Introduction
Research Questions
- How can a multimethod analysis approach be used to identify core components?
- Which core components were identified as research design priorities for the Fatherhood TIES federal evaluation?
Responsible Fatherhood programs funded through five-year grants from the Office of Family Assistance (OFA) deliver services to support parenting and father-child relationships, economic stability, and fathers’ relationships with romantic partners and coparents. Existing evidence suggests that the effects of fatherhood programs are modest on average but also vary widely. For that reason, there is interest in identifying which features of fatherhood programs are most strongly associated with success. Doing so can help practitioners identify how best to strengthen fatherhood programs so that they yield larger benefits for fathers and their families.
One strategy to achieve this goal is to identify fatherhood program core components and work to directly strengthen those specific parts of a program. Core components are broadly defined as the parts, features, attributes, or characteristics of a program most associated with its success. The Testing Identified Elements for Success in Fatherhood Programs project (Fatherhood TIES) aims to first identify core components in fatherhood programs and then rigorously test their impacts on outcomes related to fathers’ parenting, relationships with coparents, individual well-being, and economic stability.
If researchers can produce evidence about features that make up the core components of fatherhood programs, practitioners will have helpful information to emphasize and invest in those successful elements and ensure they are implemented well. By focusing attention on core components, programs may then be able to produce larger effects for the fathers they serve.
Purpose
This report describes the multimethod approach used to identify core components of fatherhood programs for rigorous testing.
Key Findings and Highlights
The benefits of a multimethod research design approach are twofold: it ensures a wide range of perspectives and types of information are incorporated into decisions about research priorities, and it improves rigor, reducing the risk of drawing inaccurate conclusions.
Through this process, the study team identified the provision of individual support to fathers as being associated with larger effects on target outcomes. Interventions that provide individual support will therefore be made a priority in future stages of the TIES project.
Methods
The Fatherhood TIES team conducted a mix of qualitative and quantitative analyses using different sources of information to identify core components of fatherhood programs to test rigorously in the second stage of the project. The multimethod approach involved four activities: (1) ongoing conversations with fathers, program staff members, and academic experts; (2) a literature review of qualitative studies on fatherhood programs; (3) a meta-analysis of published quantitative studies; and (4) a secondary analysis using program-participation data available across OFA-funded Fatherhood Family-focused, Interconnected, Resilient, and Essential (Fatherhood FIRE) award recipients. After conducting the activities, the Fatherhood TIES team synthesized and cross-checked the findings from them to reach consensus on the promising core components to test in the Fatherhood TIES evaluation.
Citation
Mancini, Patrizia, Ellie Wilson, Meghan McCormick, Dara Lewis, Bright Sarfo, and Dina Israel. 2024. “Identifying Core Components in Fatherhood Programs Through a Multimethod Analysis Approach.” OPRE Report XXXX-XXX, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Glossary
- Core components:
- the parts, features, attributes, or characteristics of a program most associated with its success.
- Fatherhood TIES:
- Testing Identified Elements for Success in Fatherhood Programs project