< Back to Search

FY 2015 Preliminary Data Table 4 - Average Monthly Percentages of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs. Settings Legally Operating Without Regulation

Published: November 1, 2016
Categories:
Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) Reporting, Data
Topics:
ACF-800, ACF-801
Types:
Data
State Licensed/
Regulated
Legally Operating
Without Regulation
Invalid/
Not Reported
Total
Alabama 58% 42% 0% 100%
Alaska 82% 18% 1% 100%
American Samoa 63% 0% 37% 100%
Arizona 94% 6% 0% 100%
Arkansas 99% 0% 0% 100%
California 79% 21% 0% 100%
Colorado 88% 1% 11% 100%
Connecticut 65% 35% 0% 100%
Delaware 93% 7% 0% 100%
District of Columbia 98% 0% 2% 100%
Florida 92% 8% 0% 100%
Georgia 99% 1% 0% 100%
Guam 98% 2% 0% 100%
Hawaii 28% 72% 0% 100%
Idaho 86% 13% 0% 100%
Illinois 64% 35% 0% 100%
Indiana 76% 24% 0% 100%
Iowa 90% 9% 1% 100%
Kansas 88% 12% 0% 100%
Kentucky 98% 2% 0% 100%
Louisiana 92% 8% 0% 100%
Maine 85% 14% 1% 100%
Maryland 92% 8% 0% 100%
Massachusetts 99% 1% 0% 100%
Michigan 74% 26% 0% 100%
Minnesota 88% 11% 0% 100%
Mississippi 94% 6% 0% 100%
Missouri 72% 28% 0% 100%
Montana 94% 6% 0% 100%
Nebraska 90% 10% 0% 100%
Nevada 62% 38% 0% 100%
New Hampshire 92% 7% 1% 100%
New Jersey 97% 2% 0% 100%
New Mexico 87% 13% 0% 100%
New York 70% 30% 0% 100%
North Carolina 98% 0% 2% 100%
North Dakota 83% 17% 0% 100%
Northern Mariana Islands 46% 4% 50% 100%
Ohio 99% 0% 1% 100%
Oklahoma 100% 0% 0% 100%
Oregon 58% 40% 1% 100%
Pennsylvania 87% 11% 1% 100%
Puerto Rico 61% 38% 1% 100%
Rhode Island 99% 1% 0% 100%
South Carolina 88% 9% 3% 100%
South Dakota 86% 14% 0% 100%
Tennessee 93% 7% 0% 100%
Texas 99% 1% 0% 100%
Utah 99% 1% 0% 100%
Vermont 92% 7% 1% 100%
Virgin Islands 96% 3% 2% 100%
Virginia 97% 3% 0% 100%
Washington 83% 17% 0% 100%
West Virginia 100% 0% 0% 100%
Wisconsin 100% 0% 0% 100%
Wyoming 88% 11% 0% 100%
National Total 87% 13% 1% 100%

Data as of: 11-JULY-2016

Notes applicable to this table:

  1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FY 2015.
  2. All percentages are based on "adjusted" numbers of families and children, unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only (which includes Federal Discretionary, Mandatory, and Matching Funds; TANF transfers to CCDF; and State Matching and Maintenance of Effort Funds). The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by its pooling factor, as reported on the ACF-800. This report takes this factor into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.
  3. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.
  4. At the time of publication, Massachusetts, Mississippi and the Virgin Islands had submitted 9 months of ACF-801 data for FY 2015; Arkansas, Maryland, and Oklahoma had submitted 10 months; and Florida, Louisiana, and Ohio had submitted 11 months. All other States and Territories had submitted the full 12 months of data.
  5. Some children are reported to have multiple settings for the same month. Children in more than one setting category within the same month were counted in each setting in proportion to the number of hours of service received in each setting. For example, if the child spent 70 hours in a center and 30 hours in a child's home, the child would be scored as 0.7 count in Center and 0.3 count in Child's Home (proportional counting).
  6. For consistency between related reports involving setting data, children with invalid or missing data for care type, hours, or payment for any setting(s) are reported in the Invalid/Not Reported category.
Last Reviewed: December 7, 2016