FY 2019 Preliminary Data Table 5 - Children in Settings Legally Operating Without Regulation, Average Monthly Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives

Publication Date: May 21, 2021
State Relative Non-Relative Total % Total Count
Alabama 97% 3% 100% 488
Alaska 73% 28% 100% 40
American Samoa - - - -
Arizona 100% 0% 100% 1,488
Arkansas 0% 100% 100% 4
California 78% 22% 100% 21,380
Colorado 82% 18% 100% 131
Connecticut 100% 0% 100% 3,756
Delaware 100% 0% 100% 12
District of Columbia NA NA NA NA
Florida NA NA NA NA
Georgia 62% 38% 100% 47
Guam 0% 100% 100% 7
Hawaii 80% 20% 100% 2,009
Idaho 36% 64% 100% 365
Illinois 74% 26% 100% 11,004
Indiana 35% 65% 100% 184
Iowa 6% 94% 100% 320
Kansas 85% 15% 100% 663
Kentucky 43% 57% 100% 103
Louisiana 15% 85% 100% 392
Maine 59% 41% 100% 563
Maryland 96% 4% 100% 581
Massachusetts 32% 68% 100% 347
Michigan 67% 33% 100% 6,714
Minnesota 65% 35% 100% 288
Mississippi 25% 75% 100% 174
Missouri 35% 65% 100% 2,167
Montana 62% 38% 100% 206
Nebraska 39% 61% 100% 516
Nevada 72% 28% 100% 1,599
New Hampshire 66% 34% 100% 88
New Jersey 61% 39% 100% 442
New Mexico 51% 49% 100% 282
New York 67% 33% 100% 16,104
North Carolina NA NA NA NA
North Dakota 55% 45% 100% 317
Northern Mariana Islands 91% 9% 100% 11
Ohio NA NA NA NA
Oklahoma NA NA NA NA
Oregon 53% 47% 100% 3,131
Pennsylvania 100% 0% 100% 5,670
Puerto Rico 72% 28% 100% 1,166
Rhode Island 69% 31% 100% 26
South Carolina 75% 25% 100% 285
South Dakota 77% 23% 100% 368
Tennessee 9% 91% 100% 47
Texas 100% 0% 100% 628
Utah 8% 92% 100% 433
Vermont 100% 0% 100% 2
Virgin Islands - - - -
Virginia 2% 98% 100% 63
Washington 100% 0% 100% 4
West Virginia 33% 67% 100% 6
Wisconsin NA NA NA NA
Wyoming 44% 56% 100% 248
National Total 73% 27% 100% 84,872

Data as of: 29-JAN-2021

Notes applicable to this table:  

  1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FY 2019. 
  2. All percentages are based on "adjusted" numbers of families and children, unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only (which includes Federal Discretionary, Mandatory, and Matching Funds; TANF transfers to CCDF; and State Matching and Maintenance of Effort Funds). The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by its pooling factor, as reported on the ACF-800. This report takes this factor into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.
  3. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero.  In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.  In this table, centers operating without regulation (data element 26 = 11) were not included because a determination could not be made if they are relative or non-relative.
  4. In some States there were no children served in unregulated settings and thus the percent is "NA" since division by zero is undefined.  States with no Providers Legally Operating Without Regulation include:  District of Columbia, Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin.
  5. At the time of publication, American Samoa and Virgin Islands had not yet reported any ACF-801 data for FY 2019. Alabama had submitted 9 months, Georgia had submitted 2 months, and Louisiana had submitted 11 months.. All other States and Territories had submitted the full 12 months of data.
  6. Some children are reported to have multiple settings for the same month. Children in more than one setting category within the same month were counted in each setting in proportion to the number of hours of service received in each setting. For example, if the child spent 70 hours in a center and 30 hours in a child's home, the child would be scored as 0.7 count in Center and 0.3 count in Child's Home (proportional counting). 
  7. For consistency between related reports involving setting data, children with invalid or missing data for care type, hours, or payment for any setting(s) are reported in the Invalid/Not Reported category. 8. "-" indicates data not reported.
  8. Colorado, Puerto Rico, and Washington have high percentages of out of range/invalid or missing hours and payments. See footnote #6. States are working to correct these issues.
  9. Georgia notified the Office of Child Care that due to their recent transition to a new eligibility system, they encountered extraction issues that are resulting in a high percentage of cases with invalid setting data. Georgia is working to resolve these issues.

 

Last Reviewed Date: