Resource Library

Explore lessons learned from a pilot designed to build the grant recipients’ capacity to engage in CQI and obtain Sexual Risk Avoidance Education (SRAE) grant recipients' feedback on tools designed to support service providers’ continuous quality improvement (CQI) efforts.

Explore the Tribal Home Visiting evaluation plan profiles for innovative, mixed methods program evaluation designs

Explore the Field Guide for Implementation of Breakthrough Series Collaborative in Early Care and Education to learn about the practical aspects of leading a BSC to support the use of evidence-based practices in ECE centers.

Learn about DFS's expectations for contracts and grantees to develop plans and implement strategies to maximize opportunities for active engagement in DFS projects that are appropriate to the goals of each phase of a project's life cycle.

State and regional early care and education (ECE) leaders can learn about a quality improvement methodology called the Breakthrough Series Collaborative (BSC) that can help ECE programs build their capacity for continuous improvement and make sustained changes in evidence-based practices.

This report describes the development of new center-level measures of implementation and cost for use in early care and education centers.

Learn strategies Head Start programs use to coordinate family support services and processes to ensure alignment with individual family needs and well-being.

This brief highlights the study’s findings related to TANF programs in rural contexts, drawing on our analysis of TANF administrative data and secondary survey sources alongside interviews with human service providers across rural communities.

This short-form product is intended to provide examples relevant to state child care administrators on how local, state, and federal CCEE datasets many be used, either singly or in combination, to examine and track progress toward improving equitable access to CCEE.

This Fact Sheet aims to address frequently asked questions about how the Clearinghouse rates the design and execution of studies it reviews, describe common reasons why studies may receive low ratings on the design and execution standards, and lay our possible approaches to design and execute studies in alignment with the standards.