FY 2019 Preliminary Data Table 4 - Average Monthly Percentages of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs. Settings Legally Operating Without Regulation

Publication Date: May 21, 2021
State Licensed/
Regulated
Legally Operating
Without Regulation
Invalid/
Not Reported
Total
Alabama 65% 35% 0% 100%
Alaska 97% 1% 1% 100%
American Samoa - - - -
Arizona 95% 5% 0% 100%
Arkansas 99% 0% 1% 100%
California 77% 22% 1% 100%
Colorado 76% 1% 23% 100%
Connecticut 73% 27% 0% 100%
Delaware 99% 1% 0% 100%
District of Columbia 99% 0% 1% 100%
Florida 92% 6% 2% 100%
Georgia 52% 0% 48% 100%
Guam 99% 1% 0% 100%
Hawaii 34% 66% 0% 100%
Idaho 93% 6% 0% 100%
Illinois 75% 24% 1% 100%
Indiana 78% 22% 0% 100%
Iowa 97% 2% 2% 100%
Kansas 94% 6% 0% 100%
Kentucky 99% 1% 0% 100%
Louisiana 94% 3% 3% 100%
Maine 86% 13% 1% 100%
Maryland 97% 3% 0% 100%
Massachusetts 99% 1% 0% 100%
Michigan 79% 21% 0% 100%
Minnesota 89% 10% 0% 100%
Mississippi 99% 1% 0% 100%
Missouri 81% 19% 0% 100%
Montana 94% 6% 0% 100%
Nebraska 94% 6% 0% 100%
Nevada 63% 34% 3% 100%
New Hampshire 96% 2% 1% 100%
New Jersey 98% 2% 0% 100%
New Mexico 98% 1% 1% 100%
New York 74% 26% 0% 100%
North Carolina 100% 0% 0% 100%
North Dakota 88% 12% 1% 100%
Northern Mariana Islands 96% 4% 0% 100%
Ohio 99% 0% 1% 100%
Oklahoma 98% 0% 2% 100%
Oregon 74% 25% 1% 100%
Pennsylvania 93% 6% 1% 100%
Puerto Rico 57% 28% 15% 100%
Rhode Island 97% 1% 3% 100%
South Carolina 93% 6% 1% 100%
South Dakota 85% 10% 4% 100%
Tennessee 99% 0% 0% 100%
Texas 99% 0% 1% 100%
Utah 96% 4% 0% 100%
Vermont 99% 0% 1% 100%
Virgin Islands - - - -
Virginia 99% 0% 0% 100%
Washington 58% 0% 42% 100%
West Virginia 100% 0% 0% 100%
Wisconsin 99% 0% 1% 100%
Wyoming 91% 9% 0% 100%
National Total 88% 10% 3% 100%

Data as of: 29-JAN-2021

Notes applicable to this table:  

  1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FY 2019. 
  2. All percentages are based on "adjusted" numbers of families and children, unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only (which includes Federal Discretionary, Mandatory, and Matching Funds; TANF transfers to CCDF; and State Matching and Maintenance of Effort Funds). The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by its pooling factor, as reported on the ACF-800. This report takes this factor into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.
  3. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.
  4. At the time of publication, American Samoa and Virgin Islands had not yet reported any ACF-801 data for FY 2019. Alabama had submitted 9 months, Georgia had submitted 2 months, and Louisiana had submitted 11 months.. All other States and Territories had submitted the full 12 months of data.
  5. Some children are reported to have multiple settings for the same month. Children in more than one setting category within the same month were counted in each setting in proportion to the number of hours of service received in each setting. For example, if the child spent 70 hours in a center and 30 hours in a child's home, the child would be scored as 0.7 count in Center and 0.3 count in Child's Home (proportional counting). 
  6. For consistency between related reports involving setting data, children with invalid or missing data for care type, hours, or payment for any setting(s) are reported in the Invalid/Not Reported category.
  7. "-" indicates data not reported.
  8. Colorado, Puerto Rico, and Washington have high percentages of out of range/invalid or missing hours and payments. See footnote #6. States are working to correct these issues.
  9. Georgia notified the Office of Child Care that due to their recent transition to a new eligibility system, they encountered extraction issues that are resulting in a high percentage of cases with invalid setting data. Georgia is working to resolve these issues.
Types:
Audiences:
Last Reviewed Date: