FY 2020 Final Data Table 5 - Average Monthly Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives

Publication Date: February 26, 2024
Current as of:
State/TerritoryRelativeNon-RelativeTotal %Total Count
Alabama100%0%100%596
Alaska59%41%100%22
American Samoa----
Arizona100%0%100%1,259
Arkansas0%100%100%9
California78%22%100%37,799
Colorado83%17%100%163
Connecticut100%0%100%2,667
Delaware100%0%100%5
District of ColumbiaNANANANA
FloridaNANANANA
Georgia69%31%100%153
Guam0%100%100%5
Hawaii76%24%100%1,059
Idaho31%69%100%803
Illinois75%25%100%12,072
Indiana34%66%100%182
Iowa6%94%100%187
Kansas87%13%100%724
Kentucky39%61%100%95
Louisiana14%86%100%407
Maine60%40%100%454
Maryland94%6%100%504
Massachusetts35%65%100%174
Michigan68%32%100%6,017
Minnesota73%27%100%208
Mississippi95%5%100%1,283
Missouri28%72%100%1,740
Montana83%17%100%83
Nebraska43%57%100%371
Nevada72%28%100%1,369
New Hampshire66%34%100%50
New Jersey63%37%100%314
New MexicoNANANANA
New York69%31%100%12,064
North CarolinaNANANANA
North Dakota63%37%100%254
Northern Mariana Islands100%0%100%12
OhioNANANANA
OklahomaNANANANA
Oregon54%46%100%2,725
Pennsylvania100%0%100%4,774
Puerto Rico67%33%100%494
Rhode Island83%17%100%18
South Carolina84%16%100%164
South Dakota81%19%100%284
Tennessee0%100%100%24
Texas100%0%100%594
Utah7%93%100%408
Vermont100%0%100%2
Virgin Islands67%33%100%6
Virginia6%94%100%49
Washington100%0%100%3
West Virginia29%71%100%7
WisconsinNANANANA
Wyoming45%55%100%216
National Total75%25%100%92,873

Data as of: 11-NOV-2022

Notes applicable to this table: 

  1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FY 2020. 
  2. All percentages are based on "adjusted" numbers of families and children, unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only (which includes Federal Discretionary, Mandatory, and Matching Funds; TANF transfers to CCDF; and State Matching and Maintenance of Effort Funds). The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by its pooling factor, as reported on the ACF-800. This report takes this factor into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.
  3. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero.   In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.   In this table, centers operating without regulation (data element 26 = 11) were not included because a determination could not be made if they are relative or non-relative.
  4. In some States there were no children served in unregulated settings and thus the percent is "NA" since division by zero is undefined.  States with no Providers Legally Operating Without Regulation include:  District of Columbia, Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin.
  5. At the time of publication, American Samoa had not yet reported any ACF-801 data for FY 2020. North Carolina submitted 8 months of ACF-801 data. Ohio submitted 10 months of ACF-801 data. Virgin Islands submitted 3 months of ACF-801 data. All other States and Territories had submitted the full 12 months of data.
  6. Some children are reported to have multiple settings for the same month. Children in more than one setting category within the same month were counted in each setting in proportion to the number of hours of service received in each setting. For example, if the child spent 70 hours in a center and 30 hours in a child's home, the child would be scored as 0.7 count in Center and 0.3 count in Child's Home (proportional counting). 
  7. For consistency between related reports involving setting data, children with invalid or missing data for care type, hours, or payment for any setting(s) are reported in the Invalid/Not Reported category.
  8. "-" indicates data not reported.
  9. Colorado, Puerto Rico, and Washington have high percentages of out of range/invalid or missing hours and payments. See footnote #6. States continue to work to correct these issues.
Types:
Audiences: