FY 2014 Preliminary Data Table 16 - Average Monthly Percent of Families Reporting Income from TANF

Publication Date: August 13, 2015
State TANF (% Yes) TANF (% No) Invalid/Not Reported Total
Alabama 20% 80% 0% 100%
Alaska 12% 88% 0% 100%
American Samoa 0% 100% 0% 100%
Arizona 17% 83% 0% 100%
Arkansas 10% 90% 0% 100%
California 13% 87% 0% 100%
Colorado 24% 76% 0% 100%
Connecticut 12% 88% 0% 100%
Delaware 16% 84% 0% 100%
District of Columbia 10% 90% 0% 100%
Florida 6% 93% 1% 100%
Georgia 3% 97% 0% 100%
Guam 3% 97% 0% 100%
Hawaii 25% 75% 0% 100%
Idaho 2% 98% 0% 100%
Illinois 8% 92% 0% 100%
Indiana 3% 97% 0% 100%
Iowa 4% 96% 0% 100%
Kansas 4% 96% 0% 100%
Kentucky 3% 97% 0% 100%
Louisiana 5% 87% 8% 100%
Maine 4% 95% 0% 100%
Maryland 36% 64% 0% 100%
Massachusetts 18% 82% 0% 100%
Michigan 16% 84% 0% 100%
Minnesota 29% 71% 0% 100%
Mississippi 22% 78% 0% 100%
Missouri 8% 92% 0% 100%
Montana 11% 89% 0% 100%
Nebraska 17% 83% 0% 100%
Nevada 58% 42% 0% 100%
New Hampshire 19% 76% 5% 100%
New Jersey 12% 88% 0% 100%
New Mexico 12% 88% 0% 100%
New York 43% 57% 0% 100%
North Carolina 5% 95% 0% 100%
North Dakota 11% 89% 0% 100%
Northern Mariana Islands 0% 100% 0% 100%
Ohio 24% 76% 0% 100%
Oklahoma 8% 92% 0% 100%
Oregon 18% 82% 0% 100%
Pennsylvania 14% 86% 0% 100%
Puerto Rico 0% 100% 0% 100%
Rhode Island 14% 86% 0% 100%
South Carolina 11% 0% 89% 100%
South Dakota 6% 94% 0% 100%
Tennessee 63% 37% 0% 100%
Texas 0% 86% 14% 100%
Utah 8% 92% 0% 100%
Vermont 3% 97% 0% 100%
Virgin Islands 3% 98% 0% 100%
Virginia 34% 66% 0% 100%
Washington 13% 87% 0% 100%
West Virginia 10% 90% 0% 100%
Wisconsin 10% 83% 7% 100%
Wyoming 0% 100% 0% 100%
National  14% 83% 2% 100%

Data as of: 26-MAY-2015

Notes applicable to this report:   

  1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FY 2014.   
  2. All percentages are based on "adjusted" numbers of families and children, unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only (which includes Federal Discretionary, Mandatory, and Matching Funds; TANF transfers to CCDF; and State Matching and Maintenance of Effort Funds). The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by its pooling factor, as reported on the ACF-800. This report takes this factor into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.   
  3. All States provide an actual unadjusted count of families served each month.  For States reporting full population data, the number of child records reported each month were directly counted.  However, for States that only submit samples, the ratio of children-to-families was determined each month from the samples and then multiplied by the reported number of families to obtain an estimate of the unadjusted number of children served each month.  The unadjusted average number of families and children was obtained from the monthly numbers in the FY, as reported on the ACF-801 summary (header) record.    
  4. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.   
  5. At the time of publication, American Samoa and Mississippi had submitted 10 months of ACF-801 data for FY 2014. All other States and Territories had submitted the full 12 months of data.
Topics:
Types:
Tags:
Last Reviewed Date: