Program Evaluation

One of our key values is to be results-driven by evaluating our programs with accountability, identifying effective strategies, and integrating them into our policies and practices. In addition to our work with grantees to regularly monitor program performance, OTIP partners with the Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation to assess key questions on program implementation according to ACF's Evaluation Policy.

Current ACF Evaluation Projects

  • Evaluation of Domestic Human Trafficking Demonstration Projects, 2014-2018

    Cross-site process evaluations of two cohorts of grantees assisting victims of human trafficking in Salt Lake City; New York City; the metropolitan areas of Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona; Multnomah County (Portland), Oregon; six counties in North Dakota as well as Clay County, Minnesota; and Yellowstone County (Billings), Montana.

  • Evaluation of Domestic Victims of Human Trafficking Program, 2016-2020

    Evaluation of grantee policies, practices, and services – including a focus on access to long-term housing options, substance abuse treatment, and integration of survivor-informed services.

  • Evaluation of the National Human Trafficking Hotline Program Overview

    Evaluation of activities, procedures, organization, customer service, and immediate outcomes of the National Human Trafficking Hotline.

  • Evaluation of Trafficking Victim Assistance Program

    This program assessment aims to address the following goals:

    1. Gain in-depth knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of the current per capita funding allocation method
    2. Gain in-depth knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of the current regional grant structure
    3. Determine if efficiencies can be gained through improved coordination of services and/or merger of different federal trafficking programs
    4. Identify potential alternative funding or grant structure strategies that would address the needs of the target population (i.e., foreign national victims of human trafficking)

    Qualitative data (i.e., key informant interviews and focus groups) will be used to address the first, second, and fourth goals of the study. The qualitative component of the assessment will involve (1) key informant interviews with a sample of fiscal year (FY) 2016 TVAP grantees and subrecipients (e.g., grant administrators, case managers, and service referral contacts) and (2) focus groups with a sample of TVAP subrecipients with extensive knowledge of trafficking-related grants or funding allocation models. This project will also include focus groups with select federal stakeholders.

Past ACF Evaluation Projects

Last Reviewed: October 22, 2018

Was this page helpful?

Step One
I found this page helpful because the content on the page: (check all that apply)
I did not find this page helpful because the content on the page: (check all that apply)

Your feedback is important to us and will help improve our website. Thank you!

Step Two
Back to Top