< Back to Search

FY 2016 Final Data Table 4 - Average Monthly Percentages of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs. Settings Legally Operating Without Regulation

Published: February 5, 2019
Categories:
Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) Reporting, Data
Topics:
ACF-800, ACF-801
Types:
Data
State Licensed/
Regulated
Legally Operating
Without Regulation
Invalid/
Not Reported
Total
Alabama 57% 43% 0% 100%
Alaska 85% 14% 1% 100%
American Samoa 63% 0% 38% 100%
Arizona 95% 5% 0% 100%
Arkansas 99% 0% 1% 100%
California 83% 17% 0% 100%
Colorado 67% 1% 32% 100%
Connecticut 65% 34% 0% 100%
Delaware 93% 7% 0% 100%
District of Columbia 99% 0% 1% 100%
Florida 91% 9% 0% 100%
Georgia 99% 1% 0% 100%
Guam 99% 1% 0% 100%
Hawaii 28% 72% 0% 100%
Idaho 87% 13% 0% 100%
Illinois 68% 31% 1% 100%
Indiana 77% 23% 0% 100%
Iowa 91% 8% 1% 100%
Kansas 91% 9% 0% 100%
Kentucky 99% 1% 0% 100%
Louisiana 90% 6% 3% 100%
Maine 85% 14% 1% 100%
Maryland 93% 7% 0% 100%
Massachusetts 99% 1% 0% 100%
Michigan 76% 24% 0% 100%
Minnesota 88% 11% 1% 100%
Mississippi 96% 4% 0% 100%
Missouri 72% 28% 0% 100%
Montana 95% 5% 0% 100%
Nebraska 91% 9% 0% 100%
Nevada 62% 36% 2% 100%
New Hampshire 93% 6% 1% 100%
New Jersey 98% 2% 0% 100%
New Mexico 88% 12% 0% 100%
New York 69% 31% 0% 100%
North Carolina 82% 0% 18% 100%
North Dakota 82% 18% 0% 100%
Northern Mariana Islands 72% 8% 19% 100%
Ohio 99% 0% 1% 100%
Oklahoma 99% 0% 1% 100%
Oregon 63% 37% 0% 100%
Pennsylvania 90% 9% 1% 100%
Puerto Rico 59% 39% 2% 100%
Rhode Island 99% 1% 0% 100%
South Carolina 89% 8% 3% 100%
South Dakota 85% 13% 1% 100%
Tennessee 95% 5% 0% 100%
Texas 99% 1% 1% 100%
Utah 99% 1% 0% 100%
Vermont 93% 6% 1% 100%
Virgin Islands 99% 1% 0% 100%
Virginia 98% 2% 0% 100%
Washington 81% 19% 0% 100%
West Virginia 100% 0% 0% 100%
Wisconsin 100% 0% 0% 100%
Wyoming 89% 10% 1% 100%
National Total 86% 12% 2% 100%

Notes applicable to this table:Data as of: 25-OCT-2018

  1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FY 2016. 
  2. All percentages are based on "adjusted" numbers of families and children, unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only (which includes Federal Discretionary, Mandatory, and Matching Funds; TANF transfers to CCDF; and State Matching and Maintenance of Effort Funds). The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by its pooling factor, as reported on the ACF-800. This report takes this factor into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.
  3. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.
  4. At the time of publication, American Samoa had submitted 1 month of ACF-801 data for FY 2016. Georgia had submitted 10 months; Louisiana had submitted 11 months; and Rhode Island had submitted 9 months. All other States and Territories had submitted the full 12 months of data. 
  5. Some children are reported to have multiple settings for the same month. Children in more than one setting category within the same month were counted in each setting in proportion to the number of hours of service received in each setting. For example, if the child spent 70 hours in a center and 30 hours in a child's home, the child would be scored as 0.7 count in Center and 0.3 count in Child's Home (proportional counting). 
  6. For consistency between related reports involving setting data, children with invalid or missing data for care type, hours, or payment for any setting(s) are reported in the Invalid/Not Reported category.
Last Reviewed: February 5, 2019