Introduction
Research Questions
- How and why did partnerships change over time?
- What factors supported or impeded the partnerships’ sustainability?
- What were the characteristics of the child care providers and the services they offered?
- For partnerships that were sustained, what were the features of the partnerships?
- How were partnerships affected by the COVID-19 pandemic?
Partnerships between Early Head Start (EHS) programs and child care providers aim to increase access to high-quality, comprehensive services that meet the needs of infants and toddlers from families with low incomes. The Early Head Start—Child Care Partnerships (EHS-CC Partnerships) grants provided a dedicated funding stream to support some of these partnerships. In 2015, the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) awarded 250 such grants to support partnerships between EHS programs and regulated child care providers, including centers and family child care providers.
The National Descriptive Study (NDS) of EHS-CC Partnerships of 2016, a national study of the partnering EHS programs and child care providers, reported information on the EHS programs, child care centers, and family child care providers participating in the Partnerships that were funded through the 2015 round of grants. This study, the EHS-CC Partnership Sustainability Study of 2022, is a follow-up to the NDS of 2016 intended to examine whether the Partnerships in the 2015 round of grants lasted, how they changed, and the factors related to their sustainability.
Purpose
This report highlights findings from the EHS-CC Partnerships Sustainability Study including how Partnerships were faring as of 2022 and the factors that supported or impeded their sustainability. The information and the lessons learned may inform ongoing and future activities of partnerships in early care and education programs as well as training and technical assistance efforts.
Key Findings and Highlights
The following are key findings of the study:
-
Most (77 percent) EHS programs from the first round of EHS-CC Partnership grants had at least one Partnership with a child care provider sustained between 2016 and 2022. About half (54 percent) of EHS programs formed more than two new partnerships between 2016 and 2022, most often because of a need to maintain total slots after partnership(s) with other child care providers terminated.
-
EHS program directors reported varied factors for the dissolution of Partnerships with specific child care providers. The most frequently reported (42 percent) major factor was difficulty complying with Head Start Program and Performance Standards beyond ratios and credential requirements. The most frequently reported (26 percent) minor factor was misunderstanding about roles and responsibilities.
-
EHS program directors and child care provider respondents reported a number of factors that supported the sustainability of partnerships. The three most frequently reported major supports cited by EHS program directors were: (1) mutual respect with child care providers (81 percent); (2) open communication with child care providers (81 percent); and (3) a commitment among EHS program leadership to partner with child care providers (80 percent). The three most frequently reported major supports cited by child care provider respondents were: (1) stability in leadership at the child care provider (78 percent); (2) a commitment among child care leadership to partner with EHS (72 percent); and (3) a person at the center or family child care provider who actively and enthusiastically promoted partnering with EHS (69 percent).
-
EHS program directors and child care provider respondents reported varied, though largely aligned factors that impeded the sustainability of partnerships. The three most frequently reported major barriers cited by EHS program directors were: (1) challenges recruiting qualified staff (67 percent); (2) insufficient funding (64 percent); and (3) challenges maintaining enrollment in partnership slots (64 percent). The three most frequently reported major barriers cited by child care provider respondents were: (1) challenges recruiting qualified staff (24 percent); (2) insufficient funding (24 percent); and challenges meeting child adult ratio and group size requirements (23 percent).
Methods
The EHS-CC Partnerships Sustainability Study gathered data from three sources:
-
A web-based survey of the 250 EHS program directors that received a 2015 EHS-CC Partnership grant, regardless of whether they participated in the NDS of 2016.
-
A web-based or telephone survey of all child care providers (n = 469) selected to participate in the NDS (regardless of whether they participated in the NDS of 2016). The child care provider survey included some items that were just for providers in sustained Partnerships and some that were just for providers whose Partnerships had dissolved.
-
Semi-structured telephone interviews with a subsample of child care providers (data from semi-structured interviews is not presented in the data tables in this report).
Response rates were lower than anticipated, particularly for providers. This may be partly attributable to continuing difficulties from the pandemic, such as staffing shortages. Given our response rates of 64.4 percent for the EHS program director surveys and 35.4 percent for child care providers, we assessed the potential for nonresponse bias in each survey. This analysis indicated that, at the EHS program director level, weighted estimates are sufficiently unbiased and are representative of the EHS program director population from the 2015 round of grants. At the child care provider level, we do not recommend assuming that weighted estimates are representative of all providers who partnered with the first cohort of programs receiving EHS-CC Partnership grants.
Citation
Clochard, Axelle, Elizabeth Doran, Myah Scott, Robert Lynn-Green, Reggie Gilliard, Daniel Mangoubi, Judy Cannon, Natalie Reid, Yange Xue, and Sara Bernstein (2023). Findings from the Early Head Start - Child Care Partnerships Sustainability Study, OPRE Report 2023-262, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Glossary
- Child care provider:
- Child care center or family child care home that partners with an EHS program to provide services to enrolled infants and toddlers.
- Dissolved Partnership:
- Partnership from the NDS that was no longer in place at the time of the Sustainability Study.
- EHS program:
- A grantee or delegate agency that receives a federal grant to support families with low incomes that have children, from the prenatal period to age 3, by providing a wide range of services both directly and in partnership with community providers. EHS programs are run by nonprofit organizations, community action agencies, or school districts.
- EHS program director:
- An individual who manages the operations of an EHS program and any partnerships with community providers.
- Non-partnership slots:
- Child care provider enrollment spaces that are not funded under the EHS-CC Partnership grants or other Early Head Start grants.
- Partnership program:
- The formal relationship between an EHS program and a child care center or family child care home to provide program services to enrolled infants and toddlers.
- Partnership slots:
- Enrollment spaces in community-based child care providers for which the EHS program has a formal contractual agreement to provide services meeting the Head Start Program Performance Standards. Partnership slots include but are not limited to those funded through EHS-CC Partnership grants
- Sustained Partnership:
- Partnership from the NDS that was still in place at the time of the Sustainability Study.