FY 2012 Final Data Table 16 - Average Monthly Percent of Families Reporting Income from TANF

Publication Date: October 8, 2014
Current as of:
State TANF (% Yes) TANF (% No) Invalid/Not Reported Total
Alabama 26% 74% 0% 100%
Alaska 11% 89% 0% 100%
American Samoa 0% 100% 0% 100%
Arizona 19% 81% 0% 100%
Arkansas 19% 81% 0% 100%
California 13% 87% 0% 100%
Colorado 27% 73% 0% 100%
Connecticut 12% 88% 0% 100%
Delaware 19% 81% 0% 100%
District of Columbia 16% 84% 0% 100%
Florida 7% 91% 2% 100%
Georgia 7% 93% 0% 100%
Guam 0% 100% 0% 100%
Hawaii 24% 76% 0% 100%
Idaho 2% 98% 0% 100%
Illinois 7% 93% 0% 100%
Indiana 13% 87% 0% 100%
Iowa 10% 90% 0% 100%
Kansas 7% 93% 0% 100%
Kentucky 2% 98% 0% 100%
Louisiana 8% 87% 6% 100%
Maine 5% 95% 0% 100%
Maryland 39% 61% 0% 100%
Massachusetts 23% 77% 0% 100%
Michigan 22% 78% 0% 100%
Minnesota 33% 67% 0% 100%
Mississippi 33% 67% 0% 100%
Missouri 13% 87% 0% 100%
Montana 14% 86% 0% 100%
Nebraska 21% 79% 0% 100%
Nevada 57% 43% 0% 100%
New Hampshire 28% 65% 6% 100%
New Jersey 21% 79% 0% 100%
New Mexico 17% 83% 0% 100%
New York 44% 56% 0% 100%
North Carolina 5% 95% 0% 100%
North Dakota 22% 78% 0% 100%
Northern Mariana Islands 0% 100% 0% 100%
Ohio 16% 84% 0% 100%
Oklahoma 9% 91% 0% 100%
Oregon 18% 82% 0% 100%
Pennsylvania 18% 82% 0% 100%
Puerto Rico 0% 100% 0% 100%
Rhode Island 15% 85% 0% 100%
South Carolina 15% 0% 85% 100%
South Dakota 8% 92% 0% 100%
Tennessee 68% 32% 0% 100%
Texas 0% 89% 11% 100%
Utah 9% 91% 0% 100%
Vermont 5% 95% 0% 100%
Virgin Islands 3% 97% 0% 100%
Virginia 34% 66% 0% 100%
Washington 18% 82% 0% 100%
West Virginia 11% 89% 0% 100%
Wisconsin 12% 88% 0% 100%
Wyoming 0% 100% 0% 100%
National  17% 81% 2% 100%

Data as of: 12-JUN-2014

Notes applicable to this report:

  1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FY 2012.
  2. All percentages are based on "adjusted" numbers of families and children, unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only (which includes Federal Discretionary, Mandatory, and Matching Funds; TANF transfers to CCDF; and State Matching and Maintenance of Effort Funds). The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by its pooling factor, as reported on the ACF-800. This report takes this factor into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.
  3. All States provide an actual unadjusted count of families served each month.  For States reporting full population data, the number of child records reported each month were directly counted.  However, for States that only submit samples, the ratio of children-to-families was determined each month from the samples and then multiplied by the reported number of families to obtain an estimate of the unadjusted number of children served each month.  The unadjusted average number of families and children was obtained from the monthly numbers in the FY, as reported on the ACF-801 summary (header) record.
  4. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.
  5. At the time of publication, all States and Territories had submitted the full 12 months of data for FY 2012.
Types:
Topics:
Tags: