FY 2018 Preliminary Data Table 6 - Average Monthly Percentages of Children Served in All Types of Care

Publication Date: December 3, 2019
Current as of:
STATE TOTAL % OF CHILDREN CHILD'S HOME (LICENSED OR REGULATED PROVIDERS) FAMILY HOME (LICENSED OR REGULATED PROVIDERS) GROUP HOME (LICENSED OR REGULATED PROVIDERS) CENTER (LICENSED OR REGULATED PROVIDERS) CHILD'S HOME - RELATIVE (PROVIDERS LEGALLY OPERATING WITHOUT REGULATION) CHILD'S HOME - NON - RELATIVE (PROVIDERS LEGALLY OPERATING WITHOUT REGULATION) FAMILY HOME - RELATIVE (PROVIDERS LEGALLY OPERATING WITHOUT REGULATION) FAMILY HOME - NON-RELATIVE (PROVIDERS LEGALLY OPERATING WITHOUT REGULATION) GROUP HOME - RELATIVE (PROVIDERS LEGALLY OPERATING WITHOUT REGULATION) GROUP HOME - NON- RELATIVE (PROVIDERS LEGALLY OPERATING WITHOUT REGULATION) CENTER (PROVIDERS LEGALLY OPERATING WITHOUT REGULATION INVALID/ NOT REPORTED
Alabama 100% 0% 2% 2% 54% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 41% 0%
Alaska 100% 0% 18% 8% 71% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2%
American Samoa - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Arizona 100% 0% 3% 4% 88% 2% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Arkansas 100% 0% 4% 0% 95% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1%
California 100% 0% 16% 14% 49% 0% 0% 12% 4% 0% 0% 3% 0%
Colorado 100% 0% 8% 0% 63% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 29%
Connecticut 100% 0% 20% 0% 49% 10% 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 6% 0%
Delaware 100% 0% 12% 3% 80% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0%
District of Columbia 100% 0% 2% 0% 96% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1%
Florida 100% 0% 5% 0% 88% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7% 0%
Georgia 100% 0% 2% 0% 74% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 24%
Guam 100% 0% 0% 0% 99% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Hawaii 100% 0% 7% 0% 22% 43% 11% 13% 4% 0% 0% 1% 0%
Idaho 100% 0% 9% 12% 74% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0%
Illinois 100% 0% 24% 4% 46% 6% 2% 10% 4% 0% 0% 3% 1%
Indiana 100% 0% 35% 0% 43% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 21% 0%
Iowa 100% 0% 29% 7% 60% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 2%
Kansas 100% 0% 41% 0% 52% 1% 1% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Kentucky 100% 0% 3% 1% 95% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Louisiana 100% 0% 0% 0% 93% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 4%
Maine 100% 0% 17% 0% 68% 0% 0% 7% 6% 0% 0% 1% 1%
Maryland 100% 0% 28% 0% 67% 2% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Massachusetts 100% 0% 1% 23% 75% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Michigan 100% 0% 9% 14% 55% 3% 6% 11% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0%
Minnesota 100% 0% 15% 0% 74% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 9% 0%
Mississippi 100% 0% 3% 0% 95% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Missouri 100% 0% 5% 2% 70% 1% 0% 3% 7% 0% 0% 12% 0%
Montana 100% 0% 5% 37% 52% 1% 0% 3% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Nebraska 100% 0% 10% 7% 75% 0% 0% 1% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Nevada 100% 0% 2% 1% 63% 6% 3% 6% 2% 0% 0% 16% 2%
New Hampshire 100% 0% 5% 0% 90% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1%
New Jersey 100% 0% 7% 0% 92% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
New Mexico 100% 0% 2% 5% 84% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0%
New York 100% 0% 5% 33% 35% 7% 4% 4% 2% 0% 0% 10% 0%
North Carolina 100% 0% 4% 0% 86% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10%
North Dakota 100% 0% 7% 35% 44% 0% 0% 8% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Northern Mariana Islands 100% 0% 0% 2% 93% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Ohio 100% 0% 13% 3% 83% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1%
Oklahoma 100% 0% 12% 0% 86% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2%
Oregon 100% 0% 20% 20% 34% 3% 6% 10% 6% 0% 0% 1% 0%
Pennsylvania 100% 0% 5% 4% 84% 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1%
Puerto Rico - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Rhode Island 100% 0% 20% 0% 73% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 4%
South Carolina 100% 0% 0% 1% 89% 0% 0% 2% 1% 0% 0% 5% 2%
South Dakota 100% 0% 21% 3% 62% 0% 1% 8% 2% 0% 0% 0% 3%
Tennessee 100% 0% 4% 5% 90% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Texas 100% 0% 1% 1% 78% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 20%
Utah 100% 1% 28% 0% 68% 0% 1% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Vermont 100% 0% 25% 0% 74% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1%
Virgin Islands - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Virginia 100% 0% 13% 0% 87% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Washington 100% 0% 19% 0% 46% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 35%
West Virginia 100% 0% 26% 9% 65% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Wisconsin 100% 0% 14% 0% 86% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Wyoming 100% 0% 15% 12% 63% 1% 1% 2% 5% 0% 0% 0% 1%
National Total 100% 0% 10% 6% 70% 1% 1% 3% 1% 0% 0% 4% 4%

Data as of: 21-AUG-2019

Notes applicable to this table:

  1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FY 2018. 
  2. All percentages are based on "adjusted" numbers of families and children, unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only (which includes Federal Discretionary, Mandatory, and Matching Funds; TANF transfers to CCDF; and State Matching and Maintenance of Effort Funds). The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by its pooling factor, as reported on the ACF-800. This report takes this factor into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.
  3. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.
  4. At the time of publication, American Samoa, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands had not yet reported any ACF-801 data for FY 2018. Arkansas, Guam, and Louisiana had submitted 11 months, and North Carolina had  submitted 1 month. All other States and Territories had submitted the full 12 months of data. 
  5. Some children are reported to have multiple settings for the same month. Children in more than one setting category within the same month were counted in each setting in proportion to the number of hours of service received in each setting. For example, if the child spent 70 hours in a center and 30 hours in a child's home, the child would be scored as 0.7 count in Center and 0.3 count in Child's Home (proportional counting). 
  6. For consistency between related reports involving setting data, children with invalid or missing data for care type, hours, or payment for any setting(s) are reported in the Invalid/Not Reported category.
  7. "-" indicates data not reported.
  8. CO, TX, and WA have high percentage of out of range/invalid or missing hours and payments. See footnote #6. States are working to correct issue.  
  9. GA notified the Office of Child Care that due to their recent transition to a new eligibility system, they encountered extraction issues that is resulting in high invalid setting data. GA is working to resolve issue.
Types:
Topics:
Tags: