< Back to Search

FY 2015 Preliminary Data Table 17 - Average Monthly Mean Family Co-payment as a Percent of Family Income

Published: November 1, 2016
Categories:
Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) Reporting, Data
Topics:
ACF-800, ACF-801
Types:
Data
State/Territories Families with $0 Income; Headed by a Child; In Protective Services; Invalid CoPay or Income (Category A) (Percent of Families) Families with $0 CoPay (and not in Category A) (Percent of Families) Families with CoPay > $0 (and not in Category A) (Percent of Families) Total of All Families (Percent of Families) Including Families with $0 CoPay (Mean CoPay as a Percent of Income) Excluding Families with $0 CoPay (Mean CoPay as a Percent of Income)
Alabama 15% 10% 75% 100% 5% 6%
Alaska 30% 1% 70% 100% 6% 6%
American Samoa 6% 94% 0% 100% 0% 0%
Arizona 56% 6% 37% 100% 4% 4%
Arkansas 50% 40% 10% 100% 0% 2%
California 3% 60% 37% 100% 2% 4%
Colorado 22% 9% 68% 100% 7% 8%
Connecticut 4% 6% 90% 100% 4% 5%
Delaware 15% 30% 55% 100% 5% 7%
District of Columbia 32% 14% 54% 100% 3% 4%
Florida 30% 0% 70% 100% 6% 6%
Georgia 11% 5% 85% 100% 8% 9%
Guam 7% 28% 65% 100% 7% 9%
Hawaii 4% 11% 85% 100% 11% 12%
Idaho 9% 0% 91% 100% 8% 8%
Illinois 15% 3% 82% 100% 5% 6%
Indiana 2% 66% 32% 100% 2% 7%
Iowa 16% 43% 41% 100% 2% 5%
Kansas 10% 15% 74% 100% 4% 5%
Kentucky 7% 14% 79% 100% 6% 7%
Louisiana 10% 2% 88% 100% 9% 9%
Maine 11% 5% 84% 100% 7% 7%
Maryland 20% 24% 56% 100% 7% 10%
Massachusetts 28% 13% 58% 100% 7% 9%
Michigan 20% 31% 49% 100% 2% 3%
Minnesota 2% 28% 70% 100% 2% 3%
Mississippi 39% 14% 46% 100% 11% 14%
Missouri 33% 12% 55% 100% 5% 6%
Montana 24% 0% 76% 100% 4% 4%
Nebraska 27% 57% 17% 100% 2% 8%
Nevada 15% 32% 53% 100% 3% 4%
New Hampshire 9% 0% 90% 100% 8% 8%
New Jersey 11% 33% 55% 100% 3% 5%
New Mexico 3% 10% 86% 100% 4% 5%
New York 7% 37% 56% 100% 3% 5%
North Carolina 11% 4% 85% 100% 9% 10%
North Dakota 10% 0% 90% 100% 4% 4%
Northern Mariana Islands 5% 8% 85% 100% 2% 3%
Ohio 3% 3% 94% 100% 5% 5%
Oklahoma 31% 16% 53% 100% 6% 8%
Oregon 18% 5% 77% 100% 10% 11%
Pennsylvania 13% 0% 87% 100% 7% 7%
Puerto Rico 14% 64% 22% 100% 1% 4%
Rhode Island 8% 34% 58% 100% 3% 5%
South Carolina 15% 24% 61% 100% 4% 6%
South Dakota 24% 41% 35% 100% 5% 11%
Tennessee 2% 60% 38% 100% 3% 8%
Texas 22% 3% 76% 100% 8% 8%
Utah 5% 4% 92% 100% 5% 5%
Vermont 43% 26% 31% 100% 4% 6%
Virgin Islands 9% 77% 14% 100% 0% 1%
Virginia 32% 6% 62% 100% 6% 6%
Washington 15% 0% 85% 100% 5% 5%
West Virginia 8% 11% 81% 100% 4% 5%
Wisconsin 14% 0% 86% 100% 6% 6%
Wyoming 11% 5% 84% 100% 8% 8%
National 16% 19% 65% 100% 5% 6%

Data as of: 11-JULY-2016

Notes applicable to this report:

  1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FY 2015.
  2. All percentages are based on "adjusted" numbers of families and children, unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only (which includes Federal Discretionary, Mandatory, and Matching Funds; TANF transfers to CCDF; and State Matching and Maintenance of Effort Funds). The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by its pooling factor, as reported on the ACF-800. This report takes this factor into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.
  3. All States provide an actual unadjusted count of families served each month. For States reporting full population data, the number of child records reported each month were directly counted. However, for States that only submit samples, the ratio of children-to-families was determined each month from the samples and then multiplied by the reported number of families to obtain an estimate of the unadjusted number of children served each month. The unadjusted average number of families and children was obtained from the monthly numbers in the FY, as reported on the ACF-801 summary (header) record.
  4. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.
  5. At the time of publication, Massachusetts, Mississippi and the Virgin Islands had submitted 9 months of ACF-801 data for FY 2015; Arkansas, Maryland, and Oklahoma had submitted 10 months; and Florida, Louisiana, and Ohio had submitted 11 months. All other States and Territories had submitted the full 12 months of data.
  6. The "Mean CoPay/Income" columns exclude families with zero income because dividing by zero is undefined.
  7. The column labeled as "Category A" includes: families with zero income; families in Protective Services or families headed by a child; and families with invalid income or copay.
  8. The "Families with $0 Copay …" category is the percentage of families that had a $0 co-payment and were not in Category A, divided by the count of all families. The sum of these three categories is 100%.
  9. The results shown under "Mean Copay/Income" feature two different statistics, "Including" and "Excluding" $0 copay. The data analyzed for the "Including Families with $0 CoPay" category includes all families except those families in the "Category A" data, i.e. the total minus the Category A data. The data analyzed for "Excluding Families with $0 CoPay" includes only those families in the category "Families with CoPay >$0 (and not in Category A)." Alternatively, the data used for "Excluding Families with $0 CoPay" is all the family data minus those families in Category A and minus those families with $0 CoPay.
  10. The National weighted values were determined by multiplying each State's average co-payment/income percentage by the adjusted number of children in each State, summing across the States and then dividing by the adjusted number of children served for the Nation.
Last Reviewed: December 7, 2016