FY 2018 Preliminary Data Table 4 - Average Monthly Percentages of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs. Settings Legally Operating Without Regulation

Publication Date: December 3, 2019
Current as of:
State/Territory Licensed/
Regulated
Legally Operating
Without Regulation
Invalid/
Not Reported
Total
Alabama 57% 43% 0% 100%
Alaska 97% 1% 2% 100%
American Samoa - - - -
Arizona 95% 5% 0% 100%
Arkansas 99% 0% 1% 100%
California 80% 20% 0% 100%
Colorado 71% 1% 29% 100%
Connecticut 69% 31% 0% 100%
Delaware 94% 6% 0% 100%
District of Columbia 99% 0% 1% 100%
Florida 93% 7% 0% 100%
Georgia 76% 0% 24% 100%
Guam 99% 1% 0% 100%
Hawaii 28% 72% 0% 100%
Idaho 95% 5% 0% 100%
Illinois 73% 26% 1% 100%
Indiana 79% 21% 0% 100%
Iowa 95% 3% 2% 100%
Kansas 93% 7% 0% 100%
Kentucky 99% 1% 0% 100%
Louisiana 93% 3% 4% 100%
Maine 85% 15% 1% 100%
Maryland 95% 5% 0% 100%
Massachusetts 99% 1% 0% 100%
Michigan 79% 21% 0% 100%
Minnesota 89% 11% 0% 100%
Mississippi 99% 1% 0% 100%
Missouri 77% 23% 0% 100%
Montana 94% 6% 0% 100%
Nebraska 92% 7% 0% 100%
Nevada 66% 33% 2% 100%
New Hampshire 95% 4% 1% 100%
New Jersey 99% 1% 0% 100%
New Mexico 91% 8% 0% 100%
New York 73% 27% 0% 100%
North Carolina 90% 0% 10% 100%
North Dakota 86% 14% 0% 100%
Northern Mariana Islands 95% 5% 0% 100%
Ohio 99% 0% 1% 100%
Oklahoma 98% 0% 2% 100%
Oregon 74% 26% 0% 100%
Pennsylvania 93% 6% 1% 100%
Puerto Rico - - - -
Rhode Island 93% 3% 4% 100%
South Carolina 90% 8% 2% 100%
South Dakota 86% 11% 3% 100%
Tennessee 99% 1% 0% 100%
Texas 80% 0% 20% 100%
Utah 96% 3% 0% 100%
Vermont 99% 0% 1% 100%
Virgin Islands - - - -
Virginia 99% 1% 0% 100%
Washington 65% 0% 35% 100%
West Virginia 100% 0% 0% 100%
Wisconsin 100% 0% 0% 100%
Wyoming 90% 9% 1% 100%
National Total 85% 10% 4% 100%

Data as of: 21-AUG-2019

Notes applicable to this table:

  1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FY 2018. 
  2. All percentages are based on "adjusted" numbers of families and children, unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only (which includes Federal Discretionary, Mandatory, and Matching Funds; TANF transfers to CCDF; and State Matching and Maintenance of Effort Funds). The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by its pooling factor, as reported on the ACF-800. This report takes this factor into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.
  3. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.
  4. At the time of publication, American Samoa, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands had not yet reported any ACF-801 data for FY 2018. Arkansas, Guam, and Louisiana had submitted 11 months, and North Carolina had  submitted 1 month. All other States and Territories had submitted the full 12 months of data. 
  5. Some children are reported to have multiple settings for the same month. Children in more than one setting category within the same month were counted in each setting in proportion to the number of hours of service received in each setting. For example, if the child spent 70 hours in a center and 30 hours in a child's home, the child would be scored as 0.7 count in Center and 0.3 count in Child's Home (proportional counting). 
  6. For consistency between related reports involving setting data, children with invalid or missing data for care type, hours, or payment for any setting(s) are reported in the Invalid/Not Reported category.
  7.  "-" indicates data not reported.
  8. CO, TX, and WA have high percentage of out of range/invalid or missing hours and payments. See footnote #6. States are working to correct issue.  
  9. GA notified the Office of Child Care that due to their recent transition to a new eligibility system, they encountered extraction issues that is resulting in high invalid setting data. GA is working to resolve issue.
Types:
Topics:
Tags: