FY 2011 Final Data Table 5 - Children in Settings Legally Operating Without Regulation, Average Monthly Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives

Publication Date: January 27, 2014
Current as of:
State Relative Non-Relative Total % Total Count
Alabama 99% 1% 100% 618
Alaska 58% 42% 100% 960
American Samoa NA NA NA 0
Arizona 100% 0% 100% 2,011
Arkansas 0% 100% 100% 47
California 70% 30% 100% 25,662
Colorado 77% 23% 100% 383
Connecticut 80% 20% 100% 2,925
Delaware 100% 0% 100% 248
District of Columbia 100% 0% 100% 6
Florida 33% 67% 100% 168
Georgia 77% 23% 100% 1,377
Guam 59% 41% 100% 54
Hawaii 87% 13% 100% 6,035
Idaho 38% 62% 100% 1,564
Illinois 64% 36% 100% 23,833
Indiana 35% 65% 100% 899
Iowa 0% 100% 100% 2,267
Kansas 84% 16% 100% 3,273
Kentucky 59% 41% 100% 1,311
Louisiana 37% 63% 100% 4,771
Maine 17% 83% 100% 170
Maryland 85% 15% 100% 3,576
Massachusetts NA NA NA 0
Michigan 63% 37% 100% 25,529
Minnesota 56% 44% 100% 5,883
Mississippi 51% 49% 100% 5,005
Missouri 49% 51% 100% 8,671
Montana 52% 48% 100% 703
Nebraska 16% 84% 100% 1,429
Nevada 60% 40% 100% 1,180
New Hampshire 36% 64% 100% 555
New Jersey 42% 58% 100% 2,190
New Mexico 68% 32% 100% 4,118
New York 53% 47% 100% 38,894
North Carolina 83% 17% 100% 778
North Dakota 43% 57% 100% 1,255
Northern Mariana Islands 100% 0% 100% 2
Ohio NA NA NA 0
Oklahoma NA NA NA 0
Oregon 39% 61% 100% 9,616
Pennsylvania 57% 43% 100% 20,906
Puerto Rico 67% 33% 100% 6,755
Rhode Island 56% 44% 100% 61
South Carolina 21% 79% 100% 1,953
South Dakota 64% 36% 100% 825
Tennessee 25% 75% 100% 4,247
Texas 100% 0% 100% 1,180
Utah 100% 0% 100% 3,640
Vermont 56% 44% 100% 498
Virgin Islands 71% 29% 100% 7
Virginia 49% 51% 100% 2,208
Washington 71% 29% 100% 8,895
West Virginia 52% 48% 100% 25
Wisconsin NA NA NA 0
Wyoming 58% 42% 100% 835
National Total 60% 40% 100% 240,006

Data as of: 14-NOV-2013

Notes applicable to this table:   

  1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FFY 2011.     
  2. All percentages are based on "adjusted" numbers of families and children, unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only (which includes Federal Discretionary, Mandatory, and Matching Funds; TANF transfers to CCDF; and State Matching and Maintenance of Effort Funds). The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by its pooling factor, as reported on the ACF-800. This report takes this factor into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.    
  3. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero.  In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding.  In this table, centers operating without regulation (data element 26 = 11) were considered Non-Relative.    
  4. In some States there were no children served in unregulated settings and thus the percent is "NA" since division by zero is undefined.  States with no Providers Legally Operating Without Regulation include:  American Samoa, Massachusetts, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin.    
  5. At the time of publication, all States and Territories had submitted the full 12 months of ACF-801 data for FFY 2011.      
  6. Some children are reported to have multiple settings for the same month.  Children in more than one setting category within the same month were counted in each setting in proportion to the number of hours of service received in each setting.  For example, if the child spent 70 hours in a center and 30 hours in a child's home, the child would be scored as 0.7 count in Center and 0.3 count in Child's Home (proportional counting).     
  7. For consistency between related reports involving setting data, children with invalid or missing data for care type, hours, or payment for any setting(s) are reported in the Invalid/Not Reported category.
Types:
Topics:
Tags: