Resource Library

Each year, ANA convenes panels of experts to objectively analyze and score eligible grant applications. These scores are used to rank eligible applications which help ANA decide which eligible tribes or native organizations will receive funds.

The ANA Reflection Report provides a review of activities in 2023 including special priorities, published reports, and ANA Commissioner engagements. 

This webinar will demonstrate how to create or modify an appropriate evaluation of your ANA project.  Learn how to choose—and use—reliable and valid evaluation measures corresponding to your project outcomes and goals. Presented by ANA’s Eastern Region Training and Technical Assistance Center.

Watch a recording of the webinar. 

Effective project budgeting is necessary to planning and implementing a successful project. This webinar provides an overview of the project development process, how to assess resources and assets, provides a project budgeting tool, and discusses budgeting mechanics. Hosted by the ANA Alaska Region Training and Technical Assistance Center. 

Watch a recording of the webinar. 

Language assessment and proficiency tools are often the best gauges of language acquisition. Join the ANA Pacific Region Training and Technical Assistance Center to learn more about how these tools can help you implement a successful language project. 

Watch a recording of the webinar.

The 2006 Congressional Report provides an impact analysis of 75 ANA projects that ended in 2006.

This webinar, from the ANA Alaska Training & Technical Assistance Center, provides guidance on using the new Grants.gov Workspace.

The key to a well-developed project as well as a competitive grant application is to have a firm foundation in community-based planning. Community planning and preparedness will enable you to easily move forward on projects and funding opportunities that align with your community's long-term goals.

You can view the webinar on ACF's YouTube channel.
 

ANA conducts project-end outcome evaluations that address two main questions: (1) to what extent did the project meet its established objectives and (2) how does the grantee describe the impact of its project on those intended to benefit within its community? This report addresses these questions for projects ending in 2013.