment of 4,761 refugees at sixteen sites. IRSA ultimately enrolled 4,836 clients in Matching Grant. Miami continues to be the largest program, enrolling 3,116 clients. More than 59 percent of the caseload consisted of Cuban/Haitian entrants, 21 percent were asylees and 20 percent were refugees.

IRSA

Cases

Individuals

Self-sufficient (120 days)

1,717

84 %

3,143

85 %

Self-sufficient (180 days)

1,813

88 %

3,278

89 %

Entered Employment

   

2,217

81 %

Average Hourly Wage

Health Benefits

   

$7.22

980

 

48 %

International Rescue Committee (IRC) received a grant award of $6,200,000 to enroll 3,100 clients at its sixteen regional offices. By the end of the year, 3,405 new arrivals were enrolled in the program. More than forty-five ethnicities were represented in the IRC caseload. Of 3,115 clients reaching their 120th day, 2,253, or 72 percent were self-sufficient.At the largest site in Miami, Florida, 1,220 clients enrolled in the program, with 96 percent self-sufficient within four months.

IRC

Cases

Individuals

Self-sufficient (120 days)

1,094

72 %

2,253

  72 %

Self-sufficient (180 days)

931

93 %

2,017

94 %

Entered Employment

   

1,365

67 %

Average Hourly Wage

Health Benefits

   

$7.94

650

 

56 %

Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service (LIRS) received $7,404,000 to serve 3,702 clients in CY 2003. LIRS enrolled 3,702 clients during the year at 30 sites. 3,229 individuals completed 120-days in the program, 2,324 of whom became self-sufficient within 120 days.

LIRS

Cases

Individuals

Self-sufficient (120 days)

1,060

 71 %

2,324

  72 %

Self-sufficient (180 days)

1,024

96%

2,251

98 %

Entered Employment

   

1,482

73 %

Average Hourly Wage

Health Benefits

   

$7.76

827

 

65 %

United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) received $15,138,000 million to serve 7,569 clients at 65 sites. USCCB ultimately enrolled 7,798 clients in CY 2003. Of 6,641 reaching the 120th day after arrival, 4,735 reached self-sufficiency.

USCCB

Cases

Individuals

Self-sufficient (120 days)

3,950

85 %

7,798

 71 %

Self-sufficient (180 days)

3,554

90 %

5,184

78 %

Entered Employment

   

2,951

66 %

Average Hourly Wage

Health Benefits

   

$7.43

1,532

 

59 %

World Relief (WR) received $3,200,000 to resettle 1,600 refugees in its ten affiliate sites.  WR enrolled 1,683 clients with those funds, raising in-kind match for all 1,683.  Of 1,250 clients reaching 120 days, 835 were self-sufficient by the 120-day mark. The largest ethnic groups served were refugees from Africa and the former Soviet Union.

WRC

Cases

Individuals

Self-sufficient (120 days)

406

69 %

835

 67%

Self-sufficient (180 days)

427

96 %

939

97 %

Entered Employment

   

559

67 %

Average Hourly Wage

Health Benefits

   

$7.35

407

 

82 %



[1] This program reports client time-specific outcomes during a given period.  Since outcomes are client specific and are up to 180 days in length, not all of a client's outcomes are tabulated in a single year.  Large disruptions in arrivals such as occurred at the end of 2001 and beyond can thus have more outcomes reported than enrollments in a given year.  These figures balance out over the life of the grant.

[2] This is the ratio of the number of cases or individuals independent of cash assistance to the number participating in the program.

[3] Health benefit availability is presented as a percentage of full-time employments.