< Back to Search

FY 2014 Preliminary Data Table 4 - Average Monthly Percentages of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs. Settings Legally Operating Without Regulation

Published: August 13, 2015
Categories:
Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) Reporting, Data
Topics:
ACF-800, ACF-801
Types:
Data
State Licensed/
Regulated
Legally Operating
Without Regulation
Invalid/
Not Reported
Total
Alabama 60% 40% 0% 100%
Alaska 80% 19% 1% 100%
American Samoa 7% 0% 93% 100%
Arizona 94% 6% 0% 100%
Arkansas 100% 0% 0% 100%
California 81% 19% 0% 100%
Colorado 89% 1% 10% 100%
Connecticut 63% 37% 0% 100%
Delaware 93% 7% 0% 100%
District of Columbia 98% 0% 2% 100%
Florida 92% 8% 0% 100%
Georgia 99% 1% 0% 100%
Guam 98% 2% 0% 100%
Hawaii 26% 74% 0% 100%
Idaho 84% 15% 0% 100%
Illinois 63% 36% 1% 100%
Indiana 75% 25% 0% 100%
Iowa 89% 10% 1% 100%
Kansas 87% 13% 0% 100%
Kentucky 97% 3% 0% 100%
Louisiana 90% 10% 0% 100%
Maine 85% 14% 1% 100%
Maryland 89% 11% 0% 100%
Massachusetts 100% 0% 0% 100%
Michigan 70% 30% 0% 100%
Minnesota 86% 11% 3% 100%
Mississippi 92% 7% 1% 100%
Missouri 71% 29% 0% 100%
Montana 92% 7% 0% 100%
Nebraska 89% 10% 0% 100%
Nevada 62% 38% 0% 100%
New Hampshire 90% 9% 1% 100%
New Jersey 96% 3% 0% 100%
New Mexico 85% 15% 0% 100%
New York 69% 31% 0% 100%
North Carolina 99% 0% 1% 100%
North Dakota 80% 20% 0% 100%
Northern Mariana Islands 42% 4% 55% 100%
Ohio 99% 0% 1% 100%
Oklahoma 100% 0% 0% 100%
Oregon 56% 43% 2% 100%
Pennsylvania 85% 13% 1% 100%
Puerto Rico 57% 43% 1% 100%
Rhode Island 99% 1% 0% 100%
South Carolina 86% 10% 5% 100%
South Dakota 85% 15% 0% 100%
Tennessee 92% 8% 0% 100%
Texas 99% 1% 0% 100%
Utah 97% 0% 3% 100%
Vermont 90% 8% 1% 100%
Virgin Islands 95% 2% 3% 100%
Virginia 97% 3% 0% 100%
Washington 82% 18% 1% 100%
West Virginia 100% 0% 0% 100%
Wisconsin 100% 0% 0% 100%
Wyoming 87% 13% 0% 100%
National Total 86% 13% 1% 100%

Data as of: 26-MAY-2015

Notes applicable to this table:    

  1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FY 2014.     
  2. All percentages are based on "adjusted" numbers of families and children, unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only (which includes Federal Discretionary, Mandatory, and Matching Funds; TANF transfers to CCDF; and State Matching and Maintenance of Effort Funds). The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by its pooling factor, as reported on the ACF-800. This report takes this factor into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.    
  3. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero.  In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.    
  4. At the time of publication, American Samoa and Missisisppi had submitted 10 months of ACF-801 data for FY 2014. All other States and Territories had submitted the full 12 months of data.     
  5. Some children are reported to have multiple settings for the same month.  Children in more than one setting category within the same month were counted in each setting in proportion to the number of hours of service received in each setting.  For example, if the child spent 70 hours in a center and 30 hours in a child's home, the child would be scored as 0.7 count in Center and 0.3 count in Child's Home (proportional counting).     
  6. For consistency between related reports involving setting data, children with invalid or missing data for care type, hours, or payment for any setting(s) are reported in the Invalid/Not Reported category.